Cargando…

How often is occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke causal vs. incidental? A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Long-term cardiac monitoring studies have unveiled low-burden, occult atrial fibrillation (AF) in some patients with otherwise cryptogenic stroke (CS), but occult AF is also found in some individuals without a stroke history and in patients with stroke of a known cause (KS). Clinical m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaisinanunkul, Napasri, Khurshid, Shaan, Buck, Brian H., Rabinstein, Alejandro A., Anderson, Christopher D., Hill, Michael D., Fugate, Jennifer E., Saver, Jeffrey L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1103664
_version_ 1784913091475013632
author Chaisinanunkul, Napasri
Khurshid, Shaan
Buck, Brian H.
Rabinstein, Alejandro A.
Anderson, Christopher D.
Hill, Michael D.
Fugate, Jennifer E.
Saver, Jeffrey L.
author_facet Chaisinanunkul, Napasri
Khurshid, Shaan
Buck, Brian H.
Rabinstein, Alejandro A.
Anderson, Christopher D.
Hill, Michael D.
Fugate, Jennifer E.
Saver, Jeffrey L.
author_sort Chaisinanunkul, Napasri
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Long-term cardiac monitoring studies have unveiled low-burden, occult atrial fibrillation (AF) in some patients with otherwise cryptogenic stroke (CS), but occult AF is also found in some individuals without a stroke history and in patients with stroke of a known cause (KS). Clinical management would be aided by estimates of how often occult AF in a patient with CS is causal vs. incidental. METHODS: Through a systematic search, we identified all case–control and cohort studies applying identical long-term monitoring techniques to both patients with CS and KS. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis across these studies to determine the best estimate of the differential frequency of occult AF in CS and KS among all patients and across age subgroups. We then applied Bayes' theorem to determine the probability that occult AF is causal or incidental. RESULTS: The systematic search identified three case–control and cohort studies enrolling 560 patients (315 CS, 245 KS). Methods of long-term monitoring were implantable loop recorder in 31.0%, extended external monitoring in 67.9%, and both in 1.2%. Crude cumulative rates of AF detection were CS 47/315 (14.9%) vs. KS 23/246 (9.3%). In the formal meta-analysis, the summary odds ratio for occult AF in CS vs. KS in all patients was 1.80 (95% CI, 1.05–3.07), p = 0.03. With the application of Bayes' theorem, the corresponding probabilities indicated that, when present, occult AF in patients with CS is causal in 41.2% (95% CI, 15.5–77.7%) of patients. Analyses stratified by age suggested that detected occult AF in patients with CS was causal in 62.3% (95 CI, 0–87.1%) of patients under the age of 65 years and 28.5% (95 CI, 0–63.7%) of patients aged 65 years and older but estimates had limited precision. CONCLUSION: Current evidence is preliminary, but it indicates that in cryptogenic stroke when occult AF is found, it is causal in about 41.2% of patients. These findings suggest that anticoagulation therapy may be beneficial to prevent recurrent stroke in a substantial proportion of patients with CS found to have occult AF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10043201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100432012023-03-29 How often is occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke causal vs. incidental? A meta-analysis Chaisinanunkul, Napasri Khurshid, Shaan Buck, Brian H. Rabinstein, Alejandro A. Anderson, Christopher D. Hill, Michael D. Fugate, Jennifer E. Saver, Jeffrey L. Front Neurol Neurology INTRODUCTION: Long-term cardiac monitoring studies have unveiled low-burden, occult atrial fibrillation (AF) in some patients with otherwise cryptogenic stroke (CS), but occult AF is also found in some individuals without a stroke history and in patients with stroke of a known cause (KS). Clinical management would be aided by estimates of how often occult AF in a patient with CS is causal vs. incidental. METHODS: Through a systematic search, we identified all case–control and cohort studies applying identical long-term monitoring techniques to both patients with CS and KS. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis across these studies to determine the best estimate of the differential frequency of occult AF in CS and KS among all patients and across age subgroups. We then applied Bayes' theorem to determine the probability that occult AF is causal or incidental. RESULTS: The systematic search identified three case–control and cohort studies enrolling 560 patients (315 CS, 245 KS). Methods of long-term monitoring were implantable loop recorder in 31.0%, extended external monitoring in 67.9%, and both in 1.2%. Crude cumulative rates of AF detection were CS 47/315 (14.9%) vs. KS 23/246 (9.3%). In the formal meta-analysis, the summary odds ratio for occult AF in CS vs. KS in all patients was 1.80 (95% CI, 1.05–3.07), p = 0.03. With the application of Bayes' theorem, the corresponding probabilities indicated that, when present, occult AF in patients with CS is causal in 41.2% (95% CI, 15.5–77.7%) of patients. Analyses stratified by age suggested that detected occult AF in patients with CS was causal in 62.3% (95 CI, 0–87.1%) of patients under the age of 65 years and 28.5% (95 CI, 0–63.7%) of patients aged 65 years and older but estimates had limited precision. CONCLUSION: Current evidence is preliminary, but it indicates that in cryptogenic stroke when occult AF is found, it is causal in about 41.2% of patients. These findings suggest that anticoagulation therapy may be beneficial to prevent recurrent stroke in a substantial proportion of patients with CS found to have occult AF. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10043201/ /pubmed/36998779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1103664 Text en Copyright © 2023 Chaisinanunkul, Khurshid, Buck, Rabinstein, Anderson, Hill, Fugate and Saver. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Chaisinanunkul, Napasri
Khurshid, Shaan
Buck, Brian H.
Rabinstein, Alejandro A.
Anderson, Christopher D.
Hill, Michael D.
Fugate, Jennifer E.
Saver, Jeffrey L.
How often is occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke causal vs. incidental? A meta-analysis
title How often is occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke causal vs. incidental? A meta-analysis
title_full How often is occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke causal vs. incidental? A meta-analysis
title_fullStr How often is occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke causal vs. incidental? A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed How often is occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke causal vs. incidental? A meta-analysis
title_short How often is occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke causal vs. incidental? A meta-analysis
title_sort how often is occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke causal vs. incidental? a meta-analysis
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1103664
work_keys_str_mv AT chaisinanunkulnapasri howoftenisoccultatrialfibrillationincryptogenicstrokecausalvsincidentalametaanalysis
AT khurshidshaan howoftenisoccultatrialfibrillationincryptogenicstrokecausalvsincidentalametaanalysis
AT buckbrianh howoftenisoccultatrialfibrillationincryptogenicstrokecausalvsincidentalametaanalysis
AT rabinsteinalejandroa howoftenisoccultatrialfibrillationincryptogenicstrokecausalvsincidentalametaanalysis
AT andersonchristopherd howoftenisoccultatrialfibrillationincryptogenicstrokecausalvsincidentalametaanalysis
AT hillmichaeld howoftenisoccultatrialfibrillationincryptogenicstrokecausalvsincidentalametaanalysis
AT fugatejennifere howoftenisoccultatrialfibrillationincryptogenicstrokecausalvsincidentalametaanalysis
AT saverjeffreyl howoftenisoccultatrialfibrillationincryptogenicstrokecausalvsincidentalametaanalysis