Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of 0.05% micellar nano-particulate (MNP) cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in the treatment of moderate-to-severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Keratoconjunctivitis sicca or dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disorder underpinned by a complex inflammatory cycle. Introduction of topical cyclosporine has been a significant advance in the management of DED. In recent years advancements in formulation technology have led to d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rao, A Tarakeswara, Gupta, Amit, Chauhan, Tulika, Basu, Sayan, Batra, Nitin, Sharma, Namrata, Sangwan, Virender S, Gupta, Vinay, Mukherjee, Shoibal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36973703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02838-z
_version_ 1784912725849145344
author Rao, A Tarakeswara
Gupta, Amit
Chauhan, Tulika
Basu, Sayan
Batra, Nitin
Sharma, Namrata
Sangwan, Virender S
Gupta, Vinay
Mukherjee, Shoibal
author_facet Rao, A Tarakeswara
Gupta, Amit
Chauhan, Tulika
Basu, Sayan
Batra, Nitin
Sharma, Namrata
Sangwan, Virender S
Gupta, Vinay
Mukherjee, Shoibal
author_sort Rao, A Tarakeswara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Keratoconjunctivitis sicca or dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disorder underpinned by a complex inflammatory cycle. Introduction of topical cyclosporine has been a significant advance in the management of DED. In recent years advancements in formulation technology have led to development of micellar nano-particulate (MNP) cyclosporine formulations that promise better penetration into ocular target tissues and potential for reduced ocular surface irritation. METHODS: We compared two dosing regimes of a proprietary MNP cyclosporine emulsion with the widely marketed topical cyclosporine formulation Restasis™ in a multicenter parallel-group randomised trial in patients with DED. Patients were randomised to one of 3 treatment groups with 90 patients eligible for the per protocol analysis: 30 in the higher dose test arm A; 32 in the lower dose test arm B; and 28 in the Restasis™ control arm C. All scored efficacy endpoints were tested for significance by comparing the mean change in scores from baseline in the test groups with that in the control group at 12 weeks, using the Student’s t test. Wilcoxon’s rank sum test was used to test individual symptom scores and clinician’s global evaluation of treatment grades. RESULTS: Corneal fluorescein staining score, the primary efficacy endpoint, decreased by 6.8 ± 4.0, 5.7 ± 3.9, and 4.6 ± 3.6 points in the 3 groups respectively, indicating superior efficacy in test arm A in comparison to control arm C (p = 0.0026). Schirmer’s tear test, conjunctival lissamine staining score, ocular surface disease index, and individual dry eye symptom scores also favoured higher dose MNP cyclosporine over Restasis™. The study failed to differentiate the treatment arms in terms of clinician’s global evaluation of treatment, use of tear substitutes, best corrected visual acuity or safety and toleration. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the dose of 1 drop of a 0.05% w/v ophthalmic emulsion of MNP cyclosporine administered topically twice daily yields better outcomes at 12 weeks than the lower dose tested in the study, and is more efficacious than an equivalent dose of Restasis™, the active control used in the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of India on 29/03/2019, and was assigned registration number CTRI/2019/03/018319.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10041473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100414732023-03-27 Efficacy and safety of 0.05% micellar nano-particulate (MNP) cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in the treatment of moderate-to-severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled trial Rao, A Tarakeswara Gupta, Amit Chauhan, Tulika Basu, Sayan Batra, Nitin Sharma, Namrata Sangwan, Virender S Gupta, Vinay Mukherjee, Shoibal BMC Ophthalmol Research BACKGROUND: Keratoconjunctivitis sicca or dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disorder underpinned by a complex inflammatory cycle. Introduction of topical cyclosporine has been a significant advance in the management of DED. In recent years advancements in formulation technology have led to development of micellar nano-particulate (MNP) cyclosporine formulations that promise better penetration into ocular target tissues and potential for reduced ocular surface irritation. METHODS: We compared two dosing regimes of a proprietary MNP cyclosporine emulsion with the widely marketed topical cyclosporine formulation Restasis™ in a multicenter parallel-group randomised trial in patients with DED. Patients were randomised to one of 3 treatment groups with 90 patients eligible for the per protocol analysis: 30 in the higher dose test arm A; 32 in the lower dose test arm B; and 28 in the Restasis™ control arm C. All scored efficacy endpoints were tested for significance by comparing the mean change in scores from baseline in the test groups with that in the control group at 12 weeks, using the Student’s t test. Wilcoxon’s rank sum test was used to test individual symptom scores and clinician’s global evaluation of treatment grades. RESULTS: Corneal fluorescein staining score, the primary efficacy endpoint, decreased by 6.8 ± 4.0, 5.7 ± 3.9, and 4.6 ± 3.6 points in the 3 groups respectively, indicating superior efficacy in test arm A in comparison to control arm C (p = 0.0026). Schirmer’s tear test, conjunctival lissamine staining score, ocular surface disease index, and individual dry eye symptom scores also favoured higher dose MNP cyclosporine over Restasis™. The study failed to differentiate the treatment arms in terms of clinician’s global evaluation of treatment, use of tear substitutes, best corrected visual acuity or safety and toleration. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the dose of 1 drop of a 0.05% w/v ophthalmic emulsion of MNP cyclosporine administered topically twice daily yields better outcomes at 12 weeks than the lower dose tested in the study, and is more efficacious than an equivalent dose of Restasis™, the active control used in the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of India on 29/03/2019, and was assigned registration number CTRI/2019/03/018319. BioMed Central 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10041473/ /pubmed/36973703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02838-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Rao, A Tarakeswara
Gupta, Amit
Chauhan, Tulika
Basu, Sayan
Batra, Nitin
Sharma, Namrata
Sangwan, Virender S
Gupta, Vinay
Mukherjee, Shoibal
Efficacy and safety of 0.05% micellar nano-particulate (MNP) cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in the treatment of moderate-to-severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled trial
title Efficacy and safety of 0.05% micellar nano-particulate (MNP) cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in the treatment of moderate-to-severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled trial
title_full Efficacy and safety of 0.05% micellar nano-particulate (MNP) cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in the treatment of moderate-to-severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of 0.05% micellar nano-particulate (MNP) cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in the treatment of moderate-to-severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of 0.05% micellar nano-particulate (MNP) cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in the treatment of moderate-to-severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled trial
title_short Efficacy and safety of 0.05% micellar nano-particulate (MNP) cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in the treatment of moderate-to-severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of 0.05% micellar nano-particulate (mnp) cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in the treatment of moderate-to-severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36973703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02838-z
work_keys_str_mv AT raoatarakeswara efficacyandsafetyof005micellarnanoparticulatemnpcyclosporineophthalmicemulsioninthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverekeratoconjunctivitissiccaa12weekmulticenterrandomizedactivecontrolledtrial
AT guptaamit efficacyandsafetyof005micellarnanoparticulatemnpcyclosporineophthalmicemulsioninthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverekeratoconjunctivitissiccaa12weekmulticenterrandomizedactivecontrolledtrial
AT chauhantulika efficacyandsafetyof005micellarnanoparticulatemnpcyclosporineophthalmicemulsioninthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverekeratoconjunctivitissiccaa12weekmulticenterrandomizedactivecontrolledtrial
AT basusayan efficacyandsafetyof005micellarnanoparticulatemnpcyclosporineophthalmicemulsioninthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverekeratoconjunctivitissiccaa12weekmulticenterrandomizedactivecontrolledtrial
AT batranitin efficacyandsafetyof005micellarnanoparticulatemnpcyclosporineophthalmicemulsioninthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverekeratoconjunctivitissiccaa12weekmulticenterrandomizedactivecontrolledtrial
AT sharmanamrata efficacyandsafetyof005micellarnanoparticulatemnpcyclosporineophthalmicemulsioninthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverekeratoconjunctivitissiccaa12weekmulticenterrandomizedactivecontrolledtrial
AT sangwanvirenders efficacyandsafetyof005micellarnanoparticulatemnpcyclosporineophthalmicemulsioninthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverekeratoconjunctivitissiccaa12weekmulticenterrandomizedactivecontrolledtrial
AT guptavinay efficacyandsafetyof005micellarnanoparticulatemnpcyclosporineophthalmicemulsioninthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverekeratoconjunctivitissiccaa12weekmulticenterrandomizedactivecontrolledtrial
AT mukherjeeshoibal efficacyandsafetyof005micellarnanoparticulatemnpcyclosporineophthalmicemulsioninthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverekeratoconjunctivitissiccaa12weekmulticenterrandomizedactivecontrolledtrial