Cargando…
Bacteremia due to non–Staphylococcus aureus gram-positive cocci and risk of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection carries significant morbidity and mortality with bacteremia being a possible marker of device infection. A clinical profile of non–Staphylococcus aureus gram-positive cocci (non-SA GPC) bacteremia in patients with CIED has bee...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36993918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2022.12.010 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection carries significant morbidity and mortality with bacteremia being a possible marker of device infection. A clinical profile of non–Staphylococcus aureus gram-positive cocci (non-SA GPC) bacteremia in patients with CIED has been limited. OBJECTIVE: To examine characteristics of patients with CIED who developed non-SA GPC bacteremia and risk of CIED infection. METHODS: We reviewed all patients with CIED who developed non-SA GPC bacteremia at the Mayo Clinic between 2012 and 2019. The 2019 European Heart Rhythm Association Consensus Document was used to define CIED infection. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients with CIED developed non-SA GPC bacteremia. CIED infection was present in 90 (56.3%) patients, in whom 60 (37.5%) were classified as definite and 30 (18.8%) as possible. This included 41 (45.6%) cases of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS), 30 (33.3%) cases of Enterococcus, 13 (14.4%) cases of viridans group streptococci (VGS), and 6 (6.7%) cases of other organisms. The adjusted odds of CIED infection in cases due to CoNS, Enterococcus, and VGS bacteremia were 19-, 14-, and 15-fold higher, respectively, as compared with other non-SA GPC. In patients with CIED infection, the reduction in risk of 1-year mortality associated with device removal was not statistically significant (hazard ratio 0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.26–1.33; P = .198). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of CIED infection in non-SA GPC bacteremia was higher than previously reported, particularly in cases due to CoNS, Enterococcus species, and VGS. However, a larger cohort is needed to demonstrate the benefit of CIED extraction in patients with infected CIED due to non-SA GPC. |
---|