Cargando…

Comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: A narrative review

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Evaluating the effect of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength (FS) and elasticity modules (EM) related to fiber posts is very important. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatment methods on FS and EM of quartz and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meimandinezhad, Marzieh, Bidhendi, Hadi Mohammadi, Zadeh, Elnaz Tavazo, Anzabi, Reza Mahmoudi, Asadi, Haniyeh, Fathi, Amirhossein, Gholami, Mahnaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36994049
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_239_21
_version_ 1784912614300581888
author Meimandinezhad, Marzieh
Bidhendi, Hadi Mohammadi
Zadeh, Elnaz Tavazo
Anzabi, Reza Mahmoudi
Asadi, Haniyeh
Fathi, Amirhossein
Gholami, Mahnaz
author_facet Meimandinezhad, Marzieh
Bidhendi, Hadi Mohammadi
Zadeh, Elnaz Tavazo
Anzabi, Reza Mahmoudi
Asadi, Haniyeh
Fathi, Amirhossein
Gholami, Mahnaz
author_sort Meimandinezhad, Marzieh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Evaluating the effect of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength (FS) and elasticity modules (EM) related to fiber posts is very important. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatment methods on FS and EM of quartz and glass fiber-based posts in the form of a narrative review study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To conduct this study, all studies related to the subject under discussion during the years 2022–2000 by systematic search in internationally available databases, including Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar, were checked out. Finally, completely relevant studies were selected to investigate the main objective. RESULTS: The results showed that before surface preparation, FS and elasticity coefficient (EC) of quartz fiber-based posts were higher than glass fiber. According to the results of some previous studies, surface preparation of glass and quartz fiber posts by laser and 10% hydrogen peroxide has no effect on their FS and elasticity. Findings of some other studies showed that the laser method than air abrasion can be a more suitable method for preparing the surface of fiber posts before the bonding process. In some other studies, it was reported that the Airborne-particle abrasion (Al(2)O(3)) method produced a higher amount of FS than the laser. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of previous similar studies, it can be concluded that the results of previous studies are very contradictory, and therefore, it is not possible to provide a completely superior surface treatment method to increase flexural strength. The amount of flexural strength depends mainly on the intrinsic properties of the fiber post.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10041018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100410182023-03-28 Comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: A narrative review Meimandinezhad, Marzieh Bidhendi, Hadi Mohammadi Zadeh, Elnaz Tavazo Anzabi, Reza Mahmoudi Asadi, Haniyeh Fathi, Amirhossein Gholami, Mahnaz J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: Evaluating the effect of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength (FS) and elasticity modules (EM) related to fiber posts is very important. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatment methods on FS and EM of quartz and glass fiber-based posts in the form of a narrative review study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To conduct this study, all studies related to the subject under discussion during the years 2022–2000 by systematic search in internationally available databases, including Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar, were checked out. Finally, completely relevant studies were selected to investigate the main objective. RESULTS: The results showed that before surface preparation, FS and elasticity coefficient (EC) of quartz fiber-based posts were higher than glass fiber. According to the results of some previous studies, surface preparation of glass and quartz fiber posts by laser and 10% hydrogen peroxide has no effect on their FS and elasticity. Findings of some other studies showed that the laser method than air abrasion can be a more suitable method for preparing the surface of fiber posts before the bonding process. In some other studies, it was reported that the Airborne-particle abrasion (Al(2)O(3)) method produced a higher amount of FS than the laser. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of previous similar studies, it can be concluded that the results of previous studies are very contradictory, and therefore, it is not possible to provide a completely superior surface treatment method to increase flexural strength. The amount of flexural strength depends mainly on the intrinsic properties of the fiber post. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-12 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10041018/ /pubmed/36994049 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_239_21 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Meimandinezhad, Marzieh
Bidhendi, Hadi Mohammadi
Zadeh, Elnaz Tavazo
Anzabi, Reza Mahmoudi
Asadi, Haniyeh
Fathi, Amirhossein
Gholami, Mahnaz
Comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: A narrative review
title Comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: A narrative review
title_full Comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: A narrative review
title_fullStr Comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: A narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: A narrative review
title_short Comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: A narrative review
title_sort comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: a narrative review
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36994049
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_239_21
work_keys_str_mv AT meimandinezhadmarzieh comparisonofdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonflexuralstrengthandelasticitymodulesofquartzandglassfiberbasedpostsanarrativereview
AT bidhendihadimohammadi comparisonofdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonflexuralstrengthandelasticitymodulesofquartzandglassfiberbasedpostsanarrativereview
AT zadehelnaztavazo comparisonofdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonflexuralstrengthandelasticitymodulesofquartzandglassfiberbasedpostsanarrativereview
AT anzabirezamahmoudi comparisonofdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonflexuralstrengthandelasticitymodulesofquartzandglassfiberbasedpostsanarrativereview
AT asadihaniyeh comparisonofdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonflexuralstrengthandelasticitymodulesofquartzandglassfiberbasedpostsanarrativereview
AT fathiamirhossein comparisonofdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonflexuralstrengthandelasticitymodulesofquartzandglassfiberbasedpostsanarrativereview
AT gholamimahnaz comparisonofdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonflexuralstrengthandelasticitymodulesofquartzandglassfiberbasedpostsanarrativereview