Cargando…

Cognitive impairment and behavioural emergencies within the acute hospital setting

BACKGROUND: Patients with cognitive impairment exhibiting agitation and aggression are challenging to manage in the acute hospital setting. When a patient’s behaviours place themselves or others at risk of harm, a Clinical Aggression Response Team (C-ART) is dispatched. The aims of this project were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ilievski, Vasko, Barrett, Tomiko, Lawson, William, Hoyland, Shane, Tran, Kelvin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36958790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002034
_version_ 1784912396652904448
author Ilievski, Vasko
Barrett, Tomiko
Lawson, William
Hoyland, Shane
Tran, Kelvin
author_facet Ilievski, Vasko
Barrett, Tomiko
Lawson, William
Hoyland, Shane
Tran, Kelvin
author_sort Ilievski, Vasko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with cognitive impairment exhibiting agitation and aggression are challenging to manage in the acute hospital setting. When a patient’s behaviours place themselves or others at risk of harm, a Clinical Aggression Response Team (C-ART) is dispatched. The aims of this project were to describe the characteristics of patients receiving a C-ART call and the experiences of C-ART staff members via semistructured interviews. Additionally, to audit local practice against two established standards of practice (Local C-ART Call Guideline and Australian Cognitive Impairment Guideline), to develop interventions to address identified shortfalls in adherence to these standards of practice and finally to re-evaluate adherence postintervention. METHODS: A retrospective pre and postintervention audit using qualitative (interview) and quantitative (file review) mixed method research approach was used. Interventions targeted doctor hospital orientation sessions, distribution of hospital guidelines including a new pharmacological sedation guideline and finally ward-based brief education sessions. RESULTS: Themes identified postintervention included improved familiarity with C-ART terminology, better understanding of C-ART member roles and improved communication among medical teams. However, there was continued pressure to use pharmacological sedation, a lack of debriefing and poor patient handover. File review of patients postintervention showed improvement from 36.8% to 65.6% in recording a provisional diagnosis and differentials for a patient behaviour necessitating a C-ART call. Additionally, the use of psychotropics during C-ART calls was lowered by 3.3% but did not reach significance (p=0.62). CONCLUSION: Behavioural disturbances in the elderly present many challenges for health staff. Interactive orientation sessions for doctors and distribution of hospital guidelines were shown to improve compliance with Local C-ART Call and Australian Cognitive Impairment Guidelines. Patients who receive multiple C-ART calls require further exploration and consideration, as this subset of the patient population present unique challenges.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10040040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100400402023-03-27 Cognitive impairment and behavioural emergencies within the acute hospital setting Ilievski, Vasko Barrett, Tomiko Lawson, William Hoyland, Shane Tran, Kelvin BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: Patients with cognitive impairment exhibiting agitation and aggression are challenging to manage in the acute hospital setting. When a patient’s behaviours place themselves or others at risk of harm, a Clinical Aggression Response Team (C-ART) is dispatched. The aims of this project were to describe the characteristics of patients receiving a C-ART call and the experiences of C-ART staff members via semistructured interviews. Additionally, to audit local practice against two established standards of practice (Local C-ART Call Guideline and Australian Cognitive Impairment Guideline), to develop interventions to address identified shortfalls in adherence to these standards of practice and finally to re-evaluate adherence postintervention. METHODS: A retrospective pre and postintervention audit using qualitative (interview) and quantitative (file review) mixed method research approach was used. Interventions targeted doctor hospital orientation sessions, distribution of hospital guidelines including a new pharmacological sedation guideline and finally ward-based brief education sessions. RESULTS: Themes identified postintervention included improved familiarity with C-ART terminology, better understanding of C-ART member roles and improved communication among medical teams. However, there was continued pressure to use pharmacological sedation, a lack of debriefing and poor patient handover. File review of patients postintervention showed improvement from 36.8% to 65.6% in recording a provisional diagnosis and differentials for a patient behaviour necessitating a C-ART call. Additionally, the use of psychotropics during C-ART calls was lowered by 3.3% but did not reach significance (p=0.62). CONCLUSION: Behavioural disturbances in the elderly present many challenges for health staff. Interactive orientation sessions for doctors and distribution of hospital guidelines were shown to improve compliance with Local C-ART Call and Australian Cognitive Impairment Guidelines. Patients who receive multiple C-ART calls require further exploration and consideration, as this subset of the patient population present unique challenges. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10040040/ /pubmed/36958790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002034 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Ilievski, Vasko
Barrett, Tomiko
Lawson, William
Hoyland, Shane
Tran, Kelvin
Cognitive impairment and behavioural emergencies within the acute hospital setting
title Cognitive impairment and behavioural emergencies within the acute hospital setting
title_full Cognitive impairment and behavioural emergencies within the acute hospital setting
title_fullStr Cognitive impairment and behavioural emergencies within the acute hospital setting
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive impairment and behavioural emergencies within the acute hospital setting
title_short Cognitive impairment and behavioural emergencies within the acute hospital setting
title_sort cognitive impairment and behavioural emergencies within the acute hospital setting
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36958790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002034
work_keys_str_mv AT ilievskivasko cognitiveimpairmentandbehaviouralemergencieswithintheacutehospitalsetting
AT barretttomiko cognitiveimpairmentandbehaviouralemergencieswithintheacutehospitalsetting
AT lawsonwilliam cognitiveimpairmentandbehaviouralemergencieswithintheacutehospitalsetting
AT hoylandshane cognitiveimpairmentandbehaviouralemergencieswithintheacutehospitalsetting
AT trankelvin cognitiveimpairmentandbehaviouralemergencieswithintheacutehospitalsetting