Cargando…

Whether the Golgi protein 73 could be a diagnostic serological marker in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta analysis

BACKGROUND: The Value of Golgi protein 73 (GP73) in the diagnosis of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial, especially in its differentiation between HCC and cirrhosis. Besides, some papers showed that GP73 levels are correlated with liver fibrosis. This study conducts a meta-analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xu, Wu, Li-Na, Li, Xiao-Qing, Luo, Xia, Liu, Shui-Wei, Zhang, Le, Nawaz, Shah, Ma, Li-Na, Ding, Xiang-Chun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36964524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02685-8
_version_ 1784912305830494208
author Zhang, Xu
Wu, Li-Na
Li, Xiao-Qing
Luo, Xia
Liu, Shui-Wei
Zhang, Le
Nawaz, Shah
Ma, Li-Na
Ding, Xiang-Chun
author_facet Zhang, Xu
Wu, Li-Na
Li, Xiao-Qing
Luo, Xia
Liu, Shui-Wei
Zhang, Le
Nawaz, Shah
Ma, Li-Na
Ding, Xiang-Chun
author_sort Zhang, Xu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Value of Golgi protein 73 (GP73) in the diagnosis of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial, especially in its differentiation between HCC and cirrhosis. Besides, some papers showed that GP73 levels are correlated with liver fibrosis. This study conducts a meta-analysis to evaluate the value of GP73 in diagnosing HCC and differential diagnosing HCC from liver cirrhosis. METHODS: 36 studies with a sample size of 8314 cases concerning the accuracy of GP73 in the diagnosis of HCC were selected through a systematic review. Seven of these studies included a total of 438 HCC samples and 426 cirrhosis samples and calculated the sensitivity and specificity of GP73 for differential diagnosing HCC from cirrhosis. QUADAS (quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies) was used to evaluate the quality of literature. Statistical analyses were performed using StataSE16 software. RESULTS: The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the curve were 0.79(95%CI 0.74–0.83),0.85(95%CI 0.80–0.89),5.4(95%CI 3.8–7.5), 0.25(95%CI 0.20–0.31), 22(95%CI 13–35), and 0.88 for GP73 diagnosing HCC;0.74(95%CI 0.64–0.81),0.70(95%CI 0.49–0.85),2.40(95%CI 1.3–4.7),0.38(95%CI 0.23–0.61),6(95%CI 2–19), and 0.78 for GP73 differential diagnosing HCC from liver cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that GP73 has a high diagnostic value for HCC and a moderate value for differential diagnosis of HCC from liver cirrhosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10039610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100396102023-03-26 Whether the Golgi protein 73 could be a diagnostic serological marker in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta analysis Zhang, Xu Wu, Li-Na Li, Xiao-Qing Luo, Xia Liu, Shui-Wei Zhang, Le Nawaz, Shah Ma, Li-Na Ding, Xiang-Chun BMC Gastroenterol Research BACKGROUND: The Value of Golgi protein 73 (GP73) in the diagnosis of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial, especially in its differentiation between HCC and cirrhosis. Besides, some papers showed that GP73 levels are correlated with liver fibrosis. This study conducts a meta-analysis to evaluate the value of GP73 in diagnosing HCC and differential diagnosing HCC from liver cirrhosis. METHODS: 36 studies with a sample size of 8314 cases concerning the accuracy of GP73 in the diagnosis of HCC were selected through a systematic review. Seven of these studies included a total of 438 HCC samples and 426 cirrhosis samples and calculated the sensitivity and specificity of GP73 for differential diagnosing HCC from cirrhosis. QUADAS (quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies) was used to evaluate the quality of literature. Statistical analyses were performed using StataSE16 software. RESULTS: The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the curve were 0.79(95%CI 0.74–0.83),0.85(95%CI 0.80–0.89),5.4(95%CI 3.8–7.5), 0.25(95%CI 0.20–0.31), 22(95%CI 13–35), and 0.88 for GP73 diagnosing HCC;0.74(95%CI 0.64–0.81),0.70(95%CI 0.49–0.85),2.40(95%CI 1.3–4.7),0.38(95%CI 0.23–0.61),6(95%CI 2–19), and 0.78 for GP73 differential diagnosing HCC from liver cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that GP73 has a high diagnostic value for HCC and a moderate value for differential diagnosis of HCC from liver cirrhosis. BioMed Central 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10039610/ /pubmed/36964524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02685-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Xu
Wu, Li-Na
Li, Xiao-Qing
Luo, Xia
Liu, Shui-Wei
Zhang, Le
Nawaz, Shah
Ma, Li-Na
Ding, Xiang-Chun
Whether the Golgi protein 73 could be a diagnostic serological marker in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta analysis
title Whether the Golgi protein 73 could be a diagnostic serological marker in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta analysis
title_full Whether the Golgi protein 73 could be a diagnostic serological marker in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta analysis
title_fullStr Whether the Golgi protein 73 could be a diagnostic serological marker in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta analysis
title_full_unstemmed Whether the Golgi protein 73 could be a diagnostic serological marker in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta analysis
title_short Whether the Golgi protein 73 could be a diagnostic serological marker in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta analysis
title_sort whether the golgi protein 73 could be a diagnostic serological marker in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36964524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02685-8
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxu whetherthegolgiprotein73couldbeadiagnosticserologicalmarkerinhepatocellularcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT wulina whetherthegolgiprotein73couldbeadiagnosticserologicalmarkerinhepatocellularcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT lixiaoqing whetherthegolgiprotein73couldbeadiagnosticserologicalmarkerinhepatocellularcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT luoxia whetherthegolgiprotein73couldbeadiagnosticserologicalmarkerinhepatocellularcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT liushuiwei whetherthegolgiprotein73couldbeadiagnosticserologicalmarkerinhepatocellularcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT zhangle whetherthegolgiprotein73couldbeadiagnosticserologicalmarkerinhepatocellularcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT nawazshah whetherthegolgiprotein73couldbeadiagnosticserologicalmarkerinhepatocellularcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT malina whetherthegolgiprotein73couldbeadiagnosticserologicalmarkerinhepatocellularcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT dingxiangchun whetherthegolgiprotein73couldbeadiagnosticserologicalmarkerinhepatocellularcarcinomaametaanalysis