Cargando…
Desaturation during the pandemic: Covid or cognitive bias?
The coronavirus pandemic has put an unprecedented strain on our health care system. An urgent need for timely and accurate diagnosis coupled with an inordinate caseload and myriad overlapping signs and symptoms with other differentials is leaving physicians fatigued. This often leads to the use of m...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36993068 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_833_22 |
_version_ | 1784912670918443008 |
---|---|
author | Nangia, Ritika Sethi, Chetna Arvind Dhiman, Niharika |
author_facet | Nangia, Ritika Sethi, Chetna Arvind Dhiman, Niharika |
author_sort | Nangia, Ritika |
collection | PubMed |
description | The coronavirus pandemic has put an unprecedented strain on our health care system. An urgent need for timely and accurate diagnosis coupled with an inordinate caseload and myriad overlapping signs and symptoms with other differentials is leaving physicians fatigued. This often leads to the use of mental shortcuts – “heuristics” by the strained mind and the inadvertent use of intuitive thought processes rather than the more controlled analytical thinking to cope and speed up the decision-making process. Availability bias – making a recent or vivid patient diagnosis more readily accessible to the mind – and anchoring bias – relying too heavily on a single symptom for deducing diagnosis – are among the most prevalent cognitive biases. Therefore, it is not unexpected that any new cases of acute onset respiratory illness may be mis-diagnosed as coronavirus disease 2019 during the pandemic, significantly impacting the morbidity and mortality of true diagnosis. To reduce the risk of patient harm, it is therefore imperative that medical practitioners be aware of the existence and influence of cognitive bias in clinical decision making and maintain sight of a variety of differential diagnoses to ensure that no adverse condition is overlooked. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10041246 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100412462023-03-28 Desaturation during the pandemic: Covid or cognitive bias? Nangia, Ritika Sethi, Chetna Arvind Dhiman, Niharika J Family Med Prim Care Case Series The coronavirus pandemic has put an unprecedented strain on our health care system. An urgent need for timely and accurate diagnosis coupled with an inordinate caseload and myriad overlapping signs and symptoms with other differentials is leaving physicians fatigued. This often leads to the use of mental shortcuts – “heuristics” by the strained mind and the inadvertent use of intuitive thought processes rather than the more controlled analytical thinking to cope and speed up the decision-making process. Availability bias – making a recent or vivid patient diagnosis more readily accessible to the mind – and anchoring bias – relying too heavily on a single symptom for deducing diagnosis – are among the most prevalent cognitive biases. Therefore, it is not unexpected that any new cases of acute onset respiratory illness may be mis-diagnosed as coronavirus disease 2019 during the pandemic, significantly impacting the morbidity and mortality of true diagnosis. To reduce the risk of patient harm, it is therefore imperative that medical practitioners be aware of the existence and influence of cognitive bias in clinical decision making and maintain sight of a variety of differential diagnoses to ensure that no adverse condition is overlooked. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-11 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10041246/ /pubmed/36993068 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_833_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Case Series Nangia, Ritika Sethi, Chetna Arvind Dhiman, Niharika Desaturation during the pandemic: Covid or cognitive bias? |
title | Desaturation during the pandemic: Covid or cognitive bias? |
title_full | Desaturation during the pandemic: Covid or cognitive bias? |
title_fullStr | Desaturation during the pandemic: Covid or cognitive bias? |
title_full_unstemmed | Desaturation during the pandemic: Covid or cognitive bias? |
title_short | Desaturation during the pandemic: Covid or cognitive bias? |
title_sort | desaturation during the pandemic: covid or cognitive bias? |
topic | Case Series |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36993068 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_833_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nangiaritika desaturationduringthepandemiccovidorcognitivebias AT sethichetnaarvind desaturationduringthepandemiccovidorcognitivebias AT dhimanniharika desaturationduringthepandemiccovidorcognitivebias |