Cargando…

RESVECH 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for Brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers

OBJECTIVES: to cross-culturally adapt the scale Resultados en la valoración y evolución de la cicatrización de las heridas - RESVECH 2.0 for Brazilian Portuguese; to estimate the internal consistency and construct and criterion validity of the scale in the evaluation of venous ulcers. METHODS: metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menegon, Marina Rosa, Malaquias, Suelen Gomes, da Silva, Joana Aragão, de Oliveira, Beatriz Guitton Renaud Baptista, Medrano, Juan Carlos Restrepo, Verdú-Soriano, José, Bachion, Maria Márcia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36995821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0185
_version_ 1784912945148329984
author Menegon, Marina Rosa
Malaquias, Suelen Gomes
da Silva, Joana Aragão
de Oliveira, Beatriz Guitton Renaud Baptista
Medrano, Juan Carlos Restrepo
Verdú-Soriano, José
Bachion, Maria Márcia
author_facet Menegon, Marina Rosa
Malaquias, Suelen Gomes
da Silva, Joana Aragão
de Oliveira, Beatriz Guitton Renaud Baptista
Medrano, Juan Carlos Restrepo
Verdú-Soriano, José
Bachion, Maria Márcia
author_sort Menegon, Marina Rosa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: to cross-culturally adapt the scale Resultados en la valoración y evolución de la cicatrización de las heridas - RESVECH 2.0 for Brazilian Portuguese; to estimate the internal consistency and construct and criterion validity of the scale in the evaluation of venous ulcers. METHODS: methodological study, based on international guidelines for studies of this type. Wounds were evaluated using the RESVECH 2.0 and Pressure Ulcer Scale of Healing 3.0 (PUSH). Descriptive analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha and Spearman’s correlation (p<0.05) were used. RESULTS: 12 nurses and 77 people with 153 venous ulcers participated in the study. The translation was successful, the proposed factor model was validated, and Cronbach ‘s alpha = 0.832 (95%CI, 0.780-0.880) and correlation coefficient (RESVECH 2.0 and PUSH 3.0) = 0.74 were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: the adaptation of RESVECH 2.0 to Brazilian Portuguese is robust. Reliability and validity show compatibility for use in the country in the evaluation of venous ulcers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10042478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100424782023-03-28 RESVECH 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for Brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers Menegon, Marina Rosa Malaquias, Suelen Gomes da Silva, Joana Aragão de Oliveira, Beatriz Guitton Renaud Baptista Medrano, Juan Carlos Restrepo Verdú-Soriano, José Bachion, Maria Márcia Rev Bras Enferm Original Article OBJECTIVES: to cross-culturally adapt the scale Resultados en la valoración y evolución de la cicatrización de las heridas - RESVECH 2.0 for Brazilian Portuguese; to estimate the internal consistency and construct and criterion validity of the scale in the evaluation of venous ulcers. METHODS: methodological study, based on international guidelines for studies of this type. Wounds were evaluated using the RESVECH 2.0 and Pressure Ulcer Scale of Healing 3.0 (PUSH). Descriptive analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha and Spearman’s correlation (p<0.05) were used. RESULTS: 12 nurses and 77 people with 153 venous ulcers participated in the study. The translation was successful, the proposed factor model was validated, and Cronbach ‘s alpha = 0.832 (95%CI, 0.780-0.880) and correlation coefficient (RESVECH 2.0 and PUSH 3.0) = 0.74 were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: the adaptation of RESVECH 2.0 to Brazilian Portuguese is robust. Reliability and validity show compatibility for use in the country in the evaluation of venous ulcers. Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10042478/ /pubmed/36995821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0185 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Menegon, Marina Rosa
Malaquias, Suelen Gomes
da Silva, Joana Aragão
de Oliveira, Beatriz Guitton Renaud Baptista
Medrano, Juan Carlos Restrepo
Verdú-Soriano, José
Bachion, Maria Márcia
RESVECH 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for Brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers
title RESVECH 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for Brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers
title_full RESVECH 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for Brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers
title_fullStr RESVECH 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for Brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers
title_full_unstemmed RESVECH 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for Brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers
title_short RESVECH 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for Brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers
title_sort resvech 2.0: cross-cultural adaptation for brazil, reliability and validity for the evaluation of venous ulcers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36995821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0185
work_keys_str_mv AT menegonmarinarosa resvech20crossculturaladaptationforbrazilreliabilityandvalidityfortheevaluationofvenousulcers
AT malaquiassuelengomes resvech20crossculturaladaptationforbrazilreliabilityandvalidityfortheevaluationofvenousulcers
AT dasilvajoanaaragao resvech20crossculturaladaptationforbrazilreliabilityandvalidityfortheevaluationofvenousulcers
AT deoliveirabeatrizguittonrenaudbaptista resvech20crossculturaladaptationforbrazilreliabilityandvalidityfortheevaluationofvenousulcers
AT medranojuancarlosrestrepo resvech20crossculturaladaptationforbrazilreliabilityandvalidityfortheevaluationofvenousulcers
AT verdusorianojose resvech20crossculturaladaptationforbrazilreliabilityandvalidityfortheevaluationofvenousulcers
AT bachionmariamarcia resvech20crossculturaladaptationforbrazilreliabilityandvalidityfortheevaluationofvenousulcers