Cargando…
RESVECH 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for Brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers
OBJECTIVES: to cross-culturally adapt the scale Resultados en la valoración y evolución de la cicatrización de las heridas - RESVECH 2.0 for Brazilian Portuguese; to estimate the internal consistency and construct and criterion validity of the scale in the evaluation of venous ulcers. METHODS: metho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36995821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0185 |
_version_ | 1784912945148329984 |
---|---|
author | Menegon, Marina Rosa Malaquias, Suelen Gomes da Silva, Joana Aragão de Oliveira, Beatriz Guitton Renaud Baptista Medrano, Juan Carlos Restrepo Verdú-Soriano, José Bachion, Maria Márcia |
author_facet | Menegon, Marina Rosa Malaquias, Suelen Gomes da Silva, Joana Aragão de Oliveira, Beatriz Guitton Renaud Baptista Medrano, Juan Carlos Restrepo Verdú-Soriano, José Bachion, Maria Márcia |
author_sort | Menegon, Marina Rosa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: to cross-culturally adapt the scale Resultados en la valoración y evolución de la cicatrización de las heridas - RESVECH 2.0 for Brazilian Portuguese; to estimate the internal consistency and construct and criterion validity of the scale in the evaluation of venous ulcers. METHODS: methodological study, based on international guidelines for studies of this type. Wounds were evaluated using the RESVECH 2.0 and Pressure Ulcer Scale of Healing 3.0 (PUSH). Descriptive analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha and Spearman’s correlation (p<0.05) were used. RESULTS: 12 nurses and 77 people with 153 venous ulcers participated in the study. The translation was successful, the proposed factor model was validated, and Cronbach ‘s alpha = 0.832 (95%CI, 0.780-0.880) and correlation coefficient (RESVECH 2.0 and PUSH 3.0) = 0.74 were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: the adaptation of RESVECH 2.0 to Brazilian Portuguese is robust. Reliability and validity show compatibility for use in the country in the evaluation of venous ulcers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10042478 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100424782023-03-28 RESVECH 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for Brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers Menegon, Marina Rosa Malaquias, Suelen Gomes da Silva, Joana Aragão de Oliveira, Beatriz Guitton Renaud Baptista Medrano, Juan Carlos Restrepo Verdú-Soriano, José Bachion, Maria Márcia Rev Bras Enferm Original Article OBJECTIVES: to cross-culturally adapt the scale Resultados en la valoración y evolución de la cicatrización de las heridas - RESVECH 2.0 for Brazilian Portuguese; to estimate the internal consistency and construct and criterion validity of the scale in the evaluation of venous ulcers. METHODS: methodological study, based on international guidelines for studies of this type. Wounds were evaluated using the RESVECH 2.0 and Pressure Ulcer Scale of Healing 3.0 (PUSH). Descriptive analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha and Spearman’s correlation (p<0.05) were used. RESULTS: 12 nurses and 77 people with 153 venous ulcers participated in the study. The translation was successful, the proposed factor model was validated, and Cronbach ‘s alpha = 0.832 (95%CI, 0.780-0.880) and correlation coefficient (RESVECH 2.0 and PUSH 3.0) = 0.74 were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: the adaptation of RESVECH 2.0 to Brazilian Portuguese is robust. Reliability and validity show compatibility for use in the country in the evaluation of venous ulcers. Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10042478/ /pubmed/36995821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0185 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Menegon, Marina Rosa Malaquias, Suelen Gomes da Silva, Joana Aragão de Oliveira, Beatriz Guitton Renaud Baptista Medrano, Juan Carlos Restrepo Verdú-Soriano, José Bachion, Maria Márcia RESVECH 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for Brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers |
title | RESVECH 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for Brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers |
title_full | RESVECH 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for Brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers |
title_fullStr | RESVECH 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for Brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers |
title_full_unstemmed | RESVECH 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for Brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers |
title_short | RESVECH 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for Brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers |
title_sort | resvech 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36995821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT menegonmarinarosa resvech20crossculturaladaptationforbrazilreliabilityandvalidityfortheevaluationofvenousulcers AT malaquiassuelengomes resvech20crossculturaladaptationforbrazilreliabilityandvalidityfortheevaluationofvenousulcers AT dasilvajoanaaragao resvech20crossculturaladaptationforbrazilreliabilityandvalidityfortheevaluationofvenousulcers AT deoliveirabeatrizguittonrenaudbaptista resvech20crossculturaladaptationforbrazilreliabilityandvalidityfortheevaluationofvenousulcers AT medranojuancarlosrestrepo resvech20crossculturaladaptationforbrazilreliabilityandvalidityfortheevaluationofvenousulcers AT verdusorianojose resvech20crossculturaladaptationforbrazilreliabilityandvalidityfortheevaluationofvenousulcers AT bachionmariamarcia resvech20crossculturaladaptationforbrazilreliabilityandvalidityfortheevaluationofvenousulcers |