Cargando…
Association between patient-related factors and avoided consultations due to fear of COVID-19 during the first lockdown in northern Germany: Results of a cross-sectional observational study
INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many people were anxious about a coronavirus infection due to the high infection rate and the mortality risk associated with the disease. Fear of COVID-19 might have influenced patients’ utilisation of medical services, even if it meant that a postponed th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier GmbH.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36973162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2023.01.005 |
_version_ | 1784912333934428160 |
---|---|
author | Hansen, Heike Schäfer, Ingmar Dröge, Finn Menzel, Agata Tajdar, Daniel Mayer-Runge, Ulrich Lühmann, Dagmar Scherer, Martin |
author_facet | Hansen, Heike Schäfer, Ingmar Dröge, Finn Menzel, Agata Tajdar, Daniel Mayer-Runge, Ulrich Lühmann, Dagmar Scherer, Martin |
author_sort | Hansen, Heike |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many people were anxious about a coronavirus infection due to the high infection rate and the mortality risk associated with the disease. Fear of COVID-19 might have influenced patients’ utilisation of medical services, even if it meant that a postponed therapy had severe consequences. Our aims were to analyse (a) to what extent fear of COVID-19 contributes to forgone consultations, (b) if patient characteristics, health literacy and social support influence the effect of fear of COVID-19 on the utilisation behaviour and (c) whether interactions between these possible predictor variables are responsible for a higher extent of avoided consultations due to fear of COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional observational study in an emergency department. The study was based on personal standardized interviews of patients. The interviews took place between July 15 and August 5, 2020. Patients over the age of 18 were included if there was no urgent need for treatment on the day of the interview, no severe functional limitations, sufficient knowledge of German, ability to consent and health problems requiring treatment between March 13 and June 13, 2020. Differences between patient subgroups were described and analysed using the t-test and chi(2) test. Data were analysed by logistic regression including socio-demographic data, health literacy and social support assessed by standardised instruments. Additionally, we assessed interactions between possible predictor variables by a descriptive tree analysis. RESULTS: 103 patients participated in personal standardized interviews. 46 patients (44.6%) reported that at least one necessary consultation did not take place in the observation period. Among those, 29 patients (63.0%) avoided consultations due to fear of COVID-19. Women had 3.36 times higher odds (95% confidence interval: 1.25 to 9.04, p = 0.017) for avoiding a consultation due to fear of COVID-19. There were no other statistically significant predictors in our analysis. DISCUSSION: Almost half of the required consultations did not take place. Avoidance of consultations needs to be closely monitored during the pandemic. Policy makers as well as health care providers should give consideration to the collateral effects of COVID-19 and COVID-19-related reactions of patients, especially women. CONCLUSION: In the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, physicians should ensure that their patients take advantage of necessary consultations in order to avoid negative effects of a delayed examination or treatment. Particular attention should be paid to anxious female patients. Studies are needed to analyse the association between health literacy, social support and avoidance of consultations triggered by fear of COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10039736 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier GmbH. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100397362023-03-27 Association between patient-related factors and avoided consultations due to fear of COVID-19 during the first lockdown in northern Germany: Results of a cross-sectional observational study Hansen, Heike Schäfer, Ingmar Dröge, Finn Menzel, Agata Tajdar, Daniel Mayer-Runge, Ulrich Lühmann, Dagmar Scherer, Martin Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes Versorgungsforschung / Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many people were anxious about a coronavirus infection due to the high infection rate and the mortality risk associated with the disease. Fear of COVID-19 might have influenced patients’ utilisation of medical services, even if it meant that a postponed therapy had severe consequences. Our aims were to analyse (a) to what extent fear of COVID-19 contributes to forgone consultations, (b) if patient characteristics, health literacy and social support influence the effect of fear of COVID-19 on the utilisation behaviour and (c) whether interactions between these possible predictor variables are responsible for a higher extent of avoided consultations due to fear of COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional observational study in an emergency department. The study was based on personal standardized interviews of patients. The interviews took place between July 15 and August 5, 2020. Patients over the age of 18 were included if there was no urgent need for treatment on the day of the interview, no severe functional limitations, sufficient knowledge of German, ability to consent and health problems requiring treatment between March 13 and June 13, 2020. Differences between patient subgroups were described and analysed using the t-test and chi(2) test. Data were analysed by logistic regression including socio-demographic data, health literacy and social support assessed by standardised instruments. Additionally, we assessed interactions between possible predictor variables by a descriptive tree analysis. RESULTS: 103 patients participated in personal standardized interviews. 46 patients (44.6%) reported that at least one necessary consultation did not take place in the observation period. Among those, 29 patients (63.0%) avoided consultations due to fear of COVID-19. Women had 3.36 times higher odds (95% confidence interval: 1.25 to 9.04, p = 0.017) for avoiding a consultation due to fear of COVID-19. There were no other statistically significant predictors in our analysis. DISCUSSION: Almost half of the required consultations did not take place. Avoidance of consultations needs to be closely monitored during the pandemic. Policy makers as well as health care providers should give consideration to the collateral effects of COVID-19 and COVID-19-related reactions of patients, especially women. CONCLUSION: In the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, physicians should ensure that their patients take advantage of necessary consultations in order to avoid negative effects of a delayed examination or treatment. Particular attention should be paid to anxious female patients. Studies are needed to analyse the association between health literacy, social support and avoidance of consultations triggered by fear of COVID-19. Published by Elsevier GmbH. 2023-05 2023-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10039736/ /pubmed/36973162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2023.01.005 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier GmbH. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Versorgungsforschung / Health Services Research Hansen, Heike Schäfer, Ingmar Dröge, Finn Menzel, Agata Tajdar, Daniel Mayer-Runge, Ulrich Lühmann, Dagmar Scherer, Martin Association between patient-related factors and avoided consultations due to fear of COVID-19 during the first lockdown in northern Germany: Results of a cross-sectional observational study |
title | Association between patient-related factors and avoided consultations due to fear of COVID-19 during the first lockdown in northern Germany: Results of a cross-sectional observational study |
title_full | Association between patient-related factors and avoided consultations due to fear of COVID-19 during the first lockdown in northern Germany: Results of a cross-sectional observational study |
title_fullStr | Association between patient-related factors and avoided consultations due to fear of COVID-19 during the first lockdown in northern Germany: Results of a cross-sectional observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Association between patient-related factors and avoided consultations due to fear of COVID-19 during the first lockdown in northern Germany: Results of a cross-sectional observational study |
title_short | Association between patient-related factors and avoided consultations due to fear of COVID-19 during the first lockdown in northern Germany: Results of a cross-sectional observational study |
title_sort | association between patient-related factors and avoided consultations due to fear of covid-19 during the first lockdown in northern germany: results of a cross-sectional observational study |
topic | Versorgungsforschung / Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36973162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2023.01.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansenheike associationbetweenpatientrelatedfactorsandavoidedconsultationsduetofearofcovid19duringthefirstlockdowninnortherngermanyresultsofacrosssectionalobservationalstudy AT schaferingmar associationbetweenpatientrelatedfactorsandavoidedconsultationsduetofearofcovid19duringthefirstlockdowninnortherngermanyresultsofacrosssectionalobservationalstudy AT drogefinn associationbetweenpatientrelatedfactorsandavoidedconsultationsduetofearofcovid19duringthefirstlockdowninnortherngermanyresultsofacrosssectionalobservationalstudy AT menzelagata associationbetweenpatientrelatedfactorsandavoidedconsultationsduetofearofcovid19duringthefirstlockdowninnortherngermanyresultsofacrosssectionalobservationalstudy AT tajdardaniel associationbetweenpatientrelatedfactorsandavoidedconsultationsduetofearofcovid19duringthefirstlockdowninnortherngermanyresultsofacrosssectionalobservationalstudy AT mayerrungeulrich associationbetweenpatientrelatedfactorsandavoidedconsultationsduetofearofcovid19duringthefirstlockdowninnortherngermanyresultsofacrosssectionalobservationalstudy AT luhmanndagmar associationbetweenpatientrelatedfactorsandavoidedconsultationsduetofearofcovid19duringthefirstlockdowninnortherngermanyresultsofacrosssectionalobservationalstudy AT scherermartin associationbetweenpatientrelatedfactorsandavoidedconsultationsduetofearofcovid19duringthefirstlockdowninnortherngermanyresultsofacrosssectionalobservationalstudy |