Cargando…

Does globalization and energy usage influence carbon emissions in South Asia? An empirical revisit of the debate

The 2030 United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13 agenda hinges on attaining a sustainable environment with the need to “take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts”. Hence, this study empirically revisits the debate on the effect of nonrenewable energy and globalization...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adeleye, Bosede Ngozi, Akam, Darlington, Inuwa, Nasiru, James, Henry Tumba, Basila, Denis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36547846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24457-9
_version_ 1784912350000709632
author Adeleye, Bosede Ngozi
Akam, Darlington
Inuwa, Nasiru
James, Henry Tumba
Basila, Denis
author_facet Adeleye, Bosede Ngozi
Akam, Darlington
Inuwa, Nasiru
James, Henry Tumba
Basila, Denis
author_sort Adeleye, Bosede Ngozi
collection PubMed
description The 2030 United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13 agenda hinges on attaining a sustainable environment with the need to “take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts”. Hence, this study empirically revisits the debate on the effect of nonrenewable energy and globalization on carbon emissions within the framework of the Kuznets hypothesis using an unbalanced panel data from seven South Asian countries (Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka) covering 1980–2019. The variables of interest are carbon emissions measured in metric tons per capita, energy use measured as kg of oil equivalent per capita, and globalization index. To address five main objectives, we deploy four techniques: panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE), feasible generalized least squares (FGLS), quantile regression (QR), and fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS). For the most part, the findings reveal that the (1) inverted U-shaped energy-Kuznets curve holds; (2) U-shaped globalization-Kuznets curve is evident; (3) inverted U-shaped turning points for nonrenewable energy are 496.03 and 640.84, while for globalization are 38.83 and 39.04, respectively; (4) globalization-emission relationship indicates a U-shaped relationship at the median and 75th quantile; and (5) inverted U-shaped energy-Kuznets holds in Pakistan but a U-shaped nexus prevails in Nepal and Sri Lanka; inverted U-shaped globalization-Kuznets holds in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, but U-shaped nexus is evident in Bhutan, Maldives, and Nepal. Deductively, our results show that South Asia countries (at early stage of development) are faced with the hazardous substance that deteriorates human health. Moreover, the non-linear square term of the nonrenewable energy-emissions relationship is negative, which validates the inverted U-shaped EKC theory. Overall, the effect of energy and globalization on carbon emissions is opposite while the consistency at the 75th quantile result indicates that countries with intense globalization are prone to environmental degradation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10039819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100398192023-03-27 Does globalization and energy usage influence carbon emissions in South Asia? An empirical revisit of the debate Adeleye, Bosede Ngozi Akam, Darlington Inuwa, Nasiru James, Henry Tumba Basila, Denis Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Research Article The 2030 United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13 agenda hinges on attaining a sustainable environment with the need to “take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts”. Hence, this study empirically revisits the debate on the effect of nonrenewable energy and globalization on carbon emissions within the framework of the Kuznets hypothesis using an unbalanced panel data from seven South Asian countries (Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka) covering 1980–2019. The variables of interest are carbon emissions measured in metric tons per capita, energy use measured as kg of oil equivalent per capita, and globalization index. To address five main objectives, we deploy four techniques: panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE), feasible generalized least squares (FGLS), quantile regression (QR), and fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS). For the most part, the findings reveal that the (1) inverted U-shaped energy-Kuznets curve holds; (2) U-shaped globalization-Kuznets curve is evident; (3) inverted U-shaped turning points for nonrenewable energy are 496.03 and 640.84, while for globalization are 38.83 and 39.04, respectively; (4) globalization-emission relationship indicates a U-shaped relationship at the median and 75th quantile; and (5) inverted U-shaped energy-Kuznets holds in Pakistan but a U-shaped nexus prevails in Nepal and Sri Lanka; inverted U-shaped globalization-Kuznets holds in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, but U-shaped nexus is evident in Bhutan, Maldives, and Nepal. Deductively, our results show that South Asia countries (at early stage of development) are faced with the hazardous substance that deteriorates human health. Moreover, the non-linear square term of the nonrenewable energy-emissions relationship is negative, which validates the inverted U-shaped EKC theory. Overall, the effect of energy and globalization on carbon emissions is opposite while the consistency at the 75th quantile result indicates that countries with intense globalization are prone to environmental degradation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10039819/ /pubmed/36547846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24457-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Adeleye, Bosede Ngozi
Akam, Darlington
Inuwa, Nasiru
James, Henry Tumba
Basila, Denis
Does globalization and energy usage influence carbon emissions in South Asia? An empirical revisit of the debate
title Does globalization and energy usage influence carbon emissions in South Asia? An empirical revisit of the debate
title_full Does globalization and energy usage influence carbon emissions in South Asia? An empirical revisit of the debate
title_fullStr Does globalization and energy usage influence carbon emissions in South Asia? An empirical revisit of the debate
title_full_unstemmed Does globalization and energy usage influence carbon emissions in South Asia? An empirical revisit of the debate
title_short Does globalization and energy usage influence carbon emissions in South Asia? An empirical revisit of the debate
title_sort does globalization and energy usage influence carbon emissions in south asia? an empirical revisit of the debate
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36547846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24457-9
work_keys_str_mv AT adeleyebosedengozi doesglobalizationandenergyusageinfluencecarbonemissionsinsouthasiaanempiricalrevisitofthedebate
AT akamdarlington doesglobalizationandenergyusageinfluencecarbonemissionsinsouthasiaanempiricalrevisitofthedebate
AT inuwanasiru doesglobalizationandenergyusageinfluencecarbonemissionsinsouthasiaanempiricalrevisitofthedebate
AT jameshenrytumba doesglobalizationandenergyusageinfluencecarbonemissionsinsouthasiaanempiricalrevisitofthedebate
AT basiladenis doesglobalizationandenergyusageinfluencecarbonemissionsinsouthasiaanempiricalrevisitofthedebate