Cargando…
Phase II study of nivolumab and salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab in treatment-naïve patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (HCRN GU16-260-Cohort B)
BACKGROUND: To determine the efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) and the efficacy of nivolumab/ipilimumab salvage therapy in patients with tumors unresponsive to initial nivolumab monotherapy. METHODS: Eligible...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36948504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-004780 |
_version_ | 1784912400483352576 |
---|---|
author | Atkins, Michael B Jegede, Opeyemi A Haas, Naomi B McDermott, David F Bilen, Mehmet A Stein, Mark Sosman, Jeffrey A Alter, Robert Plimack, Elizabeth R Ornstein, Moshe C Hurwitz, Michael Peace, David J Signoretti, Sabina Denize, Thomas Cimadamore, Alessia Wu, Catherine J Braun, David Einstein, David Catalano, Paul J Hammers, Hans |
author_facet | Atkins, Michael B Jegede, Opeyemi A Haas, Naomi B McDermott, David F Bilen, Mehmet A Stein, Mark Sosman, Jeffrey A Alter, Robert Plimack, Elizabeth R Ornstein, Moshe C Hurwitz, Michael Peace, David J Signoretti, Sabina Denize, Thomas Cimadamore, Alessia Wu, Catherine J Braun, David Einstein, David Catalano, Paul J Hammers, Hans |
author_sort | Atkins, Michael B |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To determine the efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) and the efficacy of nivolumab/ipilimumab salvage therapy in patients with tumors unresponsive to initial nivolumab monotherapy. METHODS: Eligible patients with treatment-naïve nccRCC received nivolumab until progressive disease (PD), toxicity, or completion of 96 weeks of treatment (Part A). Patients with PD prior to, or stable disease (SD) at 48 weeks (prolonged SD) were potentially eligible to receive salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab (Part B). Patients were required to submit tissue from a metastatic lesion obtained within 12 months prior to study entry and prior to Part B for correlative studies. RESULTS: 35 patients with nccRCC were enrolled: 19 (54%) had papillary, 6 (17%) had chromophobe and 10 (29%) had unclassified histology. At median follow-up of 22.9 months, RECIST-defined objective response rate (ORR) was 5 of 35 (14.3% 95% CI 4.8% to 30.3%) (complete response (CR) 2 (5.7%) and partial response (PR) 3 (8.6%)). ORR by histology was: papillary—1/19 (5%); chromophobe—1/6 (17%); and unclassified—3/10 (30%). Nine patients (26%) had tumors with sarcomatoid features with 3 (33%) (2 unclassified and 1 papillary) responding. ORR was 0/18, 3/11 (27%) and 2/6 (33%) for patients with tumor progammed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of <5%, ≥5% or not measured, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 4.0 (2.7–4.3) months. Two of five responders have progressed. Thirty-two patients had PD or prolonged SD and therefore, were potentially eligible for salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab (Part B), but 15 patients did not enroll due to grade 2–3 toxicity (6) on nivolumab, symptomatic disease progression (5), or other reasons including no biopsy tissue (4). In the 17 Part B patients, there was one PR (6%) (unclassified/non-sarcomatoid). Grade >3 treatment-related adverse events were seen in 7/35 (20%) on nivolumab and 7/17 (41%) on salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab with one patient experiencing sudden death. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab monotherapy has limited activity in treatment-naïve nccRCC with most responses (4 of 5) seen in patients with sarcomatoid and/or unclassified tumors. Toxicity is consistent with prior nivolumab studies. Salvage treatment with nivolumab/ipilimumab was provided in half of these patients with minimal activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03117309. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10040058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100400582023-03-27 Phase II study of nivolumab and salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab in treatment-naïve patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (HCRN GU16-260-Cohort B) Atkins, Michael B Jegede, Opeyemi A Haas, Naomi B McDermott, David F Bilen, Mehmet A Stein, Mark Sosman, Jeffrey A Alter, Robert Plimack, Elizabeth R Ornstein, Moshe C Hurwitz, Michael Peace, David J Signoretti, Sabina Denize, Thomas Cimadamore, Alessia Wu, Catherine J Braun, David Einstein, David Catalano, Paul J Hammers, Hans J Immunother Cancer Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy BACKGROUND: To determine the efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) and the efficacy of nivolumab/ipilimumab salvage therapy in patients with tumors unresponsive to initial nivolumab monotherapy. METHODS: Eligible patients with treatment-naïve nccRCC received nivolumab until progressive disease (PD), toxicity, or completion of 96 weeks of treatment (Part A). Patients with PD prior to, or stable disease (SD) at 48 weeks (prolonged SD) were potentially eligible to receive salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab (Part B). Patients were required to submit tissue from a metastatic lesion obtained within 12 months prior to study entry and prior to Part B for correlative studies. RESULTS: 35 patients with nccRCC were enrolled: 19 (54%) had papillary, 6 (17%) had chromophobe and 10 (29%) had unclassified histology. At median follow-up of 22.9 months, RECIST-defined objective response rate (ORR) was 5 of 35 (14.3% 95% CI 4.8% to 30.3%) (complete response (CR) 2 (5.7%) and partial response (PR) 3 (8.6%)). ORR by histology was: papillary—1/19 (5%); chromophobe—1/6 (17%); and unclassified—3/10 (30%). Nine patients (26%) had tumors with sarcomatoid features with 3 (33%) (2 unclassified and 1 papillary) responding. ORR was 0/18, 3/11 (27%) and 2/6 (33%) for patients with tumor progammed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of <5%, ≥5% or not measured, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 4.0 (2.7–4.3) months. Two of five responders have progressed. Thirty-two patients had PD or prolonged SD and therefore, were potentially eligible for salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab (Part B), but 15 patients did not enroll due to grade 2–3 toxicity (6) on nivolumab, symptomatic disease progression (5), or other reasons including no biopsy tissue (4). In the 17 Part B patients, there was one PR (6%) (unclassified/non-sarcomatoid). Grade >3 treatment-related adverse events were seen in 7/35 (20%) on nivolumab and 7/17 (41%) on salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab with one patient experiencing sudden death. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab monotherapy has limited activity in treatment-naïve nccRCC with most responses (4 of 5) seen in patients with sarcomatoid and/or unclassified tumors. Toxicity is consistent with prior nivolumab studies. Salvage treatment with nivolumab/ipilimumab was provided in half of these patients with minimal activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03117309. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10040058/ /pubmed/36948504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-004780 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy Atkins, Michael B Jegede, Opeyemi A Haas, Naomi B McDermott, David F Bilen, Mehmet A Stein, Mark Sosman, Jeffrey A Alter, Robert Plimack, Elizabeth R Ornstein, Moshe C Hurwitz, Michael Peace, David J Signoretti, Sabina Denize, Thomas Cimadamore, Alessia Wu, Catherine J Braun, David Einstein, David Catalano, Paul J Hammers, Hans Phase II study of nivolumab and salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab in treatment-naïve patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (HCRN GU16-260-Cohort B) |
title | Phase II study of nivolumab and salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab in treatment-naïve patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (HCRN GU16-260-Cohort B) |
title_full | Phase II study of nivolumab and salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab in treatment-naïve patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (HCRN GU16-260-Cohort B) |
title_fullStr | Phase II study of nivolumab and salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab in treatment-naïve patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (HCRN GU16-260-Cohort B) |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase II study of nivolumab and salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab in treatment-naïve patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (HCRN GU16-260-Cohort B) |
title_short | Phase II study of nivolumab and salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab in treatment-naïve patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (HCRN GU16-260-Cohort B) |
title_sort | phase ii study of nivolumab and salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab in treatment-naïve patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (hcrn gu16-260-cohort b) |
topic | Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36948504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-004780 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atkinsmichaelb phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT jegedeopeyemia phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT haasnaomib phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT mcdermottdavidf phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT bilenmehmeta phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT steinmark phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT sosmanjeffreya phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT alterrobert phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT plimackelizabethr phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT ornsteinmoshec phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT hurwitzmichael phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT peacedavidj phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT signorettisabina phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT denizethomas phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT cimadamorealessia phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT wucatherinej phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT braundavid phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT einsteindavid phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT catalanopaulj phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb AT hammershans phaseiistudyofnivolumabandsalvagenivolumabipilimumabintreatmentnaivepatientswithadvancednonclearcellrenalcellcarcinomahcrngu16260cohortb |