Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance strain analysis and atrial size to identify heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
AIMS: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) continues to be a diagnostic challenge. Cardiac magnetic resonance atrial measurement, feature tracking (CMR-FT), tagging has long been suggested to diagnose HFpEF and potentially complement echocardiography especially when echocardiograph...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36992915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead021 |
_version_ | 1784912768827129856 |
---|---|
author | Ng, Ming-Yen Kwan, Chi Ting Yap, Pui Min Fung, Sau Yung Tang, Hok Shing Tse, Wan Wai Vivian Kwan, Cheuk Nam Felix Chow, Yin Hay Phoebe Yiu, Nga Ching Lee, Yung Pok Fong, Ambrose Ho Tung Hwang, Subin Fong, Zachary Fai Wang Ren, Qing-Wen Wu, Mei-Zhen Wan, Eric Yuk Fai Lee, Ka Chun Kevin Leung, Chun Yu Li, Andrew Montero, David Vardhanabhuti, Varut Hai, JoJo Siu, Chung-Wah Tse, Hung-Fat Pennell, Dudley John Mohiaddin, Raad Senior, Roxy Yiu, Kai-Hang |
author_facet | Ng, Ming-Yen Kwan, Chi Ting Yap, Pui Min Fung, Sau Yung Tang, Hok Shing Tse, Wan Wai Vivian Kwan, Cheuk Nam Felix Chow, Yin Hay Phoebe Yiu, Nga Ching Lee, Yung Pok Fong, Ambrose Ho Tung Hwang, Subin Fong, Zachary Fai Wang Ren, Qing-Wen Wu, Mei-Zhen Wan, Eric Yuk Fai Lee, Ka Chun Kevin Leung, Chun Yu Li, Andrew Montero, David Vardhanabhuti, Varut Hai, JoJo Siu, Chung-Wah Tse, Hung-Fat Pennell, Dudley John Mohiaddin, Raad Senior, Roxy Yiu, Kai-Hang |
author_sort | Ng, Ming-Yen |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) continues to be a diagnostic challenge. Cardiac magnetic resonance atrial measurement, feature tracking (CMR-FT), tagging has long been suggested to diagnose HFpEF and potentially complement echocardiography especially when echocardiography is indeterminate. Data supporting the use of CMR atrial measurements, CMR-FT or tagging, are absent. Our aim is to conduct a prospective case-control study assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CMR atrial volume/area, CMR-FT, and tagging to diagnose HFpEF amongst patients suspected of having HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one suspected HFpEF patients were prospectively recruited from four centres. Patients underwent echocardiography, CMR, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurements within 24 h to diagnose HFpEF. Patients without HFpEF diagnosis underwent catheter pressure measurements or stress echocardiography to confirm HFpEF or non-HFpEF. Area under the curve (AUC) was determined by comparing HFpEF with non-HFpEF patients. Fifty-three HFpEF (median age 78 years, interquartile range 74–82 years) and thirty-eight non-HFpEF (median age 70 years, interquartile range 64–76 years) were recruited. Cardiac magnetic resonance left atrial (LA) reservoir strain (ResS), LA area index (LAAi), and LA volume index (LAVi) had the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUCs 0.803, 0.815, and 0.776, respectively). Left atrial ResS, LAAi, and LAVi had significantly better diagnostic accuracy than CMR-FT left ventricle (LV)/right ventricle (RV) parameters and tagging (P < 0.01). Tagging circumferential and radial strain had poor diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.644 and 0.541, respectively). CONCLUSION: Cardiac magnetic resonance LA ResS, LAAi, and LAVi have the highest diagnostic accuracy to identify HFpEF patients from non-HFpEF patients amongst clinically suspected HFpEF patients. Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking LV/RV parameters and tagging had low diagnostic accuracy to diagnose HFpEF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10041670 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100416702023-03-28 Diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance strain analysis and atrial size to identify heart failure with preserved ejection fraction Ng, Ming-Yen Kwan, Chi Ting Yap, Pui Min Fung, Sau Yung Tang, Hok Shing Tse, Wan Wai Vivian Kwan, Cheuk Nam Felix Chow, Yin Hay Phoebe Yiu, Nga Ching Lee, Yung Pok Fong, Ambrose Ho Tung Hwang, Subin Fong, Zachary Fai Wang Ren, Qing-Wen Wu, Mei-Zhen Wan, Eric Yuk Fai Lee, Ka Chun Kevin Leung, Chun Yu Li, Andrew Montero, David Vardhanabhuti, Varut Hai, JoJo Siu, Chung-Wah Tse, Hung-Fat Pennell, Dudley John Mohiaddin, Raad Senior, Roxy Yiu, Kai-Hang Eur Heart J Open Original Article AIMS: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) continues to be a diagnostic challenge. Cardiac magnetic resonance atrial measurement, feature tracking (CMR-FT), tagging has long been suggested to diagnose HFpEF and potentially complement echocardiography especially when echocardiography is indeterminate. Data supporting the use of CMR atrial measurements, CMR-FT or tagging, are absent. Our aim is to conduct a prospective case-control study assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CMR atrial volume/area, CMR-FT, and tagging to diagnose HFpEF amongst patients suspected of having HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one suspected HFpEF patients were prospectively recruited from four centres. Patients underwent echocardiography, CMR, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurements within 24 h to diagnose HFpEF. Patients without HFpEF diagnosis underwent catheter pressure measurements or stress echocardiography to confirm HFpEF or non-HFpEF. Area under the curve (AUC) was determined by comparing HFpEF with non-HFpEF patients. Fifty-three HFpEF (median age 78 years, interquartile range 74–82 years) and thirty-eight non-HFpEF (median age 70 years, interquartile range 64–76 years) were recruited. Cardiac magnetic resonance left atrial (LA) reservoir strain (ResS), LA area index (LAAi), and LA volume index (LAVi) had the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUCs 0.803, 0.815, and 0.776, respectively). Left atrial ResS, LAAi, and LAVi had significantly better diagnostic accuracy than CMR-FT left ventricle (LV)/right ventricle (RV) parameters and tagging (P < 0.01). Tagging circumferential and radial strain had poor diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.644 and 0.541, respectively). CONCLUSION: Cardiac magnetic resonance LA ResS, LAAi, and LAVi have the highest diagnostic accuracy to identify HFpEF patients from non-HFpEF patients amongst clinically suspected HFpEF patients. Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking LV/RV parameters and tagging had low diagnostic accuracy to diagnose HFpEF. Oxford University Press 2023-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10041670/ /pubmed/36992915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead021 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ng, Ming-Yen Kwan, Chi Ting Yap, Pui Min Fung, Sau Yung Tang, Hok Shing Tse, Wan Wai Vivian Kwan, Cheuk Nam Felix Chow, Yin Hay Phoebe Yiu, Nga Ching Lee, Yung Pok Fong, Ambrose Ho Tung Hwang, Subin Fong, Zachary Fai Wang Ren, Qing-Wen Wu, Mei-Zhen Wan, Eric Yuk Fai Lee, Ka Chun Kevin Leung, Chun Yu Li, Andrew Montero, David Vardhanabhuti, Varut Hai, JoJo Siu, Chung-Wah Tse, Hung-Fat Pennell, Dudley John Mohiaddin, Raad Senior, Roxy Yiu, Kai-Hang Diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance strain analysis and atrial size to identify heart failure with preserved ejection fraction |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance strain analysis and atrial size to identify heart failure with preserved ejection fraction |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance strain analysis and atrial size to identify heart failure with preserved ejection fraction |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance strain analysis and atrial size to identify heart failure with preserved ejection fraction |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance strain analysis and atrial size to identify heart failure with preserved ejection fraction |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance strain analysis and atrial size to identify heart failure with preserved ejection fraction |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance strain analysis and atrial size to identify heart failure with preserved ejection fraction |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36992915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ngmingyen diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT kwanchiting diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT yappuimin diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT fungsauyung diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT tanghokshing diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT tsewanwaivivian diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT kwancheuknamfelix diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT chowyinhayphoebe diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT yiungaching diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT leeyungpok diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT fongambrosehotung diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT hwangsubin diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT fongzacharyfaiwang diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT renqingwen diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT wumeizhen diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT wanericyukfai diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT leekachunkevin diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT leungchunyu diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT liandrew diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT monterodavid diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT vardhanabhutivarut diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT haijojo diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT siuchungwah diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT tsehungfat diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT pennelldudleyjohn diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT mohiaddinraad diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT seniorroxy diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction AT yiukaihang diagnosticaccuracyofcardiovascularmagneticresonancestrainanalysisandatrialsizetoidentifyheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction |