Cargando…

Healthcare professionals’ perceived barriers and facilitators of implementing clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To identify healthcare professionals’ perceived barriers and facilitators to clinical practice guideline implementation within stroke rehabilitation. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, Cochrane library, Academic Search Complete and Scopus. Additional papers were identified throu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cormican, Adrienne, Hirani, Shashivadan P, McKeown, Eamonn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36475911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692155221141036
_version_ 1784912750186594304
author Cormican, Adrienne
Hirani, Shashivadan P
McKeown, Eamonn
author_facet Cormican, Adrienne
Hirani, Shashivadan P
McKeown, Eamonn
author_sort Cormican, Adrienne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify healthcare professionals’ perceived barriers and facilitators to clinical practice guideline implementation within stroke rehabilitation. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, Cochrane library, Academic Search Complete and Scopus. Additional papers were identified through hand searching. REVIEW METHODS: The review followed the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols systematic review approach. Any empirical research that provided qualitative data on healthcare professionals’ perceived factors influencing clinical guideline implementation in stroke rehabilitation was included. One reviewer screened all titles and abstract reviews (n = 669). Another two reviewers independently screened 30% of title and abstract reviews, followed by full-text reviews (n = 61). Study quality was assessed using the mixed-method appraisal tool. RESULTS: Data from 10 qualitative, six quantitative and six mixed-method studies published between 2000 and 2022, involving 1576 participants in total, were analysed and synthesised using modified thematic synthesis approach. The majority of participants were therapists n = 1297 (occupational therapists, physiotherapists, speech and language therapists). Organisational factors (time constraints, resources) alongside healthcare professionals’ lack of knowledge and skills were the most cited barriers to guideline implementation. Contradictory attitudes and beliefs towards stroke guidelines applicability to real-life clinical practice and their evidence base were reported. Organisational support in the form of training, local protocols, performance monitoring and leadership were reported as perceived facilitators. CONCLUSION: Barriers and facilitators are multifactorial and were identified at guideline, individual, team and organisational levels. There is a need to translate perceived barriers and facilitators into implementation interventions especially addressing organisational-level barriers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10041573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100415732023-03-28 Healthcare professionals’ perceived barriers and facilitators of implementing clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review Cormican, Adrienne Hirani, Shashivadan P McKeown, Eamonn Clin Rehabil Exploratory Studies OBJECTIVE: To identify healthcare professionals’ perceived barriers and facilitators to clinical practice guideline implementation within stroke rehabilitation. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, Cochrane library, Academic Search Complete and Scopus. Additional papers were identified through hand searching. REVIEW METHODS: The review followed the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols systematic review approach. Any empirical research that provided qualitative data on healthcare professionals’ perceived factors influencing clinical guideline implementation in stroke rehabilitation was included. One reviewer screened all titles and abstract reviews (n = 669). Another two reviewers independently screened 30% of title and abstract reviews, followed by full-text reviews (n = 61). Study quality was assessed using the mixed-method appraisal tool. RESULTS: Data from 10 qualitative, six quantitative and six mixed-method studies published between 2000 and 2022, involving 1576 participants in total, were analysed and synthesised using modified thematic synthesis approach. The majority of participants were therapists n = 1297 (occupational therapists, physiotherapists, speech and language therapists). Organisational factors (time constraints, resources) alongside healthcare professionals’ lack of knowledge and skills were the most cited barriers to guideline implementation. Contradictory attitudes and beliefs towards stroke guidelines applicability to real-life clinical practice and their evidence base were reported. Organisational support in the form of training, local protocols, performance monitoring and leadership were reported as perceived facilitators. CONCLUSION: Barriers and facilitators are multifactorial and were identified at guideline, individual, team and organisational levels. There is a need to translate perceived barriers and facilitators into implementation interventions especially addressing organisational-level barriers. SAGE Publications 2022-12-07 2023-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10041573/ /pubmed/36475911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692155221141036 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Exploratory Studies
Cormican, Adrienne
Hirani, Shashivadan P
McKeown, Eamonn
Healthcare professionals’ perceived barriers and facilitators of implementing clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review
title Healthcare professionals’ perceived barriers and facilitators of implementing clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review
title_full Healthcare professionals’ perceived barriers and facilitators of implementing clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review
title_fullStr Healthcare professionals’ perceived barriers and facilitators of implementing clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare professionals’ perceived barriers and facilitators of implementing clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review
title_short Healthcare professionals’ perceived barriers and facilitators of implementing clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review
title_sort healthcare professionals’ perceived barriers and facilitators of implementing clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review
topic Exploratory Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36475911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692155221141036
work_keys_str_mv AT cormicanadrienne healthcareprofessionalsperceivedbarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingclinicalpracticeguidelinesforstrokerehabilitationasystematicreview
AT hiranishashivadanp healthcareprofessionalsperceivedbarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingclinicalpracticeguidelinesforstrokerehabilitationasystematicreview
AT mckeowneamonn healthcareprofessionalsperceivedbarriersandfacilitatorsofimplementingclinicalpracticeguidelinesforstrokerehabilitationasystematicreview