Cargando…
The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study
PURPOSE: Navigation has been suggested to guide complex benign bone tumor curettage procedures, but the contribution of navigation to the accuracy of curettage has never been quantified. We explored the accuracy of navigated curettage in a cadaveric observational pilot study, comparing navigated to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36327031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02741-w |
_version_ | 1784912354015707136 |
---|---|
author | van Steenbergen, Thomas R. F. Nijsink, Han Eggen, Thomas G. E. Janssen, Dennis Rovers, Maroeska M. van der Geest, Ingrid C. M. Fütterer, J. J. |
author_facet | van Steenbergen, Thomas R. F. Nijsink, Han Eggen, Thomas G. E. Janssen, Dennis Rovers, Maroeska M. van der Geest, Ingrid C. M. Fütterer, J. J. |
author_sort | van Steenbergen, Thomas R. F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Navigation has been suggested to guide complex benign bone tumor curettage procedures, but the contribution of navigation to the accuracy of curettage has never been quantified. We explored the accuracy of navigated curettage in a cadaveric observational pilot study, comparing navigated to freehand curettage, performed independently by an expert and a novice user. METHODS: The expert performed curettage on 20 cadaveric bones prepared with a paraffin wax mixture tumor, 10 freehand and 10 navigated. We re-used 12 bones for the novice experiments, 6 freehand and 6 navigated. Tumor and curettage cavity volumes were segmented on pre- and post-cone-beam CT scans. Accuracy was quantified using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), and with remaining tumor volume, bone curettage volume, maximal remaining width and procedure times compared between navigation and freehand groups for both users. RESULTS: There were little differences in curettage accuracy between a navigated (DSC 0.59[0.17]) and freehand (DSC 0.64[0.10]) approach for an expert user, but there were for a novice user with DSC 0.67(0.14) and 0.83(0.06), respectively. All navigated and freehand procedures had some amount of remaining tumor, generally located in a few isolated spots with means of 2.2(2.6) cm(3) (mean 20% of the tumor volume) and 1.5(1.4) cm(3) (18%), respectively, for the expert and more diffusely spaced with means of 5.1(2.8) cm(3) (33%) and 3.0(2.2) cm(3) (17%), respectively, for the novice. CONCLUSIONS: In an explorative study on 20 cadaveric bone tumor models, navigated curettage in its current setup was not more accurate than freehand curettage. The amount of remaining tumor, however, confirms that curettage could be further improved. The novice user was less accurate using navigation than freehand, which could be explained by the learning curve. Furthermore, the expert used a different surgical approach than the novice, focusing more on removing the entire tumor than sparing surrounding bone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10039836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100398362023-03-27 The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study van Steenbergen, Thomas R. F. Nijsink, Han Eggen, Thomas G. E. Janssen, Dennis Rovers, Maroeska M. van der Geest, Ingrid C. M. Fütterer, J. J. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Navigation has been suggested to guide complex benign bone tumor curettage procedures, but the contribution of navigation to the accuracy of curettage has never been quantified. We explored the accuracy of navigated curettage in a cadaveric observational pilot study, comparing navigated to freehand curettage, performed independently by an expert and a novice user. METHODS: The expert performed curettage on 20 cadaveric bones prepared with a paraffin wax mixture tumor, 10 freehand and 10 navigated. We re-used 12 bones for the novice experiments, 6 freehand and 6 navigated. Tumor and curettage cavity volumes were segmented on pre- and post-cone-beam CT scans. Accuracy was quantified using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), and with remaining tumor volume, bone curettage volume, maximal remaining width and procedure times compared between navigation and freehand groups for both users. RESULTS: There were little differences in curettage accuracy between a navigated (DSC 0.59[0.17]) and freehand (DSC 0.64[0.10]) approach for an expert user, but there were for a novice user with DSC 0.67(0.14) and 0.83(0.06), respectively. All navigated and freehand procedures had some amount of remaining tumor, generally located in a few isolated spots with means of 2.2(2.6) cm(3) (mean 20% of the tumor volume) and 1.5(1.4) cm(3) (18%), respectively, for the expert and more diffusely spaced with means of 5.1(2.8) cm(3) (33%) and 3.0(2.2) cm(3) (17%), respectively, for the novice. CONCLUSIONS: In an explorative study on 20 cadaveric bone tumor models, navigated curettage in its current setup was not more accurate than freehand curettage. The amount of remaining tumor, however, confirms that curettage could be further improved. The novice user was less accurate using navigation than freehand, which could be explained by the learning curve. Furthermore, the expert used a different surgical approach than the novice, focusing more on removing the entire tumor than sparing surrounding bone. Springer International Publishing 2022-11-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10039836/ /pubmed/36327031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02741-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article van Steenbergen, Thomas R. F. Nijsink, Han Eggen, Thomas G. E. Janssen, Dennis Rovers, Maroeska M. van der Geest, Ingrid C. M. Fütterer, J. J. The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study |
title | The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study |
title_full | The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study |
title_fullStr | The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study |
title_full_unstemmed | The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study |
title_short | The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study |
title_sort | accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36327031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02741-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vansteenbergenthomasrf theaccuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy AT nijsinkhan theaccuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy AT eggenthomasge theaccuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy AT janssendennis theaccuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy AT roversmaroeskam theaccuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy AT vandergeestingridcm theaccuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy AT futtererjj theaccuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy AT vansteenbergenthomasrf accuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy AT nijsinkhan accuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy AT eggenthomasge accuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy AT janssendennis accuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy AT roversmaroeskam accuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy AT vandergeestingridcm accuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy AT futtererjj accuracyofnavigatedversusfreehandcurettageinbonetumorsacadavericmodelstudy |