Cargando…

Assessing What Matters to People Affected by Alzheimer’s Disease: A Quantitative Analysis

INTRODUCTION: In this phase of the ongoing What Matters Most study series, designed to evaluate concepts that are meaningful to people affected by Alzheimer’s disease (AD), we quantified the importance of symptoms, impacts, and outcomes of AD to people at risk for or with AD and care partners of peo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hauber, Brett, Paulsen, Russ, Krasa, Holly B., Vradenburg, George, Comer, Meryl, Callahan, Leigh F., Winfield, John, Potashman, Michele, Hartry, Ann, Lee, Daniel, Wilson, Hilary, Hoffman, Deborah L., Wieberg, Dan, Kremer, Ian N., Taylor, Geraldine A., Taylor, James M., Lappin, Debra, Martin, Allison D., Frangiosa, Terry, Biggar, Virginia, Slota, Christina, Romano, Carla, DiBenedetti, Dana B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36763306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-023-00445-0
_version_ 1784913078406610944
author Hauber, Brett
Paulsen, Russ
Krasa, Holly B.
Vradenburg, George
Comer, Meryl
Callahan, Leigh F.
Winfield, John
Potashman, Michele
Hartry, Ann
Lee, Daniel
Wilson, Hilary
Hoffman, Deborah L.
Wieberg, Dan
Kremer, Ian N.
Taylor, Geraldine A.
Taylor, James M.
Lappin, Debra
Martin, Allison D.
Frangiosa, Terry
Biggar, Virginia
Slota, Christina
Romano, Carla
DiBenedetti, Dana B.
author_facet Hauber, Brett
Paulsen, Russ
Krasa, Holly B.
Vradenburg, George
Comer, Meryl
Callahan, Leigh F.
Winfield, John
Potashman, Michele
Hartry, Ann
Lee, Daniel
Wilson, Hilary
Hoffman, Deborah L.
Wieberg, Dan
Kremer, Ian N.
Taylor, Geraldine A.
Taylor, James M.
Lappin, Debra
Martin, Allison D.
Frangiosa, Terry
Biggar, Virginia
Slota, Christina
Romano, Carla
DiBenedetti, Dana B.
author_sort Hauber, Brett
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In this phase of the ongoing What Matters Most study series, designed to evaluate concepts that are meaningful to people affected by Alzheimer’s disease (AD), we quantified the importance of symptoms, impacts, and outcomes of AD to people at risk for or with AD and care partners of people with AD. METHODS: We administered a web-based survey to individuals at risk for or with AD (Group 1: unimpaired cognition with evidence of AD pathology; Group 2: AD risk factors and subjective cognitive complaints/mild cognitive impairment; Group 3: mild AD) and to care partners of individuals with moderate AD (Group 4) or severe AD (Group 5). Respondents rated the importance of 42 symptoms, impacts, and outcomes on a scale ranging from 1 (“not at all important”) to 5 (“extremely important”). RESULTS: Among the 274 respondents (70.4% female; 63.1% white), over half of patient respondents rated all 42 items as “very important” or “extremely important,” while care partners rated fewer items as “very important” or “extremely important.” Among the three patient groups, the minimum (maximum) mean importance rating for any item was 3.4 (4.6), indicating that all items were at least moderately to very important. Among care partners of people with moderate or severe AD, the minimum (maximum) mean importance rating was 2.1 (4.4), indicating that most items were rated as at least moderately important. Overall, taking medications correctly, not feeling down or depressed, and staying safe had the highest importance ratings among both patients and care partners, regardless of AD phase. CONCLUSION: Concepts of importance to individuals affected by AD go beyond the common understanding of “cognition” or “function” alone, reflecting a desire to maintain independence, overall physical and mental health, emotional well-being, and safety. Preservation of these attributes may be key to understanding whether interventions deliver clinically meaningful outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-023-00445-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10043143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100431432023-03-29 Assessing What Matters to People Affected by Alzheimer’s Disease: A Quantitative Analysis Hauber, Brett Paulsen, Russ Krasa, Holly B. Vradenburg, George Comer, Meryl Callahan, Leigh F. Winfield, John Potashman, Michele Hartry, Ann Lee, Daniel Wilson, Hilary Hoffman, Deborah L. Wieberg, Dan Kremer, Ian N. Taylor, Geraldine A. Taylor, James M. Lappin, Debra Martin, Allison D. Frangiosa, Terry Biggar, Virginia Slota, Christina Romano, Carla DiBenedetti, Dana B. Neurol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: In this phase of the ongoing What Matters Most study series, designed to evaluate concepts that are meaningful to people affected by Alzheimer’s disease (AD), we quantified the importance of symptoms, impacts, and outcomes of AD to people at risk for or with AD and care partners of people with AD. METHODS: We administered a web-based survey to individuals at risk for or with AD (Group 1: unimpaired cognition with evidence of AD pathology; Group 2: AD risk factors and subjective cognitive complaints/mild cognitive impairment; Group 3: mild AD) and to care partners of individuals with moderate AD (Group 4) or severe AD (Group 5). Respondents rated the importance of 42 symptoms, impacts, and outcomes on a scale ranging from 1 (“not at all important”) to 5 (“extremely important”). RESULTS: Among the 274 respondents (70.4% female; 63.1% white), over half of patient respondents rated all 42 items as “very important” or “extremely important,” while care partners rated fewer items as “very important” or “extremely important.” Among the three patient groups, the minimum (maximum) mean importance rating for any item was 3.4 (4.6), indicating that all items were at least moderately to very important. Among care partners of people with moderate or severe AD, the minimum (maximum) mean importance rating was 2.1 (4.4), indicating that most items were rated as at least moderately important. Overall, taking medications correctly, not feeling down or depressed, and staying safe had the highest importance ratings among both patients and care partners, regardless of AD phase. CONCLUSION: Concepts of importance to individuals affected by AD go beyond the common understanding of “cognition” or “function” alone, reflecting a desire to maintain independence, overall physical and mental health, emotional well-being, and safety. Preservation of these attributes may be key to understanding whether interventions deliver clinically meaningful outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-023-00445-0. Springer Healthcare 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10043143/ /pubmed/36763306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-023-00445-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Hauber, Brett
Paulsen, Russ
Krasa, Holly B.
Vradenburg, George
Comer, Meryl
Callahan, Leigh F.
Winfield, John
Potashman, Michele
Hartry, Ann
Lee, Daniel
Wilson, Hilary
Hoffman, Deborah L.
Wieberg, Dan
Kremer, Ian N.
Taylor, Geraldine A.
Taylor, James M.
Lappin, Debra
Martin, Allison D.
Frangiosa, Terry
Biggar, Virginia
Slota, Christina
Romano, Carla
DiBenedetti, Dana B.
Assessing What Matters to People Affected by Alzheimer’s Disease: A Quantitative Analysis
title Assessing What Matters to People Affected by Alzheimer’s Disease: A Quantitative Analysis
title_full Assessing What Matters to People Affected by Alzheimer’s Disease: A Quantitative Analysis
title_fullStr Assessing What Matters to People Affected by Alzheimer’s Disease: A Quantitative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Assessing What Matters to People Affected by Alzheimer’s Disease: A Quantitative Analysis
title_short Assessing What Matters to People Affected by Alzheimer’s Disease: A Quantitative Analysis
title_sort assessing what matters to people affected by alzheimer’s disease: a quantitative analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36763306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-023-00445-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hauberbrett assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT paulsenruss assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT krasahollyb assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT vradenburggeorge assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT comermeryl assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT callahanleighf assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT winfieldjohn assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT potashmanmichele assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT hartryann assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT leedaniel assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT wilsonhilary assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT hoffmandeborahl assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT wiebergdan assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT kremeriann assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT taylorgeraldinea assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT taylorjamesm assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT lappindebra assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT martinallisond assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT frangiosaterry assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT biggarvirginia assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT slotachristina assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT romanocarla assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis
AT dibenedettidanab assessingwhatmatterstopeopleaffectedbyalzheimersdiseaseaquantitativeanalysis