Cargando…

Systematic rotation versus continuous application of ‘nasal prongs’ or ‘nasal mask’ in preterm infants on nCPAP: a randomized controlled trial

To compare whether alternate rotation of nasal mask with nasal prongs every 8 h as compared to continuous use of either interface alone decreases the incidence of nasal injury in preterm infants receiving nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP). This was an open-label, three-arm, stratifie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gautam, Gaurav, Gupta, Neeraj, Sasidharan, Rohit, Thanigainathan, Sivam, Yadav, Bharti, Singh, Kuldeep, Singh, Arun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36967420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04933-1
_version_ 1784912451004792832
author Gautam, Gaurav
Gupta, Neeraj
Sasidharan, Rohit
Thanigainathan, Sivam
Yadav, Bharti
Singh, Kuldeep
Singh, Arun
author_facet Gautam, Gaurav
Gupta, Neeraj
Sasidharan, Rohit
Thanigainathan, Sivam
Yadav, Bharti
Singh, Kuldeep
Singh, Arun
author_sort Gautam, Gaurav
collection PubMed
description To compare whether alternate rotation of nasal mask with nasal prongs every 8 h as compared to continuous use of either interface alone decreases the incidence of nasal injury in preterm infants receiving nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP). This was an open-label, three-arm, stratified randomized controlled trial where infants < 35 weeks receiving nCPAP were randomized into three groups using two different nasal interfaces (continuous prongs group, continuous mask group, and rotation group). All infants were assessed for nasal injury six hours post-removal of nCPAP using grading suggested by Fischer et al. The nursing care was uniform across all three groups. Intention-to-treat analysis was done. Fifty-seven infants were enrolled, with nineteen in each group. The incidence of nasal injury was 42.1% vs. 47.4% vs. 68.4% in the rotation group, continuous mask, and continuous prongs groups, respectively (P = 0.228). On adjusted analysis (gestational age, birth weight, and duration of nCPAP therapy), the incidence of nasal injury was significantly less in the rotation group as compared to continuous prongs group (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR], 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.10 [0.01–0.69], P = 0.02) and a trend towards lesser nasal injury as compared to continuous mask group (AOR, 95% CI; 0.15 [0.02–1.08], P = 0.06). However, there was no significant difference in incidence of nasal injuries between continuous prongs versus continuous mask group (P = 0.60). The need for surfactant, nCPAP failure rate, duration of nCPAP, and common neonatal co-morbidities were similar across all three groups.    Conclusion: Systematic rotation of nasal mask with nasal prongs significantly reduced nasal injury among preterm infants on nCPAP as compared to continuous use of nasal prongs alone without affecting nCPAP failure rate.    Trial registration: CTRI/2019/01/017320, registered on 31/01/2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00431-023-04933-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10040306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100403062023-03-27 Systematic rotation versus continuous application of ‘nasal prongs’ or ‘nasal mask’ in preterm infants on nCPAP: a randomized controlled trial Gautam, Gaurav Gupta, Neeraj Sasidharan, Rohit Thanigainathan, Sivam Yadav, Bharti Singh, Kuldeep Singh, Arun Eur J Pediatr Research To compare whether alternate rotation of nasal mask with nasal prongs every 8 h as compared to continuous use of either interface alone decreases the incidence of nasal injury in preterm infants receiving nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP). This was an open-label, three-arm, stratified randomized controlled trial where infants < 35 weeks receiving nCPAP were randomized into three groups using two different nasal interfaces (continuous prongs group, continuous mask group, and rotation group). All infants were assessed for nasal injury six hours post-removal of nCPAP using grading suggested by Fischer et al. The nursing care was uniform across all three groups. Intention-to-treat analysis was done. Fifty-seven infants were enrolled, with nineteen in each group. The incidence of nasal injury was 42.1% vs. 47.4% vs. 68.4% in the rotation group, continuous mask, and continuous prongs groups, respectively (P = 0.228). On adjusted analysis (gestational age, birth weight, and duration of nCPAP therapy), the incidence of nasal injury was significantly less in the rotation group as compared to continuous prongs group (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR], 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.10 [0.01–0.69], P = 0.02) and a trend towards lesser nasal injury as compared to continuous mask group (AOR, 95% CI; 0.15 [0.02–1.08], P = 0.06). However, there was no significant difference in incidence of nasal injuries between continuous prongs versus continuous mask group (P = 0.60). The need for surfactant, nCPAP failure rate, duration of nCPAP, and common neonatal co-morbidities were similar across all three groups.    Conclusion: Systematic rotation of nasal mask with nasal prongs significantly reduced nasal injury among preterm infants on nCPAP as compared to continuous use of nasal prongs alone without affecting nCPAP failure rate.    Trial registration: CTRI/2019/01/017320, registered on 31/01/2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00431-023-04933-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10040306/ /pubmed/36967420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04933-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Research
Gautam, Gaurav
Gupta, Neeraj
Sasidharan, Rohit
Thanigainathan, Sivam
Yadav, Bharti
Singh, Kuldeep
Singh, Arun
Systematic rotation versus continuous application of ‘nasal prongs’ or ‘nasal mask’ in preterm infants on nCPAP: a randomized controlled trial
title Systematic rotation versus continuous application of ‘nasal prongs’ or ‘nasal mask’ in preterm infants on nCPAP: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Systematic rotation versus continuous application of ‘nasal prongs’ or ‘nasal mask’ in preterm infants on nCPAP: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Systematic rotation versus continuous application of ‘nasal prongs’ or ‘nasal mask’ in preterm infants on nCPAP: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Systematic rotation versus continuous application of ‘nasal prongs’ or ‘nasal mask’ in preterm infants on nCPAP: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Systematic rotation versus continuous application of ‘nasal prongs’ or ‘nasal mask’ in preterm infants on nCPAP: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort systematic rotation versus continuous application of ‘nasal prongs’ or ‘nasal mask’ in preterm infants on ncpap: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36967420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04933-1
work_keys_str_mv AT gautamgaurav systematicrotationversuscontinuousapplicationofnasalprongsornasalmaskinpreterminfantsonncpaparandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guptaneeraj systematicrotationversuscontinuousapplicationofnasalprongsornasalmaskinpreterminfantsonncpaparandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sasidharanrohit systematicrotationversuscontinuousapplicationofnasalprongsornasalmaskinpreterminfantsonncpaparandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thanigainathansivam systematicrotationversuscontinuousapplicationofnasalprongsornasalmaskinpreterminfantsonncpaparandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yadavbharti systematicrotationversuscontinuousapplicationofnasalprongsornasalmaskinpreterminfantsonncpaparandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT singhkuldeep systematicrotationversuscontinuousapplicationofnasalprongsornasalmaskinpreterminfantsonncpaparandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT singharun systematicrotationversuscontinuousapplicationofnasalprongsornasalmaskinpreterminfantsonncpaparandomizedcontrolledtrial