Cargando…

The Five-year KRAS, NRAS and BRAF Analysis Results and Treatment Patterns in Daily Clinical Practice in Slovenia in 1(st) Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal (mCRC) Patients with RAS Wild-type Tumour (wtRAS) – A Real- Life Data Report 2013–2018

BACKGROUND: We preformed a Phase IV non-interventional study to assess KRAS, NRAS and BRAF status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients suitable for 1(st) line treatment and to evaluate the decisions for 1(st) line treatment considering the treatment goals in the RAS wild type (wt) patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mesti, Tanja, Rebersek, Martina, Ocvirk, Janja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36942906
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2023-0014
_version_ 1784912274618580992
author Mesti, Tanja
Rebersek, Martina
Ocvirk, Janja
author_facet Mesti, Tanja
Rebersek, Martina
Ocvirk, Janja
author_sort Mesti, Tanja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We preformed a Phase IV non-interventional study to assess KRAS, NRAS and BRAF status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients suitable for 1(st) line treatment and to evaluate the decisions for 1(st) line treatment considering the treatment goals in the RAS wild type (wt) patients. The aim of our study was also to evaluate the influence of a waiting period for biomarkers analysis on the start of first-line treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed mCRC adenocarcinoma suitable for first-line treatment fulfilling all inclusion criteria were included in the study. The KRAS, NRAS and BRAF analysis was performed from tissue samples of primary tumor site or metastatic site. All included patients have given consent to participate in the study by signing the informed consent form. RESULTS: From April 2013 to March 2018 at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana 650 patients were included, 637 of them were treated with first- line systemic treatment according to RAS and BRAF status. Remaining 13 patients with mCRC did not receive systemic first-line treatment. The distribution of patients with KRAS mutated and wild-type tumors, was almost equal, 48.8% and 47.9% respectively, 89 % of the patients had wt NRAS tumours and 86.1% had wt BRAF tumours. The most frequently prescribed treatment was bevacizumab-based therapy (53.1%), either in combination with doublet chemotherapy or with mono-chemotherapy. EGFR inhibitors cetuximab and panitumumab were prescribed in wt RAS mCRC patients (30.9%). The waiting period for biomarkers analysis was two weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world data, single centre 5-year analysis showed that the distribution between wild type and mutated type tumors of the patients with mCRC was approximately the same, as worldwide, so the Slovenian population with mCRC has the same ratio distribution of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF wild and mutated genes. We concluded that a two-week waiting period for biomarkers analysis did not influence the first line treatment decision, so it was in the accordance with the worldwide treatment guidelines based on evidence-based medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10039470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100394702023-03-26 The Five-year KRAS, NRAS and BRAF Analysis Results and Treatment Patterns in Daily Clinical Practice in Slovenia in 1(st) Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal (mCRC) Patients with RAS Wild-type Tumour (wtRAS) – A Real- Life Data Report 2013–2018 Mesti, Tanja Rebersek, Martina Ocvirk, Janja Radiol Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: We preformed a Phase IV non-interventional study to assess KRAS, NRAS and BRAF status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients suitable for 1(st) line treatment and to evaluate the decisions for 1(st) line treatment considering the treatment goals in the RAS wild type (wt) patients. The aim of our study was also to evaluate the influence of a waiting period for biomarkers analysis on the start of first-line treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed mCRC adenocarcinoma suitable for first-line treatment fulfilling all inclusion criteria were included in the study. The KRAS, NRAS and BRAF analysis was performed from tissue samples of primary tumor site or metastatic site. All included patients have given consent to participate in the study by signing the informed consent form. RESULTS: From April 2013 to March 2018 at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana 650 patients were included, 637 of them were treated with first- line systemic treatment according to RAS and BRAF status. Remaining 13 patients with mCRC did not receive systemic first-line treatment. The distribution of patients with KRAS mutated and wild-type tumors, was almost equal, 48.8% and 47.9% respectively, 89 % of the patients had wt NRAS tumours and 86.1% had wt BRAF tumours. The most frequently prescribed treatment was bevacizumab-based therapy (53.1%), either in combination with doublet chemotherapy or with mono-chemotherapy. EGFR inhibitors cetuximab and panitumumab were prescribed in wt RAS mCRC patients (30.9%). The waiting period for biomarkers analysis was two weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world data, single centre 5-year analysis showed that the distribution between wild type and mutated type tumors of the patients with mCRC was approximately the same, as worldwide, so the Slovenian population with mCRC has the same ratio distribution of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF wild and mutated genes. We concluded that a two-week waiting period for biomarkers analysis did not influence the first line treatment decision, so it was in the accordance with the worldwide treatment guidelines based on evidence-based medicine. Sciendo 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10039470/ /pubmed/36942906 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2023-0014 Text en © 2023 Tanja Mesti, Martina Rebersek, Janja Ocvirk, published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mesti, Tanja
Rebersek, Martina
Ocvirk, Janja
The Five-year KRAS, NRAS and BRAF Analysis Results and Treatment Patterns in Daily Clinical Practice in Slovenia in 1(st) Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal (mCRC) Patients with RAS Wild-type Tumour (wtRAS) – A Real- Life Data Report 2013–2018
title The Five-year KRAS, NRAS and BRAF Analysis Results and Treatment Patterns in Daily Clinical Practice in Slovenia in 1(st) Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal (mCRC) Patients with RAS Wild-type Tumour (wtRAS) – A Real- Life Data Report 2013–2018
title_full The Five-year KRAS, NRAS and BRAF Analysis Results and Treatment Patterns in Daily Clinical Practice in Slovenia in 1(st) Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal (mCRC) Patients with RAS Wild-type Tumour (wtRAS) – A Real- Life Data Report 2013–2018
title_fullStr The Five-year KRAS, NRAS and BRAF Analysis Results and Treatment Patterns in Daily Clinical Practice in Slovenia in 1(st) Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal (mCRC) Patients with RAS Wild-type Tumour (wtRAS) – A Real- Life Data Report 2013–2018
title_full_unstemmed The Five-year KRAS, NRAS and BRAF Analysis Results and Treatment Patterns in Daily Clinical Practice in Slovenia in 1(st) Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal (mCRC) Patients with RAS Wild-type Tumour (wtRAS) – A Real- Life Data Report 2013–2018
title_short The Five-year KRAS, NRAS and BRAF Analysis Results and Treatment Patterns in Daily Clinical Practice in Slovenia in 1(st) Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal (mCRC) Patients with RAS Wild-type Tumour (wtRAS) – A Real- Life Data Report 2013–2018
title_sort five-year kras, nras and braf analysis results and treatment patterns in daily clinical practice in slovenia in 1(st) line treatment of metastatic colorectal (mcrc) patients with ras wild-type tumour (wtras) – a real- life data report 2013–2018
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36942906
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2023-0014
work_keys_str_mv AT mestitanja thefiveyearkrasnrasandbrafanalysisresultsandtreatmentpatternsindailyclinicalpracticeinsloveniain1stlinetreatmentofmetastaticcolorectalmcrcpatientswithraswildtypetumourwtrasareallifedatareport20132018
AT rebersekmartina thefiveyearkrasnrasandbrafanalysisresultsandtreatmentpatternsindailyclinicalpracticeinsloveniain1stlinetreatmentofmetastaticcolorectalmcrcpatientswithraswildtypetumourwtrasareallifedatareport20132018
AT ocvirkjanja thefiveyearkrasnrasandbrafanalysisresultsandtreatmentpatternsindailyclinicalpracticeinsloveniain1stlinetreatmentofmetastaticcolorectalmcrcpatientswithraswildtypetumourwtrasareallifedatareport20132018
AT mestitanja fiveyearkrasnrasandbrafanalysisresultsandtreatmentpatternsindailyclinicalpracticeinsloveniain1stlinetreatmentofmetastaticcolorectalmcrcpatientswithraswildtypetumourwtrasareallifedatareport20132018
AT rebersekmartina fiveyearkrasnrasandbrafanalysisresultsandtreatmentpatternsindailyclinicalpracticeinsloveniain1stlinetreatmentofmetastaticcolorectalmcrcpatientswithraswildtypetumourwtrasareallifedatareport20132018
AT ocvirkjanja fiveyearkrasnrasandbrafanalysisresultsandtreatmentpatternsindailyclinicalpracticeinsloveniain1stlinetreatmentofmetastaticcolorectalmcrcpatientswithraswildtypetumourwtrasareallifedatareport20132018