Cargando…
Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study
BACKGROUND: Patients admitted to hospital with sepsis are at persistent risk of poor outcome after discharge. Many tools are available to risk-stratify sepsis patients for in-hospital mortality. This study aimed to identify the best risk-stratification tool to prognosticate outcome 180 days after ad...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36999068 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.985444 |
_version_ | 1784913150355701760 |
---|---|
author | Sivayoham, Narani Hussain, Adil N. Sheerin, Thomas Dwivedi, Prerak Curpanen, Danalakshmee Rhodes, Andrew |
author_facet | Sivayoham, Narani Hussain, Adil N. Sheerin, Thomas Dwivedi, Prerak Curpanen, Danalakshmee Rhodes, Andrew |
author_sort | Sivayoham, Narani |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients admitted to hospital with sepsis are at persistent risk of poor outcome after discharge. Many tools are available to risk-stratify sepsis patients for in-hospital mortality. This study aimed to identify the best risk-stratification tool to prognosticate outcome 180 days after admission via the emergency department (ED) with suspected sepsis. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed of adult ED patients who were admitted after receiving intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of a suspected sepsis, between 1(st) March and 31(st) August 2019. The Risk-stratification of ED suspected Sepsis (REDS) score, SOFA score, Red-flag sepsis criteria met, NICE high-risk criteria met, the NEWS2 score and the SIRS criteria, were calculated for each patient. Death and survival at 180 days were noted. Patients were stratified in to high and low-risk groups as per accepted criteria for each risk-stratification tool. Kaplan–Meier curves were plotted for each tool and the log-rank test performed. The tools were compared using Cox-proportional hazard regression (CPHR). The tools were studied further in those without the following specified co-morbidities: Dementia, malignancy, Rockwood Frailty score of 6 or more, long-term oxygen therapy and previous do-not-resuscitate orders. RESULTS: Of the 1,057 patients studied 146 (13.8%) died at hospital discharge and 284 were known to have died within 180 days. Overall survival proportion was 74.4% at 180 days and 8.6% of the population was censored before 180 days. Only the REDS and SOFA scores identified less than 50% of the population as high-risk. All tools except the SIRS criteria, prognosticated for outcome at 180 days; Log-rank tests between high and low-risk groups were: REDS score p < 0.0001, SOFA score p < 0.0001, Red-flag criteria p = 0.001, NICE high-risk criteria p = 0.0001, NEWS2 score p = 0.003 and SIRS criteria p = 0.98. On CPHR, the REDS [Hazard ratio (HR) 2.54 (1.92–3.35)] and SOFA [HR 1.58 (1.24–2.03)] scores out-performed the other risk-stratification tools. In patients without the specified co-morbidities, only the REDS score and the SOFA score risk-stratified for outcome at 180 days. CONCLUSION: In this study, all the risk-stratification tools studied were found to prognosticate for outcome at 180 days, except the SIRS criteria. The REDS and SOFA scores outperformed the other tools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10043441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100434412023-03-29 Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study Sivayoham, Narani Hussain, Adil N. Sheerin, Thomas Dwivedi, Prerak Curpanen, Danalakshmee Rhodes, Andrew Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Patients admitted to hospital with sepsis are at persistent risk of poor outcome after discharge. Many tools are available to risk-stratify sepsis patients for in-hospital mortality. This study aimed to identify the best risk-stratification tool to prognosticate outcome 180 days after admission via the emergency department (ED) with suspected sepsis. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed of adult ED patients who were admitted after receiving intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of a suspected sepsis, between 1(st) March and 31(st) August 2019. The Risk-stratification of ED suspected Sepsis (REDS) score, SOFA score, Red-flag sepsis criteria met, NICE high-risk criteria met, the NEWS2 score and the SIRS criteria, were calculated for each patient. Death and survival at 180 days were noted. Patients were stratified in to high and low-risk groups as per accepted criteria for each risk-stratification tool. Kaplan–Meier curves were plotted for each tool and the log-rank test performed. The tools were compared using Cox-proportional hazard regression (CPHR). The tools were studied further in those without the following specified co-morbidities: Dementia, malignancy, Rockwood Frailty score of 6 or more, long-term oxygen therapy and previous do-not-resuscitate orders. RESULTS: Of the 1,057 patients studied 146 (13.8%) died at hospital discharge and 284 were known to have died within 180 days. Overall survival proportion was 74.4% at 180 days and 8.6% of the population was censored before 180 days. Only the REDS and SOFA scores identified less than 50% of the population as high-risk. All tools except the SIRS criteria, prognosticated for outcome at 180 days; Log-rank tests between high and low-risk groups were: REDS score p < 0.0001, SOFA score p < 0.0001, Red-flag criteria p = 0.001, NICE high-risk criteria p = 0.0001, NEWS2 score p = 0.003 and SIRS criteria p = 0.98. On CPHR, the REDS [Hazard ratio (HR) 2.54 (1.92–3.35)] and SOFA [HR 1.58 (1.24–2.03)] scores out-performed the other risk-stratification tools. In patients without the specified co-morbidities, only the REDS score and the SOFA score risk-stratified for outcome at 180 days. CONCLUSION: In this study, all the risk-stratification tools studied were found to prognosticate for outcome at 180 days, except the SIRS criteria. The REDS and SOFA scores outperformed the other tools. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10043441/ /pubmed/36999068 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.985444 Text en Copyright © 2023 Sivayoham, Hussain, Sheerin, Dwivedi, Curpanen and Rhodes. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Sivayoham, Narani Hussain, Adil N. Sheerin, Thomas Dwivedi, Prerak Curpanen, Danalakshmee Rhodes, Andrew Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study |
title | Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study |
title_full | Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study |
title_fullStr | Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study |
title_short | Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study |
title_sort | prognostic performance of the reds score, sofa score, news2 score, and the red-flag, nice high-risk, and sirs criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – an observational cohort study |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36999068 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.985444 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sivayohamnarani prognosticperformanceoftheredsscoresofascorenews2scoreandtheredflagnicehighriskandsirscriteriatopredictsurvivalat180daysinemergencydepartmentpatientsadmittedwithsuspectedsepsisanobservationalcohortstudy AT hussainadiln prognosticperformanceoftheredsscoresofascorenews2scoreandtheredflagnicehighriskandsirscriteriatopredictsurvivalat180daysinemergencydepartmentpatientsadmittedwithsuspectedsepsisanobservationalcohortstudy AT sheerinthomas prognosticperformanceoftheredsscoresofascorenews2scoreandtheredflagnicehighriskandsirscriteriatopredictsurvivalat180daysinemergencydepartmentpatientsadmittedwithsuspectedsepsisanobservationalcohortstudy AT dwivediprerak prognosticperformanceoftheredsscoresofascorenews2scoreandtheredflagnicehighriskandsirscriteriatopredictsurvivalat180daysinemergencydepartmentpatientsadmittedwithsuspectedsepsisanobservationalcohortstudy AT curpanendanalakshmee prognosticperformanceoftheredsscoresofascorenews2scoreandtheredflagnicehighriskandsirscriteriatopredictsurvivalat180daysinemergencydepartmentpatientsadmittedwithsuspectedsepsisanobservationalcohortstudy AT rhodesandrew prognosticperformanceoftheredsscoresofascorenews2scoreandtheredflagnicehighriskandsirscriteriatopredictsurvivalat180daysinemergencydepartmentpatientsadmittedwithsuspectedsepsisanobservationalcohortstudy |