Cargando…

Green function estimates on complements of low-dimensional uniformly rectifiable sets

It has been recently established in David and Mayboroda (Approximation of green functions and domains with uniformly rectifiable boundaries of all dimensions. arXiv:2010.09793) that on uniformly rectifiable sets the Green function is almost affine in the weak sense, and moreover, in some scenarios s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: David, Guy, Feneuil, Joseph, Mayboroda, Svitlana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37006406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00208-022-02379-8
Descripción
Sumario:It has been recently established in David and Mayboroda (Approximation of green functions and domains with uniformly rectifiable boundaries of all dimensions. arXiv:2010.09793) that on uniformly rectifiable sets the Green function is almost affine in the weak sense, and moreover, in some scenarios such Green function estimates are equivalent to the uniform rectifiability of a set. The present paper tackles a strong analogue of these results, starting with the “flagship" degenerate operators on sets with lower dimensional boundaries. We consider the elliptic operators [Formula: see text] associated to a domain [Formula: see text] with a uniformly rectifiable boundary [Formula: see text] of dimension [Formula: see text] , the now usual distance to the boundary [Formula: see text] given by [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text] , where [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] . In this paper we show that the Green function G for [Formula: see text] , with pole at infinity, is well approximated by multiples of [Formula: see text] , in the sense that the function [Formula: see text] satisfies a Carleson measure estimate on [Formula: see text] . We underline that the strong and the weak results are different in nature and, of course, at the level of the proofs: the latter extensively used compactness arguments, while the present paper relies on some intricate integration by parts and the properties of the “magical" distance function from David et al. (Duke Math J, to appear).