Cargando…

Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND: Offloading devices improve healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFUs) but they can limit mobilisation. Rehabilitation during or after removal of these devices may promote physical activity in a population at risk of poor health outcomes for which inactivity is a reversible risk facto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, K., Backhouse, M. R., Bruce, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36966316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-023-00614-2
_version_ 1784912292429692928
author Jones, K.
Backhouse, M. R.
Bruce, J.
author_facet Jones, K.
Backhouse, M. R.
Bruce, J.
author_sort Jones, K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Offloading devices improve healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFUs) but they can limit mobilisation. Rehabilitation during or after removal of these devices may promote physical activity in a population at risk of poor health outcomes for which inactivity is a reversible risk factor. METHODS: This systematic review examined the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions to promote physical activity during and/or after wearing an offloading device to treat diabetes-related foot ulcers. Searches using MESH terms and free-text combinations: ‘foot ulcer’, ‘diabetic foot’, ‘casts, surgical’, ‘orthotic devices’ were applied to MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library and clinical trial registers for randomised and observational studies published to September 2022. Methodological quality assessment of included studies was undertaken using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) and Risk of Bias In Non-randomised studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools. RESULTS: Of 3332 records identified, eight studies (441 participants), four clinical trials and four cohort studies, were included. None delivered or tested a structured rehabilitation programme, but all reported physical activity outcomes during or after device use. People wearing non-removable total contact casts were less active than those wearing devices (SMD -0.45; 95% CI − 0.87 to − 0.04; p = 0.03; I(2) 56%; 4 trials). Diabetes-related foot ulcers in people wearing total contact casts were more likely to heal compared to removable devices at 12 weeks (OR 2.69; 95% CI 0.97 to 7.45; p = 0.06; I(2) = 64%; 4 trials) and 20 weeks (OR 2.35; 95% CI 0.95 to 5.82; p = 0.07; I(2) = 65%; 4 trials). CONCLUSIONS: Despite physical activity being low throughout off-loading treatment, no studies have specifically tested rehabilitation. There is a need to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation programmes in this population. High quality trials are needed to provide robust evidence to support to rehabilitation after DFU treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-023-00614-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10039553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100395532023-03-26 Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses Jones, K. Backhouse, M. R. Bruce, J. J Foot Ankle Res Review BACKGROUND: Offloading devices improve healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFUs) but they can limit mobilisation. Rehabilitation during or after removal of these devices may promote physical activity in a population at risk of poor health outcomes for which inactivity is a reversible risk factor. METHODS: This systematic review examined the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions to promote physical activity during and/or after wearing an offloading device to treat diabetes-related foot ulcers. Searches using MESH terms and free-text combinations: ‘foot ulcer’, ‘diabetic foot’, ‘casts, surgical’, ‘orthotic devices’ were applied to MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library and clinical trial registers for randomised and observational studies published to September 2022. Methodological quality assessment of included studies was undertaken using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) and Risk of Bias In Non-randomised studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools. RESULTS: Of 3332 records identified, eight studies (441 participants), four clinical trials and four cohort studies, were included. None delivered or tested a structured rehabilitation programme, but all reported physical activity outcomes during or after device use. People wearing non-removable total contact casts were less active than those wearing devices (SMD -0.45; 95% CI − 0.87 to − 0.04; p = 0.03; I(2) 56%; 4 trials). Diabetes-related foot ulcers in people wearing total contact casts were more likely to heal compared to removable devices at 12 weeks (OR 2.69; 95% CI 0.97 to 7.45; p = 0.06; I(2) = 64%; 4 trials) and 20 weeks (OR 2.35; 95% CI 0.95 to 5.82; p = 0.07; I(2) = 65%; 4 trials). CONCLUSIONS: Despite physical activity being low throughout off-loading treatment, no studies have specifically tested rehabilitation. There is a need to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation programmes in this population. High quality trials are needed to provide robust evidence to support to rehabilitation after DFU treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-023-00614-2. BioMed Central 2023-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10039553/ /pubmed/36966316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-023-00614-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Jones, K.
Backhouse, M. R.
Bruce, J.
Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title_full Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title_fullStr Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title_full_unstemmed Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title_short Rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses
title_sort rehabilitation for people wearing offloading devices for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analyses
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36966316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-023-00614-2
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesk rehabilitationforpeoplewearingoffloadingdevicesfordiabetesrelatedfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT backhousemr rehabilitationforpeoplewearingoffloadingdevicesfordiabetesrelatedfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses
AT brucej rehabilitationforpeoplewearingoffloadingdevicesfordiabetesrelatedfootulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalyses