Cargando…

The effect of sandblasting versus acid etching on the surface roughness and biaxial flexural strength of CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramics (In vitro study)

BACKGROUND: CAD/CAM resin matrix ceramics are one of the materials used in dental offices. The long-term success of the restoration depends on the bond strength of the restoration to the tooth and other materials; thus, surface treatment of the restoration is necessary to achieve this. But such trea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muhammed, Heba A., Mahmoud, Elsayed M., Fahmy, Amal E., Nasr, Dina M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36964539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02883-6
_version_ 1784912287336759296
author Muhammed, Heba A.
Mahmoud, Elsayed M.
Fahmy, Amal E.
Nasr, Dina M.
author_facet Muhammed, Heba A.
Mahmoud, Elsayed M.
Fahmy, Amal E.
Nasr, Dina M.
author_sort Muhammed, Heba A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: CAD/CAM resin matrix ceramics are one of the materials used in dental offices. The long-term success of the restoration depends on the bond strength of the restoration to the tooth and other materials; thus, surface treatment of the restoration is necessary to achieve this. But such treatment may affect the restoration strength. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of various surface treatments on the surface roughness (Ra) and the biaxial flexural strength of two CAD-CAM resin-matrix ceramics. METHODS: Thirty-six-disc-shaped specimens, each measuring 1.2 mm in thickness and 12 mm in diameter, were machined from two resin-matrix ceramic blocks (Lava Ultimate and Cerasmart) (n = 18). Based on the surface treatments, each material was divided into 3 groups: control (no treatment), 50-μm Al(2)O(3) sandblasting, or 9% hydrofluoric acid etching (n = 6). The surface roughness (Ra) was evaluated by the 3D laser scanning microscope. Then, specimens were aged by thermal cycling (5000 cycles) and tested for biaxial flexural strength using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. RESULTS: No significant differences in flexural strength or Ra were found for Lava Ultimate among the surface treatment groups. For Cerasmart, only the sandblasting group showed significantly higher Ra values than the control group. Also, the Ra values for the sandblasting group were significantly higher than those for the acid etching group. The flexural strengths of the sandblasting and acid etching groups for Cerasmart were statistically similar, and both were significantly lower than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Although all of the applied surface conditioning techniques improved Ra, they had a negative impact on the flexural strength of resin-matrix ceramics. Thus, clinicians should utilize the appropriate surface treatment techniques, taking into account their effects on the surface roughness and mechanical properties of resin-matrix ceramics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10039528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100395282023-03-26 The effect of sandblasting versus acid etching on the surface roughness and biaxial flexural strength of CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramics (In vitro study) Muhammed, Heba A. Mahmoud, Elsayed M. Fahmy, Amal E. Nasr, Dina M. BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: CAD/CAM resin matrix ceramics are one of the materials used in dental offices. The long-term success of the restoration depends on the bond strength of the restoration to the tooth and other materials; thus, surface treatment of the restoration is necessary to achieve this. But such treatment may affect the restoration strength. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of various surface treatments on the surface roughness (Ra) and the biaxial flexural strength of two CAD-CAM resin-matrix ceramics. METHODS: Thirty-six-disc-shaped specimens, each measuring 1.2 mm in thickness and 12 mm in diameter, were machined from two resin-matrix ceramic blocks (Lava Ultimate and Cerasmart) (n = 18). Based on the surface treatments, each material was divided into 3 groups: control (no treatment), 50-μm Al(2)O(3) sandblasting, or 9% hydrofluoric acid etching (n = 6). The surface roughness (Ra) was evaluated by the 3D laser scanning microscope. Then, specimens were aged by thermal cycling (5000 cycles) and tested for biaxial flexural strength using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. RESULTS: No significant differences in flexural strength or Ra were found for Lava Ultimate among the surface treatment groups. For Cerasmart, only the sandblasting group showed significantly higher Ra values than the control group. Also, the Ra values for the sandblasting group were significantly higher than those for the acid etching group. The flexural strengths of the sandblasting and acid etching groups for Cerasmart were statistically similar, and both were significantly lower than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Although all of the applied surface conditioning techniques improved Ra, they had a negative impact on the flexural strength of resin-matrix ceramics. Thus, clinicians should utilize the appropriate surface treatment techniques, taking into account their effects on the surface roughness and mechanical properties of resin-matrix ceramics. BioMed Central 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10039528/ /pubmed/36964539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02883-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Muhammed, Heba A.
Mahmoud, Elsayed M.
Fahmy, Amal E.
Nasr, Dina M.
The effect of sandblasting versus acid etching on the surface roughness and biaxial flexural strength of CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramics (In vitro study)
title The effect of sandblasting versus acid etching on the surface roughness and biaxial flexural strength of CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramics (In vitro study)
title_full The effect of sandblasting versus acid etching on the surface roughness and biaxial flexural strength of CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramics (In vitro study)
title_fullStr The effect of sandblasting versus acid etching on the surface roughness and biaxial flexural strength of CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramics (In vitro study)
title_full_unstemmed The effect of sandblasting versus acid etching on the surface roughness and biaxial flexural strength of CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramics (In vitro study)
title_short The effect of sandblasting versus acid etching on the surface roughness and biaxial flexural strength of CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramics (In vitro study)
title_sort effect of sandblasting versus acid etching on the surface roughness and biaxial flexural strength of cad/cam resin-matrix ceramics (in vitro study)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36964539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02883-6
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammedhebaa theeffectofsandblastingversusacidetchingonthesurfaceroughnessandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofcadcamresinmatrixceramicsinvitrostudy
AT mahmoudelsayedm theeffectofsandblastingversusacidetchingonthesurfaceroughnessandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofcadcamresinmatrixceramicsinvitrostudy
AT fahmyamale theeffectofsandblastingversusacidetchingonthesurfaceroughnessandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofcadcamresinmatrixceramicsinvitrostudy
AT nasrdinam theeffectofsandblastingversusacidetchingonthesurfaceroughnessandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofcadcamresinmatrixceramicsinvitrostudy
AT muhammedhebaa effectofsandblastingversusacidetchingonthesurfaceroughnessandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofcadcamresinmatrixceramicsinvitrostudy
AT mahmoudelsayedm effectofsandblastingversusacidetchingonthesurfaceroughnessandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofcadcamresinmatrixceramicsinvitrostudy
AT fahmyamale effectofsandblastingversusacidetchingonthesurfaceroughnessandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofcadcamresinmatrixceramicsinvitrostudy
AT nasrdinam effectofsandblastingversusacidetchingonthesurfaceroughnessandbiaxialflexuralstrengthofcadcamresinmatrixceramicsinvitrostudy