Cargando…

Optic nerve injury models under varying forces

PURPOSE: To explore the pathological changes in optic nerve injury models under varying forces. METHODS: The rats were classified into 4 groups: sham operation (SH), 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 N. Modeling was performed using the lateral optic nerve pulling method. Seven days after modeling, Brn3a immunofluor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Wu, Chao, Guojun, Shang, Mengqiu, Wu, Qiong, Xia, Yanting, Wei, Qiping, Zhou, Jian, Liao, Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36038691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02476-2
_version_ 1784913002338713600
author Sun, Wu
Chao, Guojun
Shang, Mengqiu
Wu, Qiong
Xia, Yanting
Wei, Qiping
Zhou, Jian
Liao, Liang
author_facet Sun, Wu
Chao, Guojun
Shang, Mengqiu
Wu, Qiong
Xia, Yanting
Wei, Qiping
Zhou, Jian
Liao, Liang
author_sort Sun, Wu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To explore the pathological changes in optic nerve injury models under varying forces. METHODS: The rats were classified into 4 groups: sham operation (SH), 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 N. Modeling was performed using the lateral optic nerve pulling method. Seven days after modeling, Brn3a immunofluorescence was used to detect retinal ganglion cell (RGC) number, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining was used to detect RGC apoptosis, and flash visual evoked potential (FVEP) was used to detect the optic nerve function on days 1, 3, and 7 after modeling. In addition, LC3 II and P62 expression levels in retinal tissues were detected by western blotting to observe the changes in autophagy levels. RESULTS: RGC number decreased 7 d after modeling, and it showed a downward trend with increasing damaging force. The number of apoptotic RGCs in ganglion cell layer in the 0.3 and 0.5 N groups was increased and was higher than that in the 0.1 N group. The difference in FVEP of rats in each group was mainly reflected in the P2 peak latency. LC3 II and P62 expression levels in retinal tissue of 0.3 and 0.5 N groups were higher than those of the SH and 0.1 groups; however, the difference between the 0.1 N and SH groups was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Precisely controlling the force of the optic nerve clamping injury model is necessary because different forces acting on the optic nerve will lead to differences in the loss of optic neurons, the conduction function of the optic nerve, and autophagy level in retinal tissues. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-022-02476-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10042766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100427662023-03-29 Optic nerve injury models under varying forces Sun, Wu Chao, Guojun Shang, Mengqiu Wu, Qiong Xia, Yanting Wei, Qiping Zhou, Jian Liao, Liang Int Ophthalmol Original Paper PURPOSE: To explore the pathological changes in optic nerve injury models under varying forces. METHODS: The rats were classified into 4 groups: sham operation (SH), 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 N. Modeling was performed using the lateral optic nerve pulling method. Seven days after modeling, Brn3a immunofluorescence was used to detect retinal ganglion cell (RGC) number, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining was used to detect RGC apoptosis, and flash visual evoked potential (FVEP) was used to detect the optic nerve function on days 1, 3, and 7 after modeling. In addition, LC3 II and P62 expression levels in retinal tissues were detected by western blotting to observe the changes in autophagy levels. RESULTS: RGC number decreased 7 d after modeling, and it showed a downward trend with increasing damaging force. The number of apoptotic RGCs in ganglion cell layer in the 0.3 and 0.5 N groups was increased and was higher than that in the 0.1 N group. The difference in FVEP of rats in each group was mainly reflected in the P2 peak latency. LC3 II and P62 expression levels in retinal tissue of 0.3 and 0.5 N groups were higher than those of the SH and 0.1 groups; however, the difference between the 0.1 N and SH groups was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Precisely controlling the force of the optic nerve clamping injury model is necessary because different forces acting on the optic nerve will lead to differences in the loss of optic neurons, the conduction function of the optic nerve, and autophagy level in retinal tissues. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-022-02476-2. Springer Netherlands 2022-08-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10042766/ /pubmed/36038691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02476-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Sun, Wu
Chao, Guojun
Shang, Mengqiu
Wu, Qiong
Xia, Yanting
Wei, Qiping
Zhou, Jian
Liao, Liang
Optic nerve injury models under varying forces
title Optic nerve injury models under varying forces
title_full Optic nerve injury models under varying forces
title_fullStr Optic nerve injury models under varying forces
title_full_unstemmed Optic nerve injury models under varying forces
title_short Optic nerve injury models under varying forces
title_sort optic nerve injury models under varying forces
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36038691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02476-2
work_keys_str_mv AT sunwu opticnerveinjurymodelsundervaryingforces
AT chaoguojun opticnerveinjurymodelsundervaryingforces
AT shangmengqiu opticnerveinjurymodelsundervaryingforces
AT wuqiong opticnerveinjurymodelsundervaryingforces
AT xiayanting opticnerveinjurymodelsundervaryingforces
AT weiqiping opticnerveinjurymodelsundervaryingforces
AT zhoujian opticnerveinjurymodelsundervaryingforces
AT liaoliang opticnerveinjurymodelsundervaryingforces