Cargando…

Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars

Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China. Straw returning of new sugarcane cultivars has been practiced in the fields. Still, its response has not been explored on soil functionality, microbial community and yield of different sugarcane cu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Mengrong, Qi, Xiaohang, Shi, Yujie, Zhao, Junyang, Ahmad, Shakeel, Akhtar, Kashif, Chen, Baoshan, Lian, Tengxiang, He, Bing, Wen, Ronghui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998394
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1133973
_version_ 1784913135041249280
author Wang, Mengrong
Qi, Xiaohang
Shi, Yujie
Zhao, Junyang
Ahmad, Shakeel
Akhtar, Kashif
Chen, Baoshan
Lian, Tengxiang
He, Bing
Wen, Ronghui
author_facet Wang, Mengrong
Qi, Xiaohang
Shi, Yujie
Zhao, Junyang
Ahmad, Shakeel
Akhtar, Kashif
Chen, Baoshan
Lian, Tengxiang
He, Bing
Wen, Ronghui
author_sort Wang, Mengrong
collection PubMed
description Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China. Straw returning of new sugarcane cultivars has been practiced in the fields. Still, its response has not been explored on soil functionality, microbial community and yield of different sugarcane cultivars. Therefore, a comparison was made between an old sugarcane cultivar ROC22 and a new sugarcane cultivar Zhongzhe9 (Z9). The experimental treatments were: without (R, Z), with straw of the same cultivar (RR, ZZ), and with straw of different cultivars (RZ, ZR). Straw returning improved the contents of soil total nitrogen (TN by 73.21%), nitrate nitrogen (NO(3)(—)N by 119.61%), soil organic carbon (SOC by 20.16%), and available potassium (AK by 90.65%) at the jointing stage and were not significant at the seedling stage. The contents of NO(3)(—)N was 31.94 and 29.58%, available phosphorus (AP 53.21 and 27.19%), and available potassium (AK 42.43 and 11.92%) in RR and ZZ were more than in RZ and ZR. Straw returning with the same cultivar (RR, ZZ) significantly increased the richness and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community. The microbial diversity of cultivar Z9 (treatment Z) was greater than that of cultivar ROC22 (Treatment R). In the rhizosphere, the relative abundance of beneficial microorganisms Gemmatimonadaceae, Trechispora, Streptomyces, Chaetomium, etc., increased after the straw returned. Sugarcane straw enhanced the activity of Pseudomonas and Aspergillus and thus increased the yield of sugarcane., The richness and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community of Z9 increased at maturity. In ROC22, bacterial diversity increased, and fungal diversity decreased. These findings collectively suggested that the impact of Z9 straw returning was more beneficial than ROC22 on the activity of rhizosphere microorganism’s soil functionality and sugarcane production.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10043380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100433802023-03-29 Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars Wang, Mengrong Qi, Xiaohang Shi, Yujie Zhao, Junyang Ahmad, Shakeel Akhtar, Kashif Chen, Baoshan Lian, Tengxiang He, Bing Wen, Ronghui Front Microbiol Microbiology Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China. Straw returning of new sugarcane cultivars has been practiced in the fields. Still, its response has not been explored on soil functionality, microbial community and yield of different sugarcane cultivars. Therefore, a comparison was made between an old sugarcane cultivar ROC22 and a new sugarcane cultivar Zhongzhe9 (Z9). The experimental treatments were: without (R, Z), with straw of the same cultivar (RR, ZZ), and with straw of different cultivars (RZ, ZR). Straw returning improved the contents of soil total nitrogen (TN by 73.21%), nitrate nitrogen (NO(3)(—)N by 119.61%), soil organic carbon (SOC by 20.16%), and available potassium (AK by 90.65%) at the jointing stage and were not significant at the seedling stage. The contents of NO(3)(—)N was 31.94 and 29.58%, available phosphorus (AP 53.21 and 27.19%), and available potassium (AK 42.43 and 11.92%) in RR and ZZ were more than in RZ and ZR. Straw returning with the same cultivar (RR, ZZ) significantly increased the richness and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community. The microbial diversity of cultivar Z9 (treatment Z) was greater than that of cultivar ROC22 (Treatment R). In the rhizosphere, the relative abundance of beneficial microorganisms Gemmatimonadaceae, Trechispora, Streptomyces, Chaetomium, etc., increased after the straw returned. Sugarcane straw enhanced the activity of Pseudomonas and Aspergillus and thus increased the yield of sugarcane., The richness and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community of Z9 increased at maturity. In ROC22, bacterial diversity increased, and fungal diversity decreased. These findings collectively suggested that the impact of Z9 straw returning was more beneficial than ROC22 on the activity of rhizosphere microorganism’s soil functionality and sugarcane production. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10043380/ /pubmed/36998394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1133973 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wang, Qi, Shi, Zhao, Ahmad, Akhtar, Chen, Lian, He and Wen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Wang, Mengrong
Qi, Xiaohang
Shi, Yujie
Zhao, Junyang
Ahmad, Shakeel
Akhtar, Kashif
Chen, Baoshan
Lian, Tengxiang
He, Bing
Wen, Ronghui
Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars
title Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars
title_full Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars
title_fullStr Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars
title_full_unstemmed Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars
title_short Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars
title_sort sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998394
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1133973
work_keys_str_mv AT wangmengrong sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars
AT qixiaohang sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars
AT shiyujie sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars
AT zhaojunyang sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars
AT ahmadshakeel sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars
AT akhtarkashif sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars
AT chenbaoshan sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars
AT liantengxiang sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars
AT hebing sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars
AT wenronghui sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars