Cargando…
Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars
Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China. Straw returning of new sugarcane cultivars has been practiced in the fields. Still, its response has not been explored on soil functionality, microbial community and yield of different sugarcane cu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1133973 |
_version_ | 1784913135041249280 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Mengrong Qi, Xiaohang Shi, Yujie Zhao, Junyang Ahmad, Shakeel Akhtar, Kashif Chen, Baoshan Lian, Tengxiang He, Bing Wen, Ronghui |
author_facet | Wang, Mengrong Qi, Xiaohang Shi, Yujie Zhao, Junyang Ahmad, Shakeel Akhtar, Kashif Chen, Baoshan Lian, Tengxiang He, Bing Wen, Ronghui |
author_sort | Wang, Mengrong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China. Straw returning of new sugarcane cultivars has been practiced in the fields. Still, its response has not been explored on soil functionality, microbial community and yield of different sugarcane cultivars. Therefore, a comparison was made between an old sugarcane cultivar ROC22 and a new sugarcane cultivar Zhongzhe9 (Z9). The experimental treatments were: without (R, Z), with straw of the same cultivar (RR, ZZ), and with straw of different cultivars (RZ, ZR). Straw returning improved the contents of soil total nitrogen (TN by 73.21%), nitrate nitrogen (NO(3)(—)N by 119.61%), soil organic carbon (SOC by 20.16%), and available potassium (AK by 90.65%) at the jointing stage and were not significant at the seedling stage. The contents of NO(3)(—)N was 31.94 and 29.58%, available phosphorus (AP 53.21 and 27.19%), and available potassium (AK 42.43 and 11.92%) in RR and ZZ were more than in RZ and ZR. Straw returning with the same cultivar (RR, ZZ) significantly increased the richness and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community. The microbial diversity of cultivar Z9 (treatment Z) was greater than that of cultivar ROC22 (Treatment R). In the rhizosphere, the relative abundance of beneficial microorganisms Gemmatimonadaceae, Trechispora, Streptomyces, Chaetomium, etc., increased after the straw returned. Sugarcane straw enhanced the activity of Pseudomonas and Aspergillus and thus increased the yield of sugarcane., The richness and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community of Z9 increased at maturity. In ROC22, bacterial diversity increased, and fungal diversity decreased. These findings collectively suggested that the impact of Z9 straw returning was more beneficial than ROC22 on the activity of rhizosphere microorganism’s soil functionality and sugarcane production. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10043380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100433802023-03-29 Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars Wang, Mengrong Qi, Xiaohang Shi, Yujie Zhao, Junyang Ahmad, Shakeel Akhtar, Kashif Chen, Baoshan Lian, Tengxiang He, Bing Wen, Ronghui Front Microbiol Microbiology Sugarcane straw returned to the field has rapidly increased due to the bane on straw burning in China. Straw returning of new sugarcane cultivars has been practiced in the fields. Still, its response has not been explored on soil functionality, microbial community and yield of different sugarcane cultivars. Therefore, a comparison was made between an old sugarcane cultivar ROC22 and a new sugarcane cultivar Zhongzhe9 (Z9). The experimental treatments were: without (R, Z), with straw of the same cultivar (RR, ZZ), and with straw of different cultivars (RZ, ZR). Straw returning improved the contents of soil total nitrogen (TN by 73.21%), nitrate nitrogen (NO(3)(—)N by 119.61%), soil organic carbon (SOC by 20.16%), and available potassium (AK by 90.65%) at the jointing stage and were not significant at the seedling stage. The contents of NO(3)(—)N was 31.94 and 29.58%, available phosphorus (AP 53.21 and 27.19%), and available potassium (AK 42.43 and 11.92%) in RR and ZZ were more than in RZ and ZR. Straw returning with the same cultivar (RR, ZZ) significantly increased the richness and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community. The microbial diversity of cultivar Z9 (treatment Z) was greater than that of cultivar ROC22 (Treatment R). In the rhizosphere, the relative abundance of beneficial microorganisms Gemmatimonadaceae, Trechispora, Streptomyces, Chaetomium, etc., increased after the straw returned. Sugarcane straw enhanced the activity of Pseudomonas and Aspergillus and thus increased the yield of sugarcane., The richness and diversity of the rhizosphere microbial community of Z9 increased at maturity. In ROC22, bacterial diversity increased, and fungal diversity decreased. These findings collectively suggested that the impact of Z9 straw returning was more beneficial than ROC22 on the activity of rhizosphere microorganism’s soil functionality and sugarcane production. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10043380/ /pubmed/36998394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1133973 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wang, Qi, Shi, Zhao, Ahmad, Akhtar, Chen, Lian, He and Wen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Wang, Mengrong Qi, Xiaohang Shi, Yujie Zhao, Junyang Ahmad, Shakeel Akhtar, Kashif Chen, Baoshan Lian, Tengxiang He, Bing Wen, Ronghui Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars |
title | Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars |
title_full | Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars |
title_fullStr | Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars |
title_full_unstemmed | Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars |
title_short | Sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars |
title_sort | sugarcane straw returning is an approaching technique for the improvement of rhizosphere soil functionality, microbial community, and yield of different sugarcane cultivars |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1133973 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangmengrong sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars AT qixiaohang sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars AT shiyujie sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars AT zhaojunyang sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars AT ahmadshakeel sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars AT akhtarkashif sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars AT chenbaoshan sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars AT liantengxiang sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars AT hebing sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars AT wenronghui sugarcanestrawreturningisanapproachingtechniquefortheimprovementofrhizospheresoilfunctionalitymicrobialcommunityandyieldofdifferentsugarcanecultivars |