Cargando…

Prediction of in-hospital adverse clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism, machine learning based models

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular events. The conventional modeling methods and severity risk scores lack multiple laboratories, paraclinical and imaging data. Data science and machine learning (ML) based prediction models may help better predict...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jenab, Yaser, Hosseini, Kaveh, Esmaeili, Zahra, Tofighi, Saeed, Ariannejad, Hamid, Sotoudeh, Houman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998977
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1087702
_version_ 1784913084206284800
author Jenab, Yaser
Hosseini, Kaveh
Esmaeili, Zahra
Tofighi, Saeed
Ariannejad, Hamid
Sotoudeh, Houman
author_facet Jenab, Yaser
Hosseini, Kaveh
Esmaeili, Zahra
Tofighi, Saeed
Ariannejad, Hamid
Sotoudeh, Houman
author_sort Jenab, Yaser
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular events. The conventional modeling methods and severity risk scores lack multiple laboratories, paraclinical and imaging data. Data science and machine learning (ML) based prediction models may help better predict outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective registry-based design, all consecutive hospitalized patients diagnosed with pulmonary thromboembolism (based on pulmonary CT angiography) from 2011 to 2019 were recruited. ML based algorithms [Gradient Boosting (GB) and Deep Learning (DL)] were applied and compared with logistic regression (LR) to predict hemodynamic instability and/or all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total number of 1,017 patients were finally enrolled in the study, including 465 women and 552 men. Overall incidence of study main endpoint was 9.6%, (7.2% in men and 12.4% in women; p-value = 0.05). The overall performance of the GB model is better than the other two models (AUC: 0.94 for GB vs. 0.88 and 0.90 for DL and LR models respectively). Based on GB model, lower O(2) saturation and right ventricle dilation and dysfunction were among the strongest adverse event predictors. CONCLUSION: ML-based models have notable prediction ability in PE patients. These algorithms may help physicians to detect high-risk patients earlier and take appropriate preventive measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10043172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100431722023-03-29 Prediction of in-hospital adverse clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism, machine learning based models Jenab, Yaser Hosseini, Kaveh Esmaeili, Zahra Tofighi, Saeed Ariannejad, Hamid Sotoudeh, Houman Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular events. The conventional modeling methods and severity risk scores lack multiple laboratories, paraclinical and imaging data. Data science and machine learning (ML) based prediction models may help better predict outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective registry-based design, all consecutive hospitalized patients diagnosed with pulmonary thromboembolism (based on pulmonary CT angiography) from 2011 to 2019 were recruited. ML based algorithms [Gradient Boosting (GB) and Deep Learning (DL)] were applied and compared with logistic regression (LR) to predict hemodynamic instability and/or all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total number of 1,017 patients were finally enrolled in the study, including 465 women and 552 men. Overall incidence of study main endpoint was 9.6%, (7.2% in men and 12.4% in women; p-value = 0.05). The overall performance of the GB model is better than the other two models (AUC: 0.94 for GB vs. 0.88 and 0.90 for DL and LR models respectively). Based on GB model, lower O(2) saturation and right ventricle dilation and dysfunction were among the strongest adverse event predictors. CONCLUSION: ML-based models have notable prediction ability in PE patients. These algorithms may help physicians to detect high-risk patients earlier and take appropriate preventive measures. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10043172/ /pubmed/36998977 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1087702 Text en © 2023 Jenab, Hosseini, Esmaeili, Tofighi, Ariannejad and Sotoudeh. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Jenab, Yaser
Hosseini, Kaveh
Esmaeili, Zahra
Tofighi, Saeed
Ariannejad, Hamid
Sotoudeh, Houman
Prediction of in-hospital adverse clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism, machine learning based models
title Prediction of in-hospital adverse clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism, machine learning based models
title_full Prediction of in-hospital adverse clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism, machine learning based models
title_fullStr Prediction of in-hospital adverse clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism, machine learning based models
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of in-hospital adverse clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism, machine learning based models
title_short Prediction of in-hospital adverse clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism, machine learning based models
title_sort prediction of in-hospital adverse clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism, machine learning based models
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998977
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1087702
work_keys_str_mv AT jenabyaser predictionofinhospitaladverseclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithpulmonarythromboembolismmachinelearningbasedmodels
AT hosseinikaveh predictionofinhospitaladverseclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithpulmonarythromboembolismmachinelearningbasedmodels
AT esmaeilizahra predictionofinhospitaladverseclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithpulmonarythromboembolismmachinelearningbasedmodels
AT tofighisaeed predictionofinhospitaladverseclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithpulmonarythromboembolismmachinelearningbasedmodels
AT ariannejadhamid predictionofinhospitaladverseclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithpulmonarythromboembolismmachinelearningbasedmodels
AT sotoudehhouman predictionofinhospitaladverseclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithpulmonarythromboembolismmachinelearningbasedmodels