Cargando…

Recognition and Management of Hospital-Acquired Sepsis Among Older General Medical Inpatients: A Multi-Site Retrospective Study

PURPOSE: To assess accuracy of early diagnosis, appropriateness and timeliness of response, and clinical outcomes of older general medical inpatients with hospital-acquired sepsis. METHODS: Hospital abstracts of inpatient encounters from seven digital Queensland public hospitals between July 2018 an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barker, Nicholas, Scott, Ian A, Seaton, Robert, Mehta, Naitik, Kalke, Vikrant R, Redpath, Lyndell
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36987405
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S400839
_version_ 1784912382725718016
author Barker, Nicholas
Scott, Ian A
Seaton, Robert
Mehta, Naitik
Kalke, Vikrant R
Redpath, Lyndell
author_facet Barker, Nicholas
Scott, Ian A
Seaton, Robert
Mehta, Naitik
Kalke, Vikrant R
Redpath, Lyndell
author_sort Barker, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess accuracy of early diagnosis, appropriateness and timeliness of response, and clinical outcomes of older general medical inpatients with hospital-acquired sepsis. METHODS: Hospital abstracts of inpatient encounters from seven digital Queensland public hospitals between July 2018 and September 2020 were screened retrospectively for diagnoses of hospital-acquired sepsis. Electronic medical records were retrieved and cases meeting selection criteria and classified as confirmed or probable sepsis using pre-specified criteria were included. Investigations and treatments following the first digitally generated alert of clinical deterioration were compared with a best practice sepsis care bundle. Outcome measures comprised 30-day all-cause mortality after deterioration, and unplanned readmissions at 14 days after discharge. RESULTS: Of the 169 screened care episodes, 59 comprised probable or confirmed cases of sepsis treated by general medicine teams at the time of initial deterioration. Of these, 43 (72.9%) had no mention of sepsis in the differential diagnosis on first medical review, and only 38 (64%) were managed as having sepsis. Each care bundle component of blood cultures, serum lactate, and intravenous fluid resuscitation and antibiotics was only delivered in approximately 30% of cases, and antibiotic administration was delayed more than an hour in 28 of 38 (73.7%) cases. CONCLUSION: Early recognition of sepsis and timely implementation of care bundles are challenging in older general medical patients. Education programs in sepsis care standards targeting nurses and junior medical staff, closer patient monitoring, and post-discharge follow-up may improve patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10039973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100399732023-03-27 Recognition and Management of Hospital-Acquired Sepsis Among Older General Medical Inpatients: A Multi-Site Retrospective Study Barker, Nicholas Scott, Ian A Seaton, Robert Mehta, Naitik Kalke, Vikrant R Redpath, Lyndell Int J Gen Med Original Research PURPOSE: To assess accuracy of early diagnosis, appropriateness and timeliness of response, and clinical outcomes of older general medical inpatients with hospital-acquired sepsis. METHODS: Hospital abstracts of inpatient encounters from seven digital Queensland public hospitals between July 2018 and September 2020 were screened retrospectively for diagnoses of hospital-acquired sepsis. Electronic medical records were retrieved and cases meeting selection criteria and classified as confirmed or probable sepsis using pre-specified criteria were included. Investigations and treatments following the first digitally generated alert of clinical deterioration were compared with a best practice sepsis care bundle. Outcome measures comprised 30-day all-cause mortality after deterioration, and unplanned readmissions at 14 days after discharge. RESULTS: Of the 169 screened care episodes, 59 comprised probable or confirmed cases of sepsis treated by general medicine teams at the time of initial deterioration. Of these, 43 (72.9%) had no mention of sepsis in the differential diagnosis on first medical review, and only 38 (64%) were managed as having sepsis. Each care bundle component of blood cultures, serum lactate, and intravenous fluid resuscitation and antibiotics was only delivered in approximately 30% of cases, and antibiotic administration was delayed more than an hour in 28 of 38 (73.7%) cases. CONCLUSION: Early recognition of sepsis and timely implementation of care bundles are challenging in older general medical patients. Education programs in sepsis care standards targeting nurses and junior medical staff, closer patient monitoring, and post-discharge follow-up may improve patient outcomes. Dove 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10039973/ /pubmed/36987405 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S400839 Text en © 2023 Barker et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Barker, Nicholas
Scott, Ian A
Seaton, Robert
Mehta, Naitik
Kalke, Vikrant R
Redpath, Lyndell
Recognition and Management of Hospital-Acquired Sepsis Among Older General Medical Inpatients: A Multi-Site Retrospective Study
title Recognition and Management of Hospital-Acquired Sepsis Among Older General Medical Inpatients: A Multi-Site Retrospective Study
title_full Recognition and Management of Hospital-Acquired Sepsis Among Older General Medical Inpatients: A Multi-Site Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Recognition and Management of Hospital-Acquired Sepsis Among Older General Medical Inpatients: A Multi-Site Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Recognition and Management of Hospital-Acquired Sepsis Among Older General Medical Inpatients: A Multi-Site Retrospective Study
title_short Recognition and Management of Hospital-Acquired Sepsis Among Older General Medical Inpatients: A Multi-Site Retrospective Study
title_sort recognition and management of hospital-acquired sepsis among older general medical inpatients: a multi-site retrospective study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36987405
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S400839
work_keys_str_mv AT barkernicholas recognitionandmanagementofhospitalacquiredsepsisamongoldergeneralmedicalinpatientsamultisiteretrospectivestudy
AT scottiana recognitionandmanagementofhospitalacquiredsepsisamongoldergeneralmedicalinpatientsamultisiteretrospectivestudy
AT seatonrobert recognitionandmanagementofhospitalacquiredsepsisamongoldergeneralmedicalinpatientsamultisiteretrospectivestudy
AT mehtanaitik recognitionandmanagementofhospitalacquiredsepsisamongoldergeneralmedicalinpatientsamultisiteretrospectivestudy
AT kalkevikrantr recognitionandmanagementofhospitalacquiredsepsisamongoldergeneralmedicalinpatientsamultisiteretrospectivestudy
AT redpathlyndell recognitionandmanagementofhospitalacquiredsepsisamongoldergeneralmedicalinpatientsamultisiteretrospectivestudy