Cargando…
Comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: A narrative review
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Evaluating the effect of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength (FS) and elasticity modules (EM) related to fiber posts is very important. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatment methods on FS and EM of quartz and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36994049 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_239_21 |
_version_ | 1784912614300581888 |
---|---|
author | Meimandinezhad, Marzieh Bidhendi, Hadi Mohammadi Zadeh, Elnaz Tavazo Anzabi, Reza Mahmoudi Asadi, Haniyeh Fathi, Amirhossein Gholami, Mahnaz |
author_facet | Meimandinezhad, Marzieh Bidhendi, Hadi Mohammadi Zadeh, Elnaz Tavazo Anzabi, Reza Mahmoudi Asadi, Haniyeh Fathi, Amirhossein Gholami, Mahnaz |
author_sort | Meimandinezhad, Marzieh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: Evaluating the effect of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength (FS) and elasticity modules (EM) related to fiber posts is very important. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatment methods on FS and EM of quartz and glass fiber-based posts in the form of a narrative review study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To conduct this study, all studies related to the subject under discussion during the years 2022–2000 by systematic search in internationally available databases, including Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar, were checked out. Finally, completely relevant studies were selected to investigate the main objective. RESULTS: The results showed that before surface preparation, FS and elasticity coefficient (EC) of quartz fiber-based posts were higher than glass fiber. According to the results of some previous studies, surface preparation of glass and quartz fiber posts by laser and 10% hydrogen peroxide has no effect on their FS and elasticity. Findings of some other studies showed that the laser method than air abrasion can be a more suitable method for preparing the surface of fiber posts before the bonding process. In some other studies, it was reported that the Airborne-particle abrasion (Al(2)O(3)) method produced a higher amount of FS than the laser. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of previous similar studies, it can be concluded that the results of previous studies are very contradictory, and therefore, it is not possible to provide a completely superior surface treatment method to increase flexural strength. The amount of flexural strength depends mainly on the intrinsic properties of the fiber post. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10041018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100410182023-03-28 Comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: A narrative review Meimandinezhad, Marzieh Bidhendi, Hadi Mohammadi Zadeh, Elnaz Tavazo Anzabi, Reza Mahmoudi Asadi, Haniyeh Fathi, Amirhossein Gholami, Mahnaz J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: Evaluating the effect of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength (FS) and elasticity modules (EM) related to fiber posts is very important. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatment methods on FS and EM of quartz and glass fiber-based posts in the form of a narrative review study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To conduct this study, all studies related to the subject under discussion during the years 2022–2000 by systematic search in internationally available databases, including Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar, were checked out. Finally, completely relevant studies were selected to investigate the main objective. RESULTS: The results showed that before surface preparation, FS and elasticity coefficient (EC) of quartz fiber-based posts were higher than glass fiber. According to the results of some previous studies, surface preparation of glass and quartz fiber posts by laser and 10% hydrogen peroxide has no effect on their FS and elasticity. Findings of some other studies showed that the laser method than air abrasion can be a more suitable method for preparing the surface of fiber posts before the bonding process. In some other studies, it was reported that the Airborne-particle abrasion (Al(2)O(3)) method produced a higher amount of FS than the laser. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of previous similar studies, it can be concluded that the results of previous studies are very contradictory, and therefore, it is not possible to provide a completely superior surface treatment method to increase flexural strength. The amount of flexural strength depends mainly on the intrinsic properties of the fiber post. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-12 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10041018/ /pubmed/36994049 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_239_21 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Meimandinezhad, Marzieh Bidhendi, Hadi Mohammadi Zadeh, Elnaz Tavazo Anzabi, Reza Mahmoudi Asadi, Haniyeh Fathi, Amirhossein Gholami, Mahnaz Comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: A narrative review |
title | Comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: A narrative review |
title_full | Comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: A narrative review |
title_fullStr | Comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: A narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: A narrative review |
title_short | Comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: A narrative review |
title_sort | comparison of different surface treatment methods on flexural strength and elasticity modules of quartz and glass fiber-based posts: a narrative review |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36994049 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_239_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meimandinezhadmarzieh comparisonofdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonflexuralstrengthandelasticitymodulesofquartzandglassfiberbasedpostsanarrativereview AT bidhendihadimohammadi comparisonofdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonflexuralstrengthandelasticitymodulesofquartzandglassfiberbasedpostsanarrativereview AT zadehelnaztavazo comparisonofdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonflexuralstrengthandelasticitymodulesofquartzandglassfiberbasedpostsanarrativereview AT anzabirezamahmoudi comparisonofdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonflexuralstrengthandelasticitymodulesofquartzandglassfiberbasedpostsanarrativereview AT asadihaniyeh comparisonofdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonflexuralstrengthandelasticitymodulesofquartzandglassfiberbasedpostsanarrativereview AT fathiamirhossein comparisonofdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonflexuralstrengthandelasticitymodulesofquartzandglassfiberbasedpostsanarrativereview AT gholamimahnaz comparisonofdifferentsurfacetreatmentmethodsonflexuralstrengthandelasticitymodulesofquartzandglassfiberbasedpostsanarrativereview |