Cargando…

Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field

Open innovation is now a widely used concept in academia, industry, and policy-making. According to the recent report “The Open Innovation Barometer”, released by the Economist, 90% of organizations have either adopted or are planning to implement key open innovation practices by opening up their or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertello, Alberto, De Bernardi, Paola, Ricciardi, Francesca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039695/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00655-8
_version_ 1784912325056135168
author Bertello, Alberto
De Bernardi, Paola
Ricciardi, Francesca
author_facet Bertello, Alberto
De Bernardi, Paola
Ricciardi, Francesca
author_sort Bertello, Alberto
collection PubMed
description Open innovation is now a widely used concept in academia, industry, and policy-making. According to the recent report “The Open Innovation Barometer”, released by the Economist, 90% of organizations have either adopted or are planning to implement key open innovation practices by opening up their organizational boundaries to collaborative innovation in the next three years (The Economist Group 2022). However, the social and economic changes imposed by the emerging processes of transition towards a more digital and sustainable society raise questions on how the open innovation field of studies is evolving to meet new, emerging needs. By combining bibliometric techniques and content analysis, this study illustrates how this research community has evolved in the last 12 years. More specifically, this study provides a descriptive analysis of the literature on open innovation, defines its knowledge structure, and illustrates a representative picture of the theoretical landscape. Our analysis shows that attempts to consolidate established topics and theoretical approaches in this field of studies go hand in hand with the emergence of new conversations about unexplored dimensions of open innovation. We conclude this article by outlining some avenues for future research on how to conceptualize, theorize, and research (methods and analytical techniques) open innovation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10039695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100396952023-03-27 Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field Bertello, Alberto De Bernardi, Paola Ricciardi, Francesca Rev Manag Sci Review Paper Open innovation is now a widely used concept in academia, industry, and policy-making. According to the recent report “The Open Innovation Barometer”, released by the Economist, 90% of organizations have either adopted or are planning to implement key open innovation practices by opening up their organizational boundaries to collaborative innovation in the next three years (The Economist Group 2022). However, the social and economic changes imposed by the emerging processes of transition towards a more digital and sustainable society raise questions on how the open innovation field of studies is evolving to meet new, emerging needs. By combining bibliometric techniques and content analysis, this study illustrates how this research community has evolved in the last 12 years. More specifically, this study provides a descriptive analysis of the literature on open innovation, defines its knowledge structure, and illustrates a representative picture of the theoretical landscape. Our analysis shows that attempts to consolidate established topics and theoretical approaches in this field of studies go hand in hand with the emergence of new conversations about unexplored dimensions of open innovation. We conclude this article by outlining some avenues for future research on how to conceptualize, theorize, and research (methods and analytical techniques) open innovation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10039695/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00655-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Paper
Bertello, Alberto
De Bernardi, Paola
Ricciardi, Francesca
Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field
title Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field
title_full Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field
title_fullStr Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field
title_full_unstemmed Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field
title_short Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field
title_sort open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039695/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00655-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bertelloalberto openinnovationstatusquoandquovadisananalysisofaresearchfield
AT debernardipaola openinnovationstatusquoandquovadisananalysisofaresearchfield
AT ricciardifrancesca openinnovationstatusquoandquovadisananalysisofaresearchfield