Cargando…

Time-dependent effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular benefits: a real-world study

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have shown cardiovascular benefits in cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the most convincing evidence was obtained in subjects with established cardiovascular (CV) disease. We analyzed the determinants...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piccini, Sara, Favacchio, Giuseppe, Panico, Cristina, Morenghi, Emanuela, Folli, Franco, Mazziotti, Gherardo, Lania, Andrea Gerardo, Mirani, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36966321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01800-z
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have shown cardiovascular benefits in cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the most convincing evidence was obtained in subjects with established cardiovascular (CV) disease. We analyzed the determinants of GLP-1 RA-mediated CV protection in a real-world population of persons with type 2 diabetes with and without a history of CV events with long-term follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 550 individuals with type 2 diabetes (395 in primary CV prevention, 155 in secondary CV prevention), followed at a single center after the first prescription of a GLP-1 RA between 2009 and 2019. CV and metabolic outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Median duration of follow-up was 5.0 years (0.25–10.8) in primary prevention and 3.6 years (0–10.3) in secondary prevention, with a median duration of treatment of 3.2 years (0–10.8) and 2.5 years (0–10.3) respectively. In the multivariable Cox regression model considering GLP-1 RA treatment as a time-dependent covariate, in the primary prevention group, changes in BMI and glycated hemoglobin did not have an impact on MACE risk, while age at the time of GLP-1 initiation (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03–1.14, p = 0.001) and GLP-1 RA cessation by time (HR 3.40, 95% CI 1.82–6.32, p < 0.001) increased the risk of MACE. Regarding the secondary prevention group, only GLP-1 RA cessation by time (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.46–5.01, p = 0.002) increased the risk of MACE. With respect to those who withdrew treatment, subjects who continued the GLP-1 RA had significantly greater weight loss and lower glycated hemoglobin levels during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world type 2 diabetes population, discontinuation of GLP-1 RA treatment was associated to a higher risk of major cardiovascular events, in both subjects with and without a history of CV events.