Cargando…

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Culture-Positive and Culture-Negative Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients: A Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis has been conducted to compare the clinical outcomes between culture-positive and culture-negative sepsis or septic patients. The present meta-analysis is reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic database...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Afzal, Muhammad S, Nandan Chennuri, Raj, Naveed, Husnain, Raveena Bai, Bansari, Hanif, Rutaba, Shahzad, Zoha, Umer, Muhammed, Saleem, Faraz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36987463
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35416
_version_ 1784912433571168256
author Afzal, Muhammad S
Nandan Chennuri, Raj
Naveed, Husnain
Raveena Bai, Bansari
Hanif, Rutaba
Shahzad, Zoha
Umer, Muhammed
Saleem, Faraz
author_facet Afzal, Muhammad S
Nandan Chennuri, Raj
Naveed, Husnain
Raveena Bai, Bansari
Hanif, Rutaba
Shahzad, Zoha
Umer, Muhammed
Saleem, Faraz
author_sort Afzal, Muhammad S
collection PubMed
description This meta-analysis has been conducted to compare the clinical outcomes between culture-positive and culture-negative sepsis or septic patients. The present meta-analysis is reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic databases, including PubMed and EMBASE, were searched by two authors independently from the inception to January 25, 2023, using the following key terms: “culture positive,” “culture negative,” “sepsis,” and “septic shock.” The primary outcome assessed in the present meta-analysis was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included the need for mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, length of ICU stay in days, and length of hospital stay in days. Total 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis involving 23,973 patients. No statistically significant difference was found between culture-positive and culture-negative patients in terms of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR]: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.95-1.24, p-value: 0.23), the need for mechanical ventilation (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.93-1.05, p-value: 0.79), renal replacement therapy requirements (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.95-1.31, p-value: 0.19), and ICU length of stay (mean difference [MD]: 1.70 days, 95% CI: -1.10, 4.49, p-value: 0.23). However, The mean hospital length of stay in days was significantly longer in patients in a culture-positive group compared to the culture-negative group (MD: 3.04, 95% CI: 2.25-3.82, p-value<0.001). In conclusion, the present meta-analysis of 10 studies, including 23,973 patients, found no significant differences in all-cause mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, need for renal replacement therapy, and length of ICU stay between culture-positive and culture-negative sepsis or septic patients. However, a significant difference was found in hospital length of stay, with culture-positive patients having a longer stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10040220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100402202023-03-27 Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Culture-Positive and Culture-Negative Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients: A Meta-Analysis Afzal, Muhammad S Nandan Chennuri, Raj Naveed, Husnain Raveena Bai, Bansari Hanif, Rutaba Shahzad, Zoha Umer, Muhammed Saleem, Faraz Cureus Family/General Practice This meta-analysis has been conducted to compare the clinical outcomes between culture-positive and culture-negative sepsis or septic patients. The present meta-analysis is reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic databases, including PubMed and EMBASE, were searched by two authors independently from the inception to January 25, 2023, using the following key terms: “culture positive,” “culture negative,” “sepsis,” and “septic shock.” The primary outcome assessed in the present meta-analysis was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included the need for mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, length of ICU stay in days, and length of hospital stay in days. Total 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis involving 23,973 patients. No statistically significant difference was found between culture-positive and culture-negative patients in terms of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR]: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.95-1.24, p-value: 0.23), the need for mechanical ventilation (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.93-1.05, p-value: 0.79), renal replacement therapy requirements (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.95-1.31, p-value: 0.19), and ICU length of stay (mean difference [MD]: 1.70 days, 95% CI: -1.10, 4.49, p-value: 0.23). However, The mean hospital length of stay in days was significantly longer in patients in a culture-positive group compared to the culture-negative group (MD: 3.04, 95% CI: 2.25-3.82, p-value<0.001). In conclusion, the present meta-analysis of 10 studies, including 23,973 patients, found no significant differences in all-cause mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, need for renal replacement therapy, and length of ICU stay between culture-positive and culture-negative sepsis or septic patients. However, a significant difference was found in hospital length of stay, with culture-positive patients having a longer stay. Cureus 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10040220/ /pubmed/36987463 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35416 Text en Copyright © 2023, Afzal et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Family/General Practice
Afzal, Muhammad S
Nandan Chennuri, Raj
Naveed, Husnain
Raveena Bai, Bansari
Hanif, Rutaba
Shahzad, Zoha
Umer, Muhammed
Saleem, Faraz
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Culture-Positive and Culture-Negative Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Culture-Positive and Culture-Negative Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Culture-Positive and Culture-Negative Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Culture-Positive and Culture-Negative Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Culture-Positive and Culture-Negative Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Culture-Positive and Culture-Negative Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison of clinical outcomes between culture-positive and culture-negative sepsis and septic shock patients: a meta-analysis
topic Family/General Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36987463
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35416
work_keys_str_mv AT afzalmuhammads comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenculturepositiveandculturenegativesepsisandsepticshockpatientsametaanalysis
AT nandanchennuriraj comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenculturepositiveandculturenegativesepsisandsepticshockpatientsametaanalysis
AT naveedhusnain comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenculturepositiveandculturenegativesepsisandsepticshockpatientsametaanalysis
AT raveenabaibansari comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenculturepositiveandculturenegativesepsisandsepticshockpatientsametaanalysis
AT hanifrutaba comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenculturepositiveandculturenegativesepsisandsepticshockpatientsametaanalysis
AT shahzadzoha comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenculturepositiveandculturenegativesepsisandsepticshockpatientsametaanalysis
AT umermuhammed comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenculturepositiveandculturenegativesepsisandsepticshockpatientsametaanalysis
AT saleemfaraz comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenculturepositiveandculturenegativesepsisandsepticshockpatientsametaanalysis