Cargando…

The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study

PURPOSE: Navigation has been suggested to guide complex benign bone tumor curettage procedures, but the contribution of navigation to the accuracy of curettage has never been quantified. We explored the accuracy of navigated curettage in a cadaveric observational pilot study, comparing navigated to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Steenbergen, Thomas R. F., Nijsink, Han, Eggen, Thomas G. E., Janssen, Dennis, Rovers, Maroeska M., van der Geest, Ingrid C. M., Fütterer, J. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36327031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02741-w
_version_ 1784912354015707136
author van Steenbergen, Thomas R. F.
Nijsink, Han
Eggen, Thomas G. E.
Janssen, Dennis
Rovers, Maroeska M.
van der Geest, Ingrid C. M.
Fütterer, J. J.
author_facet van Steenbergen, Thomas R. F.
Nijsink, Han
Eggen, Thomas G. E.
Janssen, Dennis
Rovers, Maroeska M.
van der Geest, Ingrid C. M.
Fütterer, J. J.
author_sort van Steenbergen, Thomas R. F.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Navigation has been suggested to guide complex benign bone tumor curettage procedures, but the contribution of navigation to the accuracy of curettage has never been quantified. We explored the accuracy of navigated curettage in a cadaveric observational pilot study, comparing navigated to freehand curettage, performed independently by an expert and a novice user. METHODS: The expert performed curettage on 20 cadaveric bones prepared with a paraffin wax mixture tumor, 10 freehand and 10 navigated. We re-used 12 bones for the novice experiments, 6 freehand and 6 navigated. Tumor and curettage cavity volumes were segmented on pre- and post-cone-beam CT scans. Accuracy was quantified using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), and with remaining tumor volume, bone curettage volume, maximal remaining width and procedure times compared between navigation and freehand groups for both users. RESULTS: There were little differences in curettage accuracy between a navigated (DSC 0.59[0.17]) and freehand (DSC 0.64[0.10]) approach for an expert user, but there were for a novice user with DSC 0.67(0.14) and 0.83(0.06), respectively. All navigated and freehand procedures had some amount of remaining tumor, generally located in a few isolated spots with means of 2.2(2.6) cm(3) (mean 20% of the tumor volume) and 1.5(1.4) cm(3) (18%), respectively, for the expert and more diffusely spaced with means of 5.1(2.8) cm(3) (33%) and 3.0(2.2) cm(3) (17%), respectively, for the novice. CONCLUSIONS: In an explorative study on 20 cadaveric bone tumor models, navigated curettage in its current setup was not more accurate than freehand curettage. The amount of remaining tumor, however, confirms that curettage could be further improved. The novice user was less accurate using navigation than freehand, which could be explained by the learning curve. Furthermore, the expert used a different surgical approach than the novice, focusing more on removing the entire tumor than sparing surrounding bone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10039836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100398362023-03-27 The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study van Steenbergen, Thomas R. F. Nijsink, Han Eggen, Thomas G. E. Janssen, Dennis Rovers, Maroeska M. van der Geest, Ingrid C. M. Fütterer, J. J. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Navigation has been suggested to guide complex benign bone tumor curettage procedures, but the contribution of navigation to the accuracy of curettage has never been quantified. We explored the accuracy of navigated curettage in a cadaveric observational pilot study, comparing navigated to freehand curettage, performed independently by an expert and a novice user. METHODS: The expert performed curettage on 20 cadaveric bones prepared with a paraffin wax mixture tumor, 10 freehand and 10 navigated. We re-used 12 bones for the novice experiments, 6 freehand and 6 navigated. Tumor and curettage cavity volumes were segmented on pre- and post-cone-beam CT scans. Accuracy was quantified using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), and with remaining tumor volume, bone curettage volume, maximal remaining width and procedure times compared between navigation and freehand groups for both users. RESULTS: There were little differences in curettage accuracy between a navigated (DSC 0.59[0.17]) and freehand (DSC 0.64[0.10]) approach for an expert user, but there were for a novice user with DSC 0.67(0.14) and 0.83(0.06), respectively. All navigated and freehand procedures had some amount of remaining tumor, generally located in a few isolated spots with means of 2.2(2.6) cm(3) (mean 20% of the tumor volume) and 1.5(1.4) cm(3) (18%), respectively, for the expert and more diffusely spaced with means of 5.1(2.8) cm(3) (33%) and 3.0(2.2) cm(3) (17%), respectively, for the novice. CONCLUSIONS: In an explorative study on 20 cadaveric bone tumor models, navigated curettage in its current setup was not more accurate than freehand curettage. The amount of remaining tumor, however, confirms that curettage could be further improved. The novice user was less accurate using navigation than freehand, which could be explained by the learning curve. Furthermore, the expert used a different surgical approach than the novice, focusing more on removing the entire tumor than sparing surrounding bone. Springer International Publishing 2022-11-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10039836/ /pubmed/36327031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02741-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
van Steenbergen, Thomas R. F.
Nijsink, Han
Eggen, Thomas G. E.
Janssen, Dennis
Rovers, Maroeska M.
van der Geest, Ingrid C. M.
Fütterer, J. J.
The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study
title The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study
title_full The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study
title_fullStr The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study
title_short The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study
title_sort accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36327031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02741-w
work_keys_str_mv AT vansteenbergenthomasrf theaccuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy
AT nijsinkhan theaccuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy
AT eggenthomasge theaccuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy
AT janssendennis theaccuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy
AT roversmaroeskam theaccuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy
AT vandergeestingridcm theaccuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy
AT futtererjj theaccuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy
AT vansteenbergenthomasrf accuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy
AT nijsinkhan accuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy
AT eggenthomasge accuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy
AT janssendennis accuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy
AT roversmaroeskam accuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy
AT vandergeestingridcm accuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy
AT futtererjj accuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy