Cargando…
Effectiveness of non-invasive chromosomal screening for normal karyotype and chromosomal rearrangements
Purpose: To study the accuracy of non-invasive chromosomal screening (NICS) results, in normal chromosomes and chromosomal rearrangement groups and to investigate whether using trophoblast cell biopsy along with NICS, to choose embryos for transfer can improve the clinical outcomes of assisted pregn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36992701 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1036467 |
_version_ | 1784912511846318080 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Bo-lan Wang, Yong Sixi-Wen, Zhou, Liang Zhang, Chun-hui Wu, Ze-Xuan Qiao, Jie Sun, Qing-yuan Yao, Ya-xin Wang, Jing Yi, Zi-Yun Qian, Wei-Ping |
author_facet | Sun, Bo-lan Wang, Yong Sixi-Wen, Zhou, Liang Zhang, Chun-hui Wu, Ze-Xuan Qiao, Jie Sun, Qing-yuan Yao, Ya-xin Wang, Jing Yi, Zi-Yun Qian, Wei-Ping |
author_sort | Sun, Bo-lan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To study the accuracy of non-invasive chromosomal screening (NICS) results, in normal chromosomes and chromosomal rearrangement groups and to investigate whether using trophoblast cell biopsy along with NICS, to choose embryos for transfer can improve the clinical outcomes of assisted pregnancy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 101 couples who underwent preimplantation genetic testing at our center from January 2019 to June 2021 and collected 492 blastocysts for trophocyte (TE) biopsy. D3-5 blastocyst culture fluid and blastocyst cavity fluid were collected for the NICS. Amongst them, 278 blastocysts (58 couples) and 214 blastocysts (43 couples) were included in the normal chromosomes and chromosomal rearrangement groups, respectively. Couples undergoing embryo transfer were divided into group A, in which both the NICS and TE biopsy results were euploid (52 embryos), and group B, in which the TE biopsy results were euploid and the NICS results were aneuploid (33 embryos). Results: In the normal karyotype group, concordance for embryo ploidy was 78.1%, sensitivity was 94.9%, specificity was 51.4%, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 75.7%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 86.4%. In the chromosomal rearrangement group, concordance for embryo ploidy was 73.1%, sensitivity was 93.3%, specificity was 53.3%, the PPV was 66.3%, and the NPV was 89%. In euploid TE/euploid NICS group, 52 embryos were transferred; the clinical pregnancy rate was 71.2%, miscarriage rate was 5.4%, and ongoing pregnancy rate was 67.3%. In euploid TE/aneuploid NICS group, 33 embryos were transferred; the clinic pregnancy rate was 54.5%, miscarriage rate was 5.6%, and ongoingpregnancy rate was 51.5%. The clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates were higher in the TE and NICS euploid group. Conclusion: NICS was similarly effective in assessing both normal and abnormal populations. Identification of euploidy and aneuploidy alone may lead to the wastage of embryos due to high false positives. More suitable reporting methods for NICS and countermeasures for a high number of false positives in NICS are needed. In summary, our results suggest that combining biopsy and NICS results could improve the outcomes of assisted pregnancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10040604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100406042023-03-28 Effectiveness of non-invasive chromosomal screening for normal karyotype and chromosomal rearrangements Sun, Bo-lan Wang, Yong Sixi-Wen, Zhou, Liang Zhang, Chun-hui Wu, Ze-Xuan Qiao, Jie Sun, Qing-yuan Yao, Ya-xin Wang, Jing Yi, Zi-Yun Qian, Wei-Ping Front Genet Genetics Purpose: To study the accuracy of non-invasive chromosomal screening (NICS) results, in normal chromosomes and chromosomal rearrangement groups and to investigate whether using trophoblast cell biopsy along with NICS, to choose embryos for transfer can improve the clinical outcomes of assisted pregnancy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 101 couples who underwent preimplantation genetic testing at our center from January 2019 to June 2021 and collected 492 blastocysts for trophocyte (TE) biopsy. D3-5 blastocyst culture fluid and blastocyst cavity fluid were collected for the NICS. Amongst them, 278 blastocysts (58 couples) and 214 blastocysts (43 couples) were included in the normal chromosomes and chromosomal rearrangement groups, respectively. Couples undergoing embryo transfer were divided into group A, in which both the NICS and TE biopsy results were euploid (52 embryos), and group B, in which the TE biopsy results were euploid and the NICS results were aneuploid (33 embryos). Results: In the normal karyotype group, concordance for embryo ploidy was 78.1%, sensitivity was 94.9%, specificity was 51.4%, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 75.7%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 86.4%. In the chromosomal rearrangement group, concordance for embryo ploidy was 73.1%, sensitivity was 93.3%, specificity was 53.3%, the PPV was 66.3%, and the NPV was 89%. In euploid TE/euploid NICS group, 52 embryos were transferred; the clinical pregnancy rate was 71.2%, miscarriage rate was 5.4%, and ongoing pregnancy rate was 67.3%. In euploid TE/aneuploid NICS group, 33 embryos were transferred; the clinic pregnancy rate was 54.5%, miscarriage rate was 5.6%, and ongoingpregnancy rate was 51.5%. The clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates were higher in the TE and NICS euploid group. Conclusion: NICS was similarly effective in assessing both normal and abnormal populations. Identification of euploidy and aneuploidy alone may lead to the wastage of embryos due to high false positives. More suitable reporting methods for NICS and countermeasures for a high number of false positives in NICS are needed. In summary, our results suggest that combining biopsy and NICS results could improve the outcomes of assisted pregnancy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10040604/ /pubmed/36992701 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1036467 Text en Copyright © 2023 Sun, Wang, Sixi-Wen, Zhou, Zhang, Wu, Qiao, Sun, Yao, Wang, Yi and Qian. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Sun, Bo-lan Wang, Yong Sixi-Wen, Zhou, Liang Zhang, Chun-hui Wu, Ze-Xuan Qiao, Jie Sun, Qing-yuan Yao, Ya-xin Wang, Jing Yi, Zi-Yun Qian, Wei-Ping Effectiveness of non-invasive chromosomal screening for normal karyotype and chromosomal rearrangements |
title | Effectiveness of non-invasive chromosomal screening for normal karyotype and chromosomal rearrangements |
title_full | Effectiveness of non-invasive chromosomal screening for normal karyotype and chromosomal rearrangements |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of non-invasive chromosomal screening for normal karyotype and chromosomal rearrangements |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of non-invasive chromosomal screening for normal karyotype and chromosomal rearrangements |
title_short | Effectiveness of non-invasive chromosomal screening for normal karyotype and chromosomal rearrangements |
title_sort | effectiveness of non-invasive chromosomal screening for normal karyotype and chromosomal rearrangements |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36992701 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1036467 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunbolan effectivenessofnoninvasivechromosomalscreeningfornormalkaryotypeandchromosomalrearrangements AT wangyong effectivenessofnoninvasivechromosomalscreeningfornormalkaryotypeandchromosomalrearrangements AT sixiwen effectivenessofnoninvasivechromosomalscreeningfornormalkaryotypeandchromosomalrearrangements AT zhouliang effectivenessofnoninvasivechromosomalscreeningfornormalkaryotypeandchromosomalrearrangements AT zhangchunhui effectivenessofnoninvasivechromosomalscreeningfornormalkaryotypeandchromosomalrearrangements AT wuzexuan effectivenessofnoninvasivechromosomalscreeningfornormalkaryotypeandchromosomalrearrangements AT qiaojie effectivenessofnoninvasivechromosomalscreeningfornormalkaryotypeandchromosomalrearrangements AT sunqingyuan effectivenessofnoninvasivechromosomalscreeningfornormalkaryotypeandchromosomalrearrangements AT yaoyaxin effectivenessofnoninvasivechromosomalscreeningfornormalkaryotypeandchromosomalrearrangements AT wangjing effectivenessofnoninvasivechromosomalscreeningfornormalkaryotypeandchromosomalrearrangements AT yiziyun effectivenessofnoninvasivechromosomalscreeningfornormalkaryotypeandchromosomalrearrangements AT qianweiping effectivenessofnoninvasivechromosomalscreeningfornormalkaryotypeandchromosomalrearrangements |