Cargando…

Accuracies of various types of spinal robot in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: With the popularization of robot-assisted spinal surgeries, it is still uncertain whether robots with different designs could lead to different results in the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. This study aimed to compare the pedicle screw inserting accuracies among the spinal surgerie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Lin-Zhen, Wang, Qi-Long, Zhang, Qi, He, Da, Tian, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36966314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03714-8
_version_ 1784912294289866752
author Xie, Lin-Zhen
Wang, Qi-Long
Zhang, Qi
He, Da
Tian, Wei
author_facet Xie, Lin-Zhen
Wang, Qi-Long
Zhang, Qi
He, Da
Tian, Wei
author_sort Xie, Lin-Zhen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the popularization of robot-assisted spinal surgeries, it is still uncertain whether robots with different designs could lead to different results in the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. This study aimed to compare the pedicle screw inserting accuracies among the spinal surgeries assisted by various types of robot and estimate the rank probability of each robot-assisted operative technique involved. METHODS: The electronic literature database of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CNKI, WANFANG and the Cochrane Library was searched in November 2021. The primary outcome was the Gertzbein–Robbins classification of pedicle screws inserted with various operative techniques. After the data extraction and direct meta-analysis process, a network model was established in the Bayesian framework and further analyses were carried out. RESULTS: Among all the 15 eligible RCTs, 4 types of robot device, namely Orthbot, Renaissance, SpineAssist and TiRobot, were included in this study. In the network meta-analysis, the Orthbot group (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.13–0.58), the Renaissance group (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14–0.86), the SpineAssist group (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06–0.34) and the conventional surgery group (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.13–0.31) were inferior to the TiRobot group in the proportion of grade A pedicle screws. Moreover, the results of rank probabilities revealed that in terms of accuracy, the highest-ranked robot was TiRobot, followed by Renaissance and Orthbot. CONCLUSIONS: In general, current RCT evidence indicates that TiRobot has an advantage in the accuracy of the pedicle screw placement, while there is no significant difference among the Orthbot-assisted technique, the Renaissance-assisted technique, the conventional freehand technique, and the SpineAssist-assisted technique in accuracy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-03714-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10039560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100395602023-03-26 Accuracies of various types of spinal robot in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion: a Bayesian network meta-analysis Xie, Lin-Zhen Wang, Qi-Long Zhang, Qi He, Da Tian, Wei J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: With the popularization of robot-assisted spinal surgeries, it is still uncertain whether robots with different designs could lead to different results in the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. This study aimed to compare the pedicle screw inserting accuracies among the spinal surgeries assisted by various types of robot and estimate the rank probability of each robot-assisted operative technique involved. METHODS: The electronic literature database of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CNKI, WANFANG and the Cochrane Library was searched in November 2021. The primary outcome was the Gertzbein–Robbins classification of pedicle screws inserted with various operative techniques. After the data extraction and direct meta-analysis process, a network model was established in the Bayesian framework and further analyses were carried out. RESULTS: Among all the 15 eligible RCTs, 4 types of robot device, namely Orthbot, Renaissance, SpineAssist and TiRobot, were included in this study. In the network meta-analysis, the Orthbot group (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.13–0.58), the Renaissance group (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14–0.86), the SpineAssist group (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06–0.34) and the conventional surgery group (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.13–0.31) were inferior to the TiRobot group in the proportion of grade A pedicle screws. Moreover, the results of rank probabilities revealed that in terms of accuracy, the highest-ranked robot was TiRobot, followed by Renaissance and Orthbot. CONCLUSIONS: In general, current RCT evidence indicates that TiRobot has an advantage in the accuracy of the pedicle screw placement, while there is no significant difference among the Orthbot-assisted technique, the Renaissance-assisted technique, the conventional freehand technique, and the SpineAssist-assisted technique in accuracy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-03714-8. BioMed Central 2023-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10039560/ /pubmed/36966314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03714-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xie, Lin-Zhen
Wang, Qi-Long
Zhang, Qi
He, Da
Tian, Wei
Accuracies of various types of spinal robot in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
title Accuracies of various types of spinal robot in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full Accuracies of various types of spinal robot in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Accuracies of various types of spinal robot in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Accuracies of various types of spinal robot in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_short Accuracies of various types of spinal robot in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_sort accuracies of various types of spinal robot in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion: a bayesian network meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36966314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03714-8
work_keys_str_mv AT xielinzhen accuraciesofvarioustypesofspinalrobotinrobotassistedpediclescrewinsertionabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangqilong accuraciesofvarioustypesofspinalrobotinrobotassistedpediclescrewinsertionabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangqi accuraciesofvarioustypesofspinalrobotinrobotassistedpediclescrewinsertionabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT heda accuraciesofvarioustypesofspinalrobotinrobotassistedpediclescrewinsertionabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT tianwei accuraciesofvarioustypesofspinalrobotinrobotassistedpediclescrewinsertionabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis