Cargando…
Making Use of Existing International Legal Mechanisms to Manage the Global Antimicrobial Commons: Identifying Legal Hooks and Institutional Mandates
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an urgent threat to global public health and development. Mitigating this threat requires substantial short-term action on key AMR priorities. While international legal agreements are the strongest mechanism for ensuring collaboration among countries, negotiating ne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32236833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10728-020-00393-y |
_version_ | 1784913031652704256 |
---|---|
author | Rogers Van Katwyk, Susan Weldon, Isaac Giubilini, Alberto Kirchhelle, Claas Harrison, Mark McLean, Angela Savulescu, Julian Hoffman, Steven J. |
author_facet | Rogers Van Katwyk, Susan Weldon, Isaac Giubilini, Alberto Kirchhelle, Claas Harrison, Mark McLean, Angela Savulescu, Julian Hoffman, Steven J. |
author_sort | Rogers Van Katwyk, Susan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an urgent threat to global public health and development. Mitigating this threat requires substantial short-term action on key AMR priorities. While international legal agreements are the strongest mechanism for ensuring collaboration among countries, negotiating new international agreements can be a slow process. In the second article in this special issue, we consider whether harnessing existing international legal agreements offers an opportunity to increase collective action on AMR goals in the short-term. We highlight ten AMR priorities and several strategies for achieving these goals using existing “legal hooks” that draw on elements of international environmental, trade and health laws governing related matters that could be used as they exist or revised to include AMR. We also consider the institutional mandates of international authorities to highlight areas where additional steps could be taken on AMR without constitutional changes. Overall, we identify 37 possible mechanisms to strengthen AMR governance using the International Health Regulations, the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, the International Convention on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System, and the Basel, Rotterdam, and Stockholm conventions. Although we identify many shorter-term opportunities for addressing AMR using existing legal hooks, none of these options are capable of comprehensively addressing all global governance challenges related to AMR, such that they should be pursued simultaneously with longer-term approaches including a dedicated international legal agreement on AMR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10042894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100428942023-03-29 Making Use of Existing International Legal Mechanisms to Manage the Global Antimicrobial Commons: Identifying Legal Hooks and Institutional Mandates Rogers Van Katwyk, Susan Weldon, Isaac Giubilini, Alberto Kirchhelle, Claas Harrison, Mark McLean, Angela Savulescu, Julian Hoffman, Steven J. Health Care Anal Original Article Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an urgent threat to global public health and development. Mitigating this threat requires substantial short-term action on key AMR priorities. While international legal agreements are the strongest mechanism for ensuring collaboration among countries, negotiating new international agreements can be a slow process. In the second article in this special issue, we consider whether harnessing existing international legal agreements offers an opportunity to increase collective action on AMR goals in the short-term. We highlight ten AMR priorities and several strategies for achieving these goals using existing “legal hooks” that draw on elements of international environmental, trade and health laws governing related matters that could be used as they exist or revised to include AMR. We also consider the institutional mandates of international authorities to highlight areas where additional steps could be taken on AMR without constitutional changes. Overall, we identify 37 possible mechanisms to strengthen AMR governance using the International Health Regulations, the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, the International Convention on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System, and the Basel, Rotterdam, and Stockholm conventions. Although we identify many shorter-term opportunities for addressing AMR using existing legal hooks, none of these options are capable of comprehensively addressing all global governance challenges related to AMR, such that they should be pursued simultaneously with longer-term approaches including a dedicated international legal agreement on AMR. Springer US 2020-03-31 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10042894/ /pubmed/32236833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10728-020-00393-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rogers Van Katwyk, Susan Weldon, Isaac Giubilini, Alberto Kirchhelle, Claas Harrison, Mark McLean, Angela Savulescu, Julian Hoffman, Steven J. Making Use of Existing International Legal Mechanisms to Manage the Global Antimicrobial Commons: Identifying Legal Hooks and Institutional Mandates |
title | Making Use of Existing International Legal Mechanisms to Manage the Global Antimicrobial Commons: Identifying Legal Hooks and Institutional Mandates |
title_full | Making Use of Existing International Legal Mechanisms to Manage the Global Antimicrobial Commons: Identifying Legal Hooks and Institutional Mandates |
title_fullStr | Making Use of Existing International Legal Mechanisms to Manage the Global Antimicrobial Commons: Identifying Legal Hooks and Institutional Mandates |
title_full_unstemmed | Making Use of Existing International Legal Mechanisms to Manage the Global Antimicrobial Commons: Identifying Legal Hooks and Institutional Mandates |
title_short | Making Use of Existing International Legal Mechanisms to Manage the Global Antimicrobial Commons: Identifying Legal Hooks and Institutional Mandates |
title_sort | making use of existing international legal mechanisms to manage the global antimicrobial commons: identifying legal hooks and institutional mandates |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32236833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10728-020-00393-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rogersvankatwyksusan makinguseofexistinginternationallegalmechanismstomanagetheglobalantimicrobialcommonsidentifyinglegalhooksandinstitutionalmandates AT weldonisaac makinguseofexistinginternationallegalmechanismstomanagetheglobalantimicrobialcommonsidentifyinglegalhooksandinstitutionalmandates AT giubilinialberto makinguseofexistinginternationallegalmechanismstomanagetheglobalantimicrobialcommonsidentifyinglegalhooksandinstitutionalmandates AT kirchhelleclaas makinguseofexistinginternationallegalmechanismstomanagetheglobalantimicrobialcommonsidentifyinglegalhooksandinstitutionalmandates AT harrisonmark makinguseofexistinginternationallegalmechanismstomanagetheglobalantimicrobialcommonsidentifyinglegalhooksandinstitutionalmandates AT mcleanangela makinguseofexistinginternationallegalmechanismstomanagetheglobalantimicrobialcommonsidentifyinglegalhooksandinstitutionalmandates AT savulescujulian makinguseofexistinginternationallegalmechanismstomanagetheglobalantimicrobialcommonsidentifyinglegalhooksandinstitutionalmandates AT hoffmanstevenj makinguseofexistinginternationallegalmechanismstomanagetheglobalantimicrobialcommonsidentifyinglegalhooksandinstitutionalmandates |