Cargando…

Feasibility of implementing a surgical patient safety checklist: prospective cross-sectional evaluation

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization’s Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030 call for attention to patient and family involvement to reduce preventable patient harm. Existing evidence indicates that patients’ involvement in their own safety has positive effects on reducing hospitalisation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Kristin, Søfteland, Eirik, Moi, Asgjerd Litleré, Harthug, Stig, Ravnøy, Mette, Storesund, Anette, Jurmy, Elaheh, Skeie, Eli, Wæhle, Hilde Valen, Sevdalis, Nick, Haugen, Arvid Steinar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36973815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01277-3
_version_ 1784912589202915328
author Harris, Kristin
Søfteland, Eirik
Moi, Asgjerd Litleré
Harthug, Stig
Ravnøy, Mette
Storesund, Anette
Jurmy, Elaheh
Skeie, Eli
Wæhle, Hilde Valen
Sevdalis, Nick
Haugen, Arvid Steinar
author_facet Harris, Kristin
Søfteland, Eirik
Moi, Asgjerd Litleré
Harthug, Stig
Ravnøy, Mette
Storesund, Anette
Jurmy, Elaheh
Skeie, Eli
Wæhle, Hilde Valen
Sevdalis, Nick
Haugen, Arvid Steinar
author_sort Harris, Kristin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization’s Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030 call for attention to patient and family involvement to reduce preventable patient harm. Existing evidence indicates that patients’ involvement in their own safety has positive effects on reducing hospitalisation time and readmissions. One intervention reported in the literature is the use of checklists designed for patients’ completion. Studies on such checklists are small scale, but they are linked to reduction in length of hospital stay and readmissions. We have previously developed and validated a two-part surgical patient safety checklist (PASC). This study aims to investigate the feasibility of the PASC usage and implementation prior to its use in a large-scale clinical trial. METHODS: This is a prospective cross-sectional feasibility study, set up as part of the design of a larger stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial (SW-CRCT). Descriptive statistics were used to investigate patient demographics, reasons for not completing the PASC and percentage of PASC item usage. Qualitative patient interviews were used to identify barriers and drivers for implementation. Interview was analysed through content analysis. RESULTS: Out of 428 recruited patients, 50.2% (215/428) used both parts of PASC. A total of 24.1% (103/428) of the patients did not use it at all due to surgical or COVID-19-related cancellations. A total of 19.9% (85/428) did not consent to participate, 5.1% (22/428) lost the checklist and 0.7% (3/428) of the patients died during the study. A total of 86.5% (186/215) patients used ≥ 80% of the checklist items. Barriers and drivers for PASC implementation were grouped into the following categories: Time frame for completing the checklist, patient safety checklist design, impetus to communicate with healthcare professionals and support throughout the surgical pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Elective surgical patients were willing and able to use PASC. The study further revealed a set of barriers and drivers to the implementation. A large-scale definitive clinical-implementation hybrid trial is being launched to ascertain the clinical effectiveness and scalability of PASC in improving surgical patient safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03105713. Registered 10.04.2017 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-023-01277-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10040905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100409052023-03-27 Feasibility of implementing a surgical patient safety checklist: prospective cross-sectional evaluation Harris, Kristin Søfteland, Eirik Moi, Asgjerd Litleré Harthug, Stig Ravnøy, Mette Storesund, Anette Jurmy, Elaheh Skeie, Eli Wæhle, Hilde Valen Sevdalis, Nick Haugen, Arvid Steinar Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization’s Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030 call for attention to patient and family involvement to reduce preventable patient harm. Existing evidence indicates that patients’ involvement in their own safety has positive effects on reducing hospitalisation time and readmissions. One intervention reported in the literature is the use of checklists designed for patients’ completion. Studies on such checklists are small scale, but they are linked to reduction in length of hospital stay and readmissions. We have previously developed and validated a two-part surgical patient safety checklist (PASC). This study aims to investigate the feasibility of the PASC usage and implementation prior to its use in a large-scale clinical trial. METHODS: This is a prospective cross-sectional feasibility study, set up as part of the design of a larger stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial (SW-CRCT). Descriptive statistics were used to investigate patient demographics, reasons for not completing the PASC and percentage of PASC item usage. Qualitative patient interviews were used to identify barriers and drivers for implementation. Interview was analysed through content analysis. RESULTS: Out of 428 recruited patients, 50.2% (215/428) used both parts of PASC. A total of 24.1% (103/428) of the patients did not use it at all due to surgical or COVID-19-related cancellations. A total of 19.9% (85/428) did not consent to participate, 5.1% (22/428) lost the checklist and 0.7% (3/428) of the patients died during the study. A total of 86.5% (186/215) patients used ≥ 80% of the checklist items. Barriers and drivers for PASC implementation were grouped into the following categories: Time frame for completing the checklist, patient safety checklist design, impetus to communicate with healthcare professionals and support throughout the surgical pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Elective surgical patients were willing and able to use PASC. The study further revealed a set of barriers and drivers to the implementation. A large-scale definitive clinical-implementation hybrid trial is being launched to ascertain the clinical effectiveness and scalability of PASC in improving surgical patient safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03105713. Registered 10.04.2017 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-023-01277-3. BioMed Central 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10040905/ /pubmed/36973815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01277-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Harris, Kristin
Søfteland, Eirik
Moi, Asgjerd Litleré
Harthug, Stig
Ravnøy, Mette
Storesund, Anette
Jurmy, Elaheh
Skeie, Eli
Wæhle, Hilde Valen
Sevdalis, Nick
Haugen, Arvid Steinar
Feasibility of implementing a surgical patient safety checklist: prospective cross-sectional evaluation
title Feasibility of implementing a surgical patient safety checklist: prospective cross-sectional evaluation
title_full Feasibility of implementing a surgical patient safety checklist: prospective cross-sectional evaluation
title_fullStr Feasibility of implementing a surgical patient safety checklist: prospective cross-sectional evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of implementing a surgical patient safety checklist: prospective cross-sectional evaluation
title_short Feasibility of implementing a surgical patient safety checklist: prospective cross-sectional evaluation
title_sort feasibility of implementing a surgical patient safety checklist: prospective cross-sectional evaluation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36973815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01277-3
work_keys_str_mv AT harriskristin feasibilityofimplementingasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistprospectivecrosssectionalevaluation
AT søftelandeirik feasibilityofimplementingasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistprospectivecrosssectionalevaluation
AT moiasgjerdlitlere feasibilityofimplementingasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistprospectivecrosssectionalevaluation
AT harthugstig feasibilityofimplementingasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistprospectivecrosssectionalevaluation
AT ravnøymette feasibilityofimplementingasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistprospectivecrosssectionalevaluation
AT storesundanette feasibilityofimplementingasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistprospectivecrosssectionalevaluation
AT jurmyelaheh feasibilityofimplementingasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistprospectivecrosssectionalevaluation
AT skeieeli feasibilityofimplementingasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistprospectivecrosssectionalevaluation
AT wæhlehildevalen feasibilityofimplementingasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistprospectivecrosssectionalevaluation
AT sevdalisnick feasibilityofimplementingasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistprospectivecrosssectionalevaluation
AT haugenarvidsteinar feasibilityofimplementingasurgicalpatientsafetychecklistprospectivecrosssectionalevaluation