Cargando…

Importance of ipsilateral residual hearing for spatial hearing by bimodal cochlear implant users

Bimodal cochlear implant (CI) listeners have difficulty utilizing spatial cues to segregate competing speech, possibly due to tonotopic mismatch between the acoustic input frequency and electrode place of stimulation. The present study investigated the effects of tonotopic mismatch in the context of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Mathew, Galvin, John J., Fu, Qian-Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36973380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32135-0
_version_ 1784913021182672896
author Thomas, Mathew
Galvin, John J.
Fu, Qian-Jie
author_facet Thomas, Mathew
Galvin, John J.
Fu, Qian-Jie
author_sort Thomas, Mathew
collection PubMed
description Bimodal cochlear implant (CI) listeners have difficulty utilizing spatial cues to segregate competing speech, possibly due to tonotopic mismatch between the acoustic input frequency and electrode place of stimulation. The present study investigated the effects of tonotopic mismatch in the context of residual acoustic hearing in the non-CI ear or residual hearing in both ears. Speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) were measured with two co-located or spatially separated speech maskers in normal-hearing adults listening to acoustic simulations of CIs; low frequency acoustic information was available in the non-CI ear (bimodal listening) or in both ears. Bimodal SRTs were significantly better with tonotopically matched than mismatched electric hearing for both co-located and spatially separated speech maskers. When there was no tonotopic mismatch, residual acoustic hearing in both ears provided a significant benefit when maskers were spatially separated, but not when co-located. The simulation data suggest that hearing preservation in the implanted ear for bimodal CI listeners may significantly benefit utilization of spatial cues to segregate competing speech, especially when the residual acoustic hearing is comparable across two ears. Also, the benefits of bilateral residual acoustic hearing may be best ascertained for spatially separated maskers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10042848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100428482023-03-29 Importance of ipsilateral residual hearing for spatial hearing by bimodal cochlear implant users Thomas, Mathew Galvin, John J. Fu, Qian-Jie Sci Rep Article Bimodal cochlear implant (CI) listeners have difficulty utilizing spatial cues to segregate competing speech, possibly due to tonotopic mismatch between the acoustic input frequency and electrode place of stimulation. The present study investigated the effects of tonotopic mismatch in the context of residual acoustic hearing in the non-CI ear or residual hearing in both ears. Speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) were measured with two co-located or spatially separated speech maskers in normal-hearing adults listening to acoustic simulations of CIs; low frequency acoustic information was available in the non-CI ear (bimodal listening) or in both ears. Bimodal SRTs were significantly better with tonotopically matched than mismatched electric hearing for both co-located and spatially separated speech maskers. When there was no tonotopic mismatch, residual acoustic hearing in both ears provided a significant benefit when maskers were spatially separated, but not when co-located. The simulation data suggest that hearing preservation in the implanted ear for bimodal CI listeners may significantly benefit utilization of spatial cues to segregate competing speech, especially when the residual acoustic hearing is comparable across two ears. Also, the benefits of bilateral residual acoustic hearing may be best ascertained for spatially separated maskers. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10042848/ /pubmed/36973380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32135-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Thomas, Mathew
Galvin, John J.
Fu, Qian-Jie
Importance of ipsilateral residual hearing for spatial hearing by bimodal cochlear implant users
title Importance of ipsilateral residual hearing for spatial hearing by bimodal cochlear implant users
title_full Importance of ipsilateral residual hearing for spatial hearing by bimodal cochlear implant users
title_fullStr Importance of ipsilateral residual hearing for spatial hearing by bimodal cochlear implant users
title_full_unstemmed Importance of ipsilateral residual hearing for spatial hearing by bimodal cochlear implant users
title_short Importance of ipsilateral residual hearing for spatial hearing by bimodal cochlear implant users
title_sort importance of ipsilateral residual hearing for spatial hearing by bimodal cochlear implant users
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36973380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32135-0
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasmathew importanceofipsilateralresidualhearingforspatialhearingbybimodalcochlearimplantusers
AT galvinjohnj importanceofipsilateralresidualhearingforspatialhearingbybimodalcochlearimplantusers
AT fuqianjie importanceofipsilateralresidualhearingforspatialhearingbybimodalcochlearimplantusers