Cargando…

Happiness and high reliability develop affective trust in in-vehicle agents

The advancement of Conditionally Automated Vehicles (CAVs) requires research into critical factors to achieve an optimal interaction between drivers and vehicles. The present study investigated the impact of driver emotions and in-vehicle agent (IVA) reliability on drivers’ perceptions, trust, perce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zieger, Scott, Dong, Jiayuan, Taylor, Skye, Sanford, Caitlyn, Jeon, Myounghoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998376
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129294
_version_ 1784913138980749312
author Zieger, Scott
Dong, Jiayuan
Taylor, Skye
Sanford, Caitlyn
Jeon, Myounghoon
author_facet Zieger, Scott
Dong, Jiayuan
Taylor, Skye
Sanford, Caitlyn
Jeon, Myounghoon
author_sort Zieger, Scott
collection PubMed
description The advancement of Conditionally Automated Vehicles (CAVs) requires research into critical factors to achieve an optimal interaction between drivers and vehicles. The present study investigated the impact of driver emotions and in-vehicle agent (IVA) reliability on drivers’ perceptions, trust, perceived workload, situation awareness (SA), and driving performance toward a Level 3 automated vehicle system. Two humanoid robots acted as the in-vehicle intelligent agents to guide and communicate with the drivers during the experiment. Forty-eight college students participated in the driving simulator study. The participants each experienced a 12-min writing task to induce their designated emotion (happy, angry, or neutral) prior to the driving task. Their affective states were measured before the induction, after the induction, and after the experiment by completing an emotion assessment questionnaire. During the driving scenarios, IVAs informed the participants about five upcoming driving events and three of them asked for the participants to take over control. Participants’ SA and takeover driving performance were measured during driving; in addition, participants reported their subjective judgment ratings, trust, and perceived workload (NASA-TLX) toward the Level 3 automated vehicle system after each driving scenario. The results suggested that there was an interaction between emotions and agent reliability contributing to the part of affective trust and the jerk rate in takeover performance. Participants in the happy and high reliability conditions were shown to have a higher affective trust and a lower jerk rate than other emotions in the low reliability condition; however, no significant difference was found in the cognitive trust and other driving performance measures. We suggested that affective trust can be achieved only when both conditions met, including drivers’ happy emotion and high reliability. Happy participants also perceived more physical demand than angry and neutral participants. Our results indicated that trust depends on driver emotional states interacting with reliability of the system, which suggested future research and design should consider the impact of driver emotions and system reliability on automated vehicles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10043396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100433962023-03-29 Happiness and high reliability develop affective trust in in-vehicle agents Zieger, Scott Dong, Jiayuan Taylor, Skye Sanford, Caitlyn Jeon, Myounghoon Front Psychol Psychology The advancement of Conditionally Automated Vehicles (CAVs) requires research into critical factors to achieve an optimal interaction between drivers and vehicles. The present study investigated the impact of driver emotions and in-vehicle agent (IVA) reliability on drivers’ perceptions, trust, perceived workload, situation awareness (SA), and driving performance toward a Level 3 automated vehicle system. Two humanoid robots acted as the in-vehicle intelligent agents to guide and communicate with the drivers during the experiment. Forty-eight college students participated in the driving simulator study. The participants each experienced a 12-min writing task to induce their designated emotion (happy, angry, or neutral) prior to the driving task. Their affective states were measured before the induction, after the induction, and after the experiment by completing an emotion assessment questionnaire. During the driving scenarios, IVAs informed the participants about five upcoming driving events and three of them asked for the participants to take over control. Participants’ SA and takeover driving performance were measured during driving; in addition, participants reported their subjective judgment ratings, trust, and perceived workload (NASA-TLX) toward the Level 3 automated vehicle system after each driving scenario. The results suggested that there was an interaction between emotions and agent reliability contributing to the part of affective trust and the jerk rate in takeover performance. Participants in the happy and high reliability conditions were shown to have a higher affective trust and a lower jerk rate than other emotions in the low reliability condition; however, no significant difference was found in the cognitive trust and other driving performance measures. We suggested that affective trust can be achieved only when both conditions met, including drivers’ happy emotion and high reliability. Happy participants also perceived more physical demand than angry and neutral participants. Our results indicated that trust depends on driver emotional states interacting with reliability of the system, which suggested future research and design should consider the impact of driver emotions and system reliability on automated vehicles. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10043396/ /pubmed/36998376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129294 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zieger, Dong, Taylor, Sanford and Jeon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Zieger, Scott
Dong, Jiayuan
Taylor, Skye
Sanford, Caitlyn
Jeon, Myounghoon
Happiness and high reliability develop affective trust in in-vehicle agents
title Happiness and high reliability develop affective trust in in-vehicle agents
title_full Happiness and high reliability develop affective trust in in-vehicle agents
title_fullStr Happiness and high reliability develop affective trust in in-vehicle agents
title_full_unstemmed Happiness and high reliability develop affective trust in in-vehicle agents
title_short Happiness and high reliability develop affective trust in in-vehicle agents
title_sort happiness and high reliability develop affective trust in in-vehicle agents
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998376
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129294
work_keys_str_mv AT ziegerscott happinessandhighreliabilitydevelopaffectivetrustininvehicleagents
AT dongjiayuan happinessandhighreliabilitydevelopaffectivetrustininvehicleagents
AT taylorskye happinessandhighreliabilitydevelopaffectivetrustininvehicleagents
AT sanfordcaitlyn happinessandhighreliabilitydevelopaffectivetrustininvehicleagents
AT jeonmyounghoon happinessandhighreliabilitydevelopaffectivetrustininvehicleagents