Cargando…

Anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans using deep autoencoder networks

PURPOSE: Treatment plans are used for patients under radiotherapy in clinics. Before execution, these plans are checked for safety and quality by human experts. A few of them were identified with flaws and needed further improvement. To automate this checking process, an unsupervised learning method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Peng, Shang, Jiawen, Xu, Yingjie, Hu, Zhihui, Zhang, Ke, Dai, Jianrong, Yan, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1142947
_version_ 1784913103658418176
author Huang, Peng
Shang, Jiawen
Xu, Yingjie
Hu, Zhihui
Zhang, Ke
Dai, Jianrong
Yan, Hui
author_facet Huang, Peng
Shang, Jiawen
Xu, Yingjie
Hu, Zhihui
Zhang, Ke
Dai, Jianrong
Yan, Hui
author_sort Huang, Peng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Treatment plans are used for patients under radiotherapy in clinics. Before execution, these plans are checked for safety and quality by human experts. A few of them were identified with flaws and needed further improvement. To automate this checking process, an unsupervised learning method based on an autoencoder was proposed. METHODS: First, features were extracted from the treatment plan by human experts. Then, these features were assembled and used for model learning. After network optimization, a reconstruction error between the predicted and target signals was obtained. Finally, the questionable plans were identified based on the value of the reconstruction error. A large value of the reconstruction error indicates a longer distance from the standard distribution of normal plans. A total of 576 treatment plans for breast cancer patients were used for the test. Among them, 19 were questionable plans identified by human experts. To evaluate the performance of the autoencoder, it was compared with four baseline detection algorithms, namely, local outlier factor (LOF), hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (HDBSCAN), one-class support vector machine (OC-SVM), and principal component analysis (PCA). RESULTS: The results showed that the autoencoder achieved the best performance than the other four baseline algorithms. The AUC value of the autoencoder was 0.9985, while the second one was 0.9535 (LOF). While maintaining 100% recall, the average accuracy and precision of the results by the autoencoder were 0.9658 and 0.5143, respectively. While maintaining 100% recall, the average accuracy and precision of the results by LOF were 0.8090 and 0.1472, respectively. CONCLUSION: The autoencoder can effectively identify questionable plans from a large group of normal plans. There is no need to label the data and prepare the training data for model learning. The autoencoder provides an effective way to carry out an automatic plan checking in radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10043249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100432492023-03-29 Anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans using deep autoencoder networks Huang, Peng Shang, Jiawen Xu, Yingjie Hu, Zhihui Zhang, Ke Dai, Jianrong Yan, Hui Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: Treatment plans are used for patients under radiotherapy in clinics. Before execution, these plans are checked for safety and quality by human experts. A few of them were identified with flaws and needed further improvement. To automate this checking process, an unsupervised learning method based on an autoencoder was proposed. METHODS: First, features were extracted from the treatment plan by human experts. Then, these features were assembled and used for model learning. After network optimization, a reconstruction error between the predicted and target signals was obtained. Finally, the questionable plans were identified based on the value of the reconstruction error. A large value of the reconstruction error indicates a longer distance from the standard distribution of normal plans. A total of 576 treatment plans for breast cancer patients were used for the test. Among them, 19 were questionable plans identified by human experts. To evaluate the performance of the autoencoder, it was compared with four baseline detection algorithms, namely, local outlier factor (LOF), hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (HDBSCAN), one-class support vector machine (OC-SVM), and principal component analysis (PCA). RESULTS: The results showed that the autoencoder achieved the best performance than the other four baseline algorithms. The AUC value of the autoencoder was 0.9985, while the second one was 0.9535 (LOF). While maintaining 100% recall, the average accuracy and precision of the results by the autoencoder were 0.9658 and 0.5143, respectively. While maintaining 100% recall, the average accuracy and precision of the results by LOF were 0.8090 and 0.1472, respectively. CONCLUSION: The autoencoder can effectively identify questionable plans from a large group of normal plans. There is no need to label the data and prepare the training data for model learning. The autoencoder provides an effective way to carry out an automatic plan checking in radiotherapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10043249/ /pubmed/36998450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1142947 Text en Copyright © 2023 Huang, Shang, Xu, Hu, Zhang, Dai and Yan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Huang, Peng
Shang, Jiawen
Xu, Yingjie
Hu, Zhihui
Zhang, Ke
Dai, Jianrong
Yan, Hui
Anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans using deep autoencoder networks
title Anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans using deep autoencoder networks
title_full Anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans using deep autoencoder networks
title_fullStr Anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans using deep autoencoder networks
title_full_unstemmed Anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans using deep autoencoder networks
title_short Anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans using deep autoencoder networks
title_sort anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans using deep autoencoder networks
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1142947
work_keys_str_mv AT huangpeng anomalydetectioninradiotherapyplansusingdeepautoencodernetworks
AT shangjiawen anomalydetectioninradiotherapyplansusingdeepautoencodernetworks
AT xuyingjie anomalydetectioninradiotherapyplansusingdeepautoencodernetworks
AT huzhihui anomalydetectioninradiotherapyplansusingdeepautoencodernetworks
AT zhangke anomalydetectioninradiotherapyplansusingdeepautoencodernetworks
AT daijianrong anomalydetectioninradiotherapyplansusingdeepautoencodernetworks
AT yanhui anomalydetectioninradiotherapyplansusingdeepautoencodernetworks