Cargando…

The 1-2-3 cm Advancement Flap Rule in Scalp Reconstruction

Background Defects of the scalp are surgically challenging for several reasons: anatomical convexity limits tissue displacement, resistance to advancement is different at different points on the scalp, and there is also interindividual variation. For many patients, the idea of undergoing an advanced...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shash, Hani, Marzouq, Sawsan, Alghamdi, Abdulrahman, Alrayes, Majd, Alkhaldi, Saud K, Shash, Hayam, Abu Quren, Ahmed M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36994305
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35301
Descripción
Sumario:Background Defects of the scalp are surgically challenging for several reasons: anatomical convexity limits tissue displacement, resistance to advancement is different at different points on the scalp, and there is also interindividual variation. For many patients, the idea of undergoing an advanced surgery such as a free flap is not preferred. Hence, a simple technique with a favorable outcome is needed. We hereby introduce our new technique: the 1-2-3 scalp advancement rule. Objectives The objective of this study is to discover a novel way to reconstruct scalp defects secondary to trauma or cancer, without having the patient undergo a big procedure. Material and Methods A total of nine cadaveric heads were used to test the idea of achieving greater advancement and increased scalp mobility to cover a 4×8 cm-sized defect using our proposed 1-2-3 scalp rule. Three steps performed were advancement flap, galeal scoring, and removal of the outer table of the skull. The measurement of advancement was recorded after each step, and the results were analyzed. Results The mobility of the scalp was calculated from the sagittal midline with identical arcs of rotation. With zero tension, we found that the total distance of advancement with a flap had a mean of 9.78 mm, while the advancement for the same flap after galeal scoring had a mean of 20.5 mm, and after removing the outer table, the mean advancement was 30.2 mm. Conclusion To create a tension-free closure necessary for optimal outcome for scalp defects, our study showed that increased distances were possible using galeal scoring and outer table removal, increasing the distance of advancement by 10.63 mm and 20.42 mm, respectively.