Cargando…
Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses
BACKGROUND: Offloading devices improve healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFUs) but they can limit mobilisation. Rehabilitation during or after removal of these devices may promote physical activity in a population at risk of poor health outcomes for which inactivity is a reversible risk facto...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36966316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-023-00614-2 |
_version_ | 1784912292429692928 |
---|---|
author | Jones, K. Backhouse, M. R. Bruce, J. |
author_facet | Jones, K. Backhouse, M. R. Bruce, J. |
author_sort | Jones, K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Offloading devices improve healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFUs) but they can limit mobilisation. Rehabilitation during or after removal of these devices may promote physical activity in a population at risk of poor health outcomes for which inactivity is a reversible risk factor. METHODS: This systematic review examined the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions to promote physical activity during and/or after wearing an offloading device to treat diabetes-related foot ulcers. Searches using MESH terms and free-text combinations: ‘foot ulcer’, ‘diabetic foot’, ‘casts, surgical’, ‘orthotic devices’ were applied to MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library and clinical trial registers for randomised and observational studies published to September 2022. Methodological quality assessment of included studies was undertaken using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) and Risk of Bias In Non-randomised studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools. RESULTS: Of 3332 records identified, eight studies (441 participants), four clinical trials and four cohort studies, were included. None delivered or tested a structured rehabilitation programme, but all reported physical activity outcomes during or after device use. People wearing non-removable total contact casts were less active than those wearing devices (SMD -0.45; 95% CI − 0.87 to − 0.04; p = 0.03; I(2) 56%; 4 trials). Diabetes-related foot ulcers in people wearing total contact casts were more likely to heal compared to removable devices at 12 weeks (OR 2.69; 95% CI 0.97 to 7.45; p = 0.06; I(2) = 64%; 4 trials) and 20 weeks (OR 2.35; 95% CI 0.95 to 5.82; p = 0.07; I(2) = 65%; 4 trials). CONCLUSIONS: Despite physical activity being low throughout off-loading treatment, no studies have specifically tested rehabilitation. There is a need to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation programmes in this population. High quality trials are needed to provide robust evidence to support to rehabilitation after DFU treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-023-00614-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10039553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100395532023-03-26 Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses Jones, K. Backhouse, M. R. Bruce, J. J Foot Ankle Res Review BACKGROUND: Offloading devices improve healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFUs) but they can limit mobilisation. Rehabilitation during or after removal of these devices may promote physical activity in a population at risk of poor health outcomes for which inactivity is a reversible risk factor. METHODS: This systematic review examined the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions to promote physical activity during and/or after wearing an offloading device to treat diabetes-related foot ulcers. Searches using MESH terms and free-text combinations: ‘foot ulcer’, ‘diabetic foot’, ‘casts, surgical’, ‘orthotic devices’ were applied to MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library and clinical trial registers for randomised and observational studies published to September 2022. Methodological quality assessment of included studies was undertaken using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) and Risk of Bias In Non-randomised studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools. RESULTS: Of 3332 records identified, eight studies (441 participants), four clinical trials and four cohort studies, were included. None delivered or tested a structured rehabilitation programme, but all reported physical activity outcomes during or after device use. People wearing non-removable total contact casts were less active than those wearing devices (SMD -0.45; 95% CI − 0.87 to − 0.04; p = 0.03; I(2) 56%; 4 trials). Diabetes-related foot ulcers in people wearing total contact casts were more likely to heal compared to removable devices at 12 weeks (OR 2.69; 95% CI 0.97 to 7.45; p = 0.06; I(2) = 64%; 4 trials) and 20 weeks (OR 2.35; 95% CI 0.95 to 5.82; p = 0.07; I(2) = 65%; 4 trials). CONCLUSIONS: Despite physical activity being low throughout off-loading treatment, no studies have specifically tested rehabilitation. There is a need to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation programmes in this population. High quality trials are needed to provide robust evidence to support to rehabilitation after DFU treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-023-00614-2. BioMed Central 2023-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10039553/ /pubmed/36966316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-023-00614-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Jones, K. Backhouse, M. R. Bruce, J. Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses |
title | Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses |
title_full | Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses |
title_fullStr | Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses |
title_short | Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses |
title_sort | rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36966316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-023-00614-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesk rehabilitationforpeoplewearingoffloadingdevicesfordiabetesrelatedfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT backhousemr rehabilitationforpeoplewearingoffloadingdevicesfordiabetesrelatedfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses AT brucej rehabilitationforpeoplewearingoffloadingdevicesfordiabetesrelatedfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses |