Cargando…

Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study

BACKGROUND: Patients admitted to hospital with sepsis are at persistent risk of poor outcome after discharge. Many tools are available to risk-stratify sepsis patients for in-hospital mortality. This study aimed to identify the best risk-stratification tool to prognosticate outcome 180 days after ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sivayoham, Narani, Hussain, Adil N., Sheerin, Thomas, Dwivedi, Prerak, Curpanen, Danalakshmee, Rhodes, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36999068
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.985444
_version_ 1784913150355701760
author Sivayoham, Narani
Hussain, Adil N.
Sheerin, Thomas
Dwivedi, Prerak
Curpanen, Danalakshmee
Rhodes, Andrew
author_facet Sivayoham, Narani
Hussain, Adil N.
Sheerin, Thomas
Dwivedi, Prerak
Curpanen, Danalakshmee
Rhodes, Andrew
author_sort Sivayoham, Narani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients admitted to hospital with sepsis are at persistent risk of poor outcome after discharge. Many tools are available to risk-stratify sepsis patients for in-hospital mortality. This study aimed to identify the best risk-stratification tool to prognosticate outcome 180 days after admission via the emergency department (ED) with suspected sepsis. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed of adult ED patients who were admitted after receiving intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of a suspected sepsis, between 1(st) March and 31(st) August 2019. The Risk-stratification of ED suspected Sepsis (REDS) score, SOFA score, Red-flag sepsis criteria met, NICE high-risk criteria met, the NEWS2 score and the SIRS criteria, were calculated for each patient. Death and survival at 180 days were noted. Patients were stratified in to high and low-risk groups as per accepted criteria for each risk-stratification tool. Kaplan–Meier curves were plotted for each tool and the log-rank test performed. The tools were compared using Cox-proportional hazard regression (CPHR). The tools were studied further in those without the following specified co-morbidities: Dementia, malignancy, Rockwood Frailty score of 6 or more, long-term oxygen therapy and previous do-not-resuscitate orders. RESULTS: Of the 1,057 patients studied 146 (13.8%) died at hospital discharge and 284 were known to have died within 180 days. Overall survival proportion was 74.4% at 180 days and 8.6% of the population was censored before 180 days. Only the REDS and SOFA scores identified less than 50% of the population as high-risk. All tools except the SIRS criteria, prognosticated for outcome at 180 days; Log-rank tests between high and low-risk groups were: REDS score p < 0.0001, SOFA score p < 0.0001, Red-flag criteria p = 0.001, NICE high-risk criteria p = 0.0001, NEWS2 score p = 0.003 and SIRS criteria p = 0.98. On CPHR, the REDS [Hazard ratio (HR) 2.54 (1.92–3.35)] and SOFA [HR 1.58 (1.24–2.03)] scores out-performed the other risk-stratification tools. In patients without the specified co-morbidities, only the REDS score and the SOFA score risk-stratified for outcome at 180 days. CONCLUSION: In this study, all the risk-stratification tools studied were found to prognosticate for outcome at 180 days, except the SIRS criteria. The REDS and SOFA scores outperformed the other tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10043441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100434412023-03-29 Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study Sivayoham, Narani Hussain, Adil N. Sheerin, Thomas Dwivedi, Prerak Curpanen, Danalakshmee Rhodes, Andrew Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Patients admitted to hospital with sepsis are at persistent risk of poor outcome after discharge. Many tools are available to risk-stratify sepsis patients for in-hospital mortality. This study aimed to identify the best risk-stratification tool to prognosticate outcome 180 days after admission via the emergency department (ED) with suspected sepsis. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed of adult ED patients who were admitted after receiving intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of a suspected sepsis, between 1(st) March and 31(st) August 2019. The Risk-stratification of ED suspected Sepsis (REDS) score, SOFA score, Red-flag sepsis criteria met, NICE high-risk criteria met, the NEWS2 score and the SIRS criteria, were calculated for each patient. Death and survival at 180 days were noted. Patients were stratified in to high and low-risk groups as per accepted criteria for each risk-stratification tool. Kaplan–Meier curves were plotted for each tool and the log-rank test performed. The tools were compared using Cox-proportional hazard regression (CPHR). The tools were studied further in those without the following specified co-morbidities: Dementia, malignancy, Rockwood Frailty score of 6 or more, long-term oxygen therapy and previous do-not-resuscitate orders. RESULTS: Of the 1,057 patients studied 146 (13.8%) died at hospital discharge and 284 were known to have died within 180 days. Overall survival proportion was 74.4% at 180 days and 8.6% of the population was censored before 180 days. Only the REDS and SOFA scores identified less than 50% of the population as high-risk. All tools except the SIRS criteria, prognosticated for outcome at 180 days; Log-rank tests between high and low-risk groups were: REDS score p < 0.0001, SOFA score p < 0.0001, Red-flag criteria p = 0.001, NICE high-risk criteria p = 0.0001, NEWS2 score p = 0.003 and SIRS criteria p = 0.98. On CPHR, the REDS [Hazard ratio (HR) 2.54 (1.92–3.35)] and SOFA [HR 1.58 (1.24–2.03)] scores out-performed the other risk-stratification tools. In patients without the specified co-morbidities, only the REDS score and the SOFA score risk-stratified for outcome at 180 days. CONCLUSION: In this study, all the risk-stratification tools studied were found to prognosticate for outcome at 180 days, except the SIRS criteria. The REDS and SOFA scores outperformed the other tools. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10043441/ /pubmed/36999068 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.985444 Text en Copyright © 2023 Sivayoham, Hussain, Sheerin, Dwivedi, Curpanen and Rhodes. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Sivayoham, Narani
Hussain, Adil N.
Sheerin, Thomas
Dwivedi, Prerak
Curpanen, Danalakshmee
Rhodes, Andrew
Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study
title Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study
title_full Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study
title_fullStr Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study
title_short Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study
title_sort prognostic performance of the reds score, sofa score, news2 score, and the red-flag, nice high-risk, and sirs criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – an observational cohort study
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36999068
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.985444
work_keys_str_mv AT sivayohamnarani prognosticperformanceoftheredsscoresofascorenews2scoreandtheredflagnicehighriskandsirscriteriatopredictsurvivalat180daysinemergencydepartmentpatientsadmittedwithsuspectedsepsisanobservationalcohortstudy
AT hussainadiln prognosticperformanceoftheredsscoresofascorenews2scoreandtheredflagnicehighriskandsirscriteriatopredictsurvivalat180daysinemergencydepartmentpatientsadmittedwithsuspectedsepsisanobservationalcohortstudy
AT sheerinthomas prognosticperformanceoftheredsscoresofascorenews2scoreandtheredflagnicehighriskandsirscriteriatopredictsurvivalat180daysinemergencydepartmentpatientsadmittedwithsuspectedsepsisanobservationalcohortstudy
AT dwivediprerak prognosticperformanceoftheredsscoresofascorenews2scoreandtheredflagnicehighriskandsirscriteriatopredictsurvivalat180daysinemergencydepartmentpatientsadmittedwithsuspectedsepsisanobservationalcohortstudy
AT curpanendanalakshmee prognosticperformanceoftheredsscoresofascorenews2scoreandtheredflagnicehighriskandsirscriteriatopredictsurvivalat180daysinemergencydepartmentpatientsadmittedwithsuspectedsepsisanobservationalcohortstudy
AT rhodesandrew prognosticperformanceoftheredsscoresofascorenews2scoreandtheredflagnicehighriskandsirscriteriatopredictsurvivalat180daysinemergencydepartmentpatientsadmittedwithsuspectedsepsisanobservationalcohortstudy