Cargando…
Navigating biosafety concerns within COVID-19 do-it-yourself (DIY) science: an ethnographic and interview study
Non-establishment or do-it-yourself (DIY) science involves individuals who may not have formal training conducting experiments outside of institutional settings. While prior scholarship has examined the motivations and values of those involved in the subset of DIY science known as “DIY biology,” lit...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Palgrave Macmillan UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41292-023-00301-2 |
_version_ | 1784912978865291264 |
---|---|
author | Wexler, Anna Choi, Rebekah Pearlman, Alex Rasmussen, Lisa M. |
author_facet | Wexler, Anna Choi, Rebekah Pearlman, Alex Rasmussen, Lisa M. |
author_sort | Wexler, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Non-establishment or do-it-yourself (DIY) science involves individuals who may not have formal training conducting experiments outside of institutional settings. While prior scholarship has examined the motivations and values of those involved in the subset of DIY science known as “DIY biology,” little research has addressed how these individuals navigate ethical issues in practice. The present study therefore aimed to understand how DIY biologists identify, approach, and resolve one particular ethical issue—biosafety—in their work. We conducted a digital ethnography of Just One Giant Lab (JOGL), the primary hub for DIY biology during the COVID-19 pandemic, and subsequently conducted interviews with individuals involved with JOGL. We found that JOGL was the first global DIY biology initiative to create a Biosafety Advisory Board and develop formal biosafety guidelines that applied to different groups in multiple locations. There was disagreement, however, regarding whether the Board should have an advisory role or provide mandatory oversight. We found that JOGL practiced ethical gatekeeping of projects that fell outside the limits defined by the Board. Our findings show that the DIY biology community recognized biosafety issues and tried to build infrastructure to facilitate the safe conduct of research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s41292-023-00301-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10042665 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Palgrave Macmillan UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100426652023-03-28 Navigating biosafety concerns within COVID-19 do-it-yourself (DIY) science: an ethnographic and interview study Wexler, Anna Choi, Rebekah Pearlman, Alex Rasmussen, Lisa M. Biosocieties Original Article Non-establishment or do-it-yourself (DIY) science involves individuals who may not have formal training conducting experiments outside of institutional settings. While prior scholarship has examined the motivations and values of those involved in the subset of DIY science known as “DIY biology,” little research has addressed how these individuals navigate ethical issues in practice. The present study therefore aimed to understand how DIY biologists identify, approach, and resolve one particular ethical issue—biosafety—in their work. We conducted a digital ethnography of Just One Giant Lab (JOGL), the primary hub for DIY biology during the COVID-19 pandemic, and subsequently conducted interviews with individuals involved with JOGL. We found that JOGL was the first global DIY biology initiative to create a Biosafety Advisory Board and develop formal biosafety guidelines that applied to different groups in multiple locations. There was disagreement, however, regarding whether the Board should have an advisory role or provide mandatory oversight. We found that JOGL practiced ethical gatekeeping of projects that fell outside the limits defined by the Board. Our findings show that the DIY biology community recognized biosafety issues and tried to build infrastructure to facilitate the safe conduct of research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s41292-023-00301-2. Palgrave Macmillan UK 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10042665/ /pubmed/37359139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41292-023-00301-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wexler, Anna Choi, Rebekah Pearlman, Alex Rasmussen, Lisa M. Navigating biosafety concerns within COVID-19 do-it-yourself (DIY) science: an ethnographic and interview study |
title | Navigating biosafety concerns within COVID-19 do-it-yourself (DIY) science: an ethnographic and interview study |
title_full | Navigating biosafety concerns within COVID-19 do-it-yourself (DIY) science: an ethnographic and interview study |
title_fullStr | Navigating biosafety concerns within COVID-19 do-it-yourself (DIY) science: an ethnographic and interview study |
title_full_unstemmed | Navigating biosafety concerns within COVID-19 do-it-yourself (DIY) science: an ethnographic and interview study |
title_short | Navigating biosafety concerns within COVID-19 do-it-yourself (DIY) science: an ethnographic and interview study |
title_sort | navigating biosafety concerns within covid-19 do-it-yourself (diy) science: an ethnographic and interview study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41292-023-00301-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wexleranna navigatingbiosafetyconcernswithincovid19doityourselfdiyscienceanethnographicandinterviewstudy AT choirebekah navigatingbiosafetyconcernswithincovid19doityourselfdiyscienceanethnographicandinterviewstudy AT pearlmanalex navigatingbiosafetyconcernswithincovid19doityourselfdiyscienceanethnographicandinterviewstudy AT rasmussenlisam navigatingbiosafetyconcernswithincovid19doityourselfdiyscienceanethnographicandinterviewstudy |