Cargando…
A RUSBoosted tree method for k-complex detection using tunable Q-factor wavelet transform and multi-domain feature extraction
BACKGROUND: K-complex detection traditionally relied on expert clinicians, which is time-consuming and onerous. Various automatic k-complex detection-based machine learning methods are presented. However, these methods always suffered from imbalanced datasets, which impede the subsequent processing...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1108059 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: K-complex detection traditionally relied on expert clinicians, which is time-consuming and onerous. Various automatic k-complex detection-based machine learning methods are presented. However, these methods always suffered from imbalanced datasets, which impede the subsequent processing steps. NEW METHOD: In this study, an efficient method for k-complex detection using electroencephalogram (EEG)-based multi-domain features extraction and selection method coupled with a RUSBoosted tree model is presented. EEG signals are first decomposed using a tunable Q-factor wavelet transform (TQWT). Then, multi-domain features based on TQWT are pulled out from TQWT sub-bands, and a self-adaptive feature set is obtained from a feature selection based on the consistency-based filter for the detection of k-complexes. Finally, the RUSBoosted tree model is used to perform k-complex detection. RESULTS: Experimental outcomes manifest the efficacy of our proposed scheme in terms of the average performance of recall measure, AUC, and F(10)-score. The proposed method yields 92.41 ± 7.47%, 95.4 ± 4.32%, and 83.13 ± 8.59% for k-complex detection in Scenario 1 and also achieves similar results in Scenario 2. COMPARISON TO STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS: The RUSBoosted tree model was compared with three other machine learning classifiers [i.e., linear discriminant analysis (LDA), logistic regression, and linear support vector machine (SVM)]. The performance based on the kappa coefficient, recall measure, and F(10)-score provided evidence that the proposed model surpassed other algorithms in the detection of the k-complexes, especially for the recall measure. CONCLUSION: In summary, the RUSBoosted tree model presents a promising performance in dealing with highly imbalanced data. It can be an effective tool for doctors and neurologists to diagnose and treat sleep disorders. |
---|