Cargando…
Workplace flexibility, work–family interface, and psychological distress: differences by family caregiving obligations and gender
Drawing on data from the 2008 U.S. National Study of the Changing Workforce, this study (1) examines the associations between access to three types of flexible working arrangements—flextime, flexplace, and culture of flexibility—and psychological distress, (2) tests the mediating roles of work–famil...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-023-10164-1 |
_version_ | 1784912734731632640 |
---|---|
author | Yucel, Deniz Fan, Wen |
author_facet | Yucel, Deniz Fan, Wen |
author_sort | Yucel, Deniz |
collection | PubMed |
description | Drawing on data from the 2008 U.S. National Study of the Changing Workforce, this study (1) examines the associations between access to three types of flexible working arrangements—flextime, flexplace, and culture of flexibility—and psychological distress, (2) tests the mediating roles of work–family conflict and work–family enrichment, and (3) investigates whether these relationships differ by workers’ childcare or elder-care obligations as they intersect with gender. Results show that a flexible workplace culture, but not access to flextime or flexplace, is associated with lower psychological distress. Work–family conflict and work–family enrichment partially mediate the relationship between culture of flexibility and psychological distress. In addition, the negative effect of culture of flexibility on psychological distress is stronger among workers sandwiched between preschool childcare and elder-care compared with those with neither caregiving obligations, a pattern especially pronounced among women. We discuss these results and their implications for organizational practices and worker well-being. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10041508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100415082023-03-27 Workplace flexibility, work–family interface, and psychological distress: differences by family caregiving obligations and gender Yucel, Deniz Fan, Wen Appl Res Qual Life Article Drawing on data from the 2008 U.S. National Study of the Changing Workforce, this study (1) examines the associations between access to three types of flexible working arrangements—flextime, flexplace, and culture of flexibility—and psychological distress, (2) tests the mediating roles of work–family conflict and work–family enrichment, and (3) investigates whether these relationships differ by workers’ childcare or elder-care obligations as they intersect with gender. Results show that a flexible workplace culture, but not access to flextime or flexplace, is associated with lower psychological distress. Work–family conflict and work–family enrichment partially mediate the relationship between culture of flexibility and psychological distress. In addition, the negative effect of culture of flexibility on psychological distress is stronger among workers sandwiched between preschool childcare and elder-care compared with those with neither caregiving obligations, a pattern especially pronounced among women. We discuss these results and their implications for organizational practices and worker well-being. Springer Netherlands 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10041508/ /pubmed/37359217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-023-10164-1 Text en © The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) and Springer Nature B.V. 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Yucel, Deniz Fan, Wen Workplace flexibility, work–family interface, and psychological distress: differences by family caregiving obligations and gender |
title | Workplace flexibility, work–family interface, and psychological distress: differences by family caregiving obligations and gender |
title_full | Workplace flexibility, work–family interface, and psychological distress: differences by family caregiving obligations and gender |
title_fullStr | Workplace flexibility, work–family interface, and psychological distress: differences by family caregiving obligations and gender |
title_full_unstemmed | Workplace flexibility, work–family interface, and psychological distress: differences by family caregiving obligations and gender |
title_short | Workplace flexibility, work–family interface, and psychological distress: differences by family caregiving obligations and gender |
title_sort | workplace flexibility, work–family interface, and psychological distress: differences by family caregiving obligations and gender |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-023-10164-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuceldeniz workplaceflexibilityworkfamilyinterfaceandpsychologicaldistressdifferencesbyfamilycaregivingobligationsandgender AT fanwen workplaceflexibilityworkfamilyinterfaceandpsychologicaldistressdifferencesbyfamilycaregivingobligationsandgender |