Cargando…

Are there inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions for adults in the UK? Protocol for an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: It is important to identify whether behavioural weight management interventions work well across different groups in the population so health inequalities in obesity are not widened. Previous systematic reviews of inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birch, Jack M, Mueller, Julia, Sharp, Stephen, Logue, Jennifer, Kelly, Michael P, Griffin, Simon J, Ahern, Amy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36958788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067607
_version_ 1784912386930507776
author Birch, Jack M
Mueller, Julia
Sharp, Stephen
Logue, Jennifer
Kelly, Michael P
Griffin, Simon J
Ahern, Amy
author_facet Birch, Jack M
Mueller, Julia
Sharp, Stephen
Logue, Jennifer
Kelly, Michael P
Griffin, Simon J
Ahern, Amy
author_sort Birch, Jack M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: It is important to identify whether behavioural weight management interventions work well across different groups in the population so health inequalities in obesity are not widened. Previous systematic reviews of inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions have been limited because few trials report relevant analyses and heterogeneity in the categorisation of inequality characteristics prevents meta-analysis. An individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) allows us to reanalyse all trials with available data in a uniform way. We aim to conduct an IPD meta-analysis of UK randomised controlled trials to examine whether there are inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a recently published systematic review, we identified 17 UK-based randomised controlled trials of primary care-relevant behavioural interventions, conducted in adults living with overweight or obesity and reporting weight outcomes at baseline and 1-year follow-up. The corresponding author of each trial will be invited to contribute data to the IPD-MA. The outcomes of interest are weight at 12-months and intervention attendance (number of sessions offered vs number of sessions attended). We will primarily consider whether there is an interaction between intervention group and characteristics where inequalities occur, such as by gender/sex, socioeconomic status or age. The IPD-MA will be conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of IPD guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No further ethical approval was required as ethical approval for each individual study was obtained by the original trial investigators from appropriate ethics committees. The completed IPD-MA will be disseminated at conferences, in a peer-reviewed journal and contribute to the lead author’s PhD thesis. Investigators of each individual study included in the final IPD-MA will be invited to collaborate on any publications that arise from the project.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10039995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100399952023-03-27 Are there inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions for adults in the UK? Protocol for an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis Birch, Jack M Mueller, Julia Sharp, Stephen Logue, Jennifer Kelly, Michael P Griffin, Simon J Ahern, Amy BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: It is important to identify whether behavioural weight management interventions work well across different groups in the population so health inequalities in obesity are not widened. Previous systematic reviews of inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions have been limited because few trials report relevant analyses and heterogeneity in the categorisation of inequality characteristics prevents meta-analysis. An individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) allows us to reanalyse all trials with available data in a uniform way. We aim to conduct an IPD meta-analysis of UK randomised controlled trials to examine whether there are inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a recently published systematic review, we identified 17 UK-based randomised controlled trials of primary care-relevant behavioural interventions, conducted in adults living with overweight or obesity and reporting weight outcomes at baseline and 1-year follow-up. The corresponding author of each trial will be invited to contribute data to the IPD-MA. The outcomes of interest are weight at 12-months and intervention attendance (number of sessions offered vs number of sessions attended). We will primarily consider whether there is an interaction between intervention group and characteristics where inequalities occur, such as by gender/sex, socioeconomic status or age. The IPD-MA will be conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of IPD guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No further ethical approval was required as ethical approval for each individual study was obtained by the original trial investigators from appropriate ethics committees. The completed IPD-MA will be disseminated at conferences, in a peer-reviewed journal and contribute to the lead author’s PhD thesis. Investigators of each individual study included in the final IPD-MA will be invited to collaborate on any publications that arise from the project. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10039995/ /pubmed/36958788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067607 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Birch, Jack M
Mueller, Julia
Sharp, Stephen
Logue, Jennifer
Kelly, Michael P
Griffin, Simon J
Ahern, Amy
Are there inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions for adults in the UK? Protocol for an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis
title Are there inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions for adults in the UK? Protocol for an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis
title_full Are there inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions for adults in the UK? Protocol for an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis
title_fullStr Are there inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions for adults in the UK? Protocol for an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Are there inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions for adults in the UK? Protocol for an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis
title_short Are there inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions for adults in the UK? Protocol for an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis
title_sort are there inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions for adults in the uk? protocol for an individual participant data (ipd) meta-analysis
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36958788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067607
work_keys_str_mv AT birchjackm arethereinequalitiesintheattendanceandeffectivenessofbehaviouralweightmanagementinterventionsforadultsintheukprotocolforanindividualparticipantdataipdmetaanalysis
AT muellerjulia arethereinequalitiesintheattendanceandeffectivenessofbehaviouralweightmanagementinterventionsforadultsintheukprotocolforanindividualparticipantdataipdmetaanalysis
AT sharpstephen arethereinequalitiesintheattendanceandeffectivenessofbehaviouralweightmanagementinterventionsforadultsintheukprotocolforanindividualparticipantdataipdmetaanalysis
AT loguejennifer arethereinequalitiesintheattendanceandeffectivenessofbehaviouralweightmanagementinterventionsforadultsintheukprotocolforanindividualparticipantdataipdmetaanalysis
AT kellymichaelp arethereinequalitiesintheattendanceandeffectivenessofbehaviouralweightmanagementinterventionsforadultsintheukprotocolforanindividualparticipantdataipdmetaanalysis
AT griffinsimonj arethereinequalitiesintheattendanceandeffectivenessofbehaviouralweightmanagementinterventionsforadultsintheukprotocolforanindividualparticipantdataipdmetaanalysis
AT ahernamy arethereinequalitiesintheattendanceandeffectivenessofbehaviouralweightmanagementinterventionsforadultsintheukprotocolforanindividualparticipantdataipdmetaanalysis