Cargando…

Impact of lenvatinib-induced proteinuria and renal dysfunction in patients with thyroid cancer

BACKGROUND: Proteinuria is the most frequent adverse event of lenvatinib use. However, the association between lenvatinib-induced proteinuria and renal dysfunction remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with thyroid cancer without proteinuria treated with l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shibutani, Yuma, Suzuki, Shinya, Sagara, Atsunobu, Enokida, Tomohiro, Okano, Susumu, Fujisawa, Takao, Sato, Fumiaki, Yumoto, Tetsuro, Sano, Motohiko, Kawasaki, Toshikatsu, Tahara, Makoto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998435
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1154771
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Proteinuria is the most frequent adverse event of lenvatinib use. However, the association between lenvatinib-induced proteinuria and renal dysfunction remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with thyroid cancer without proteinuria treated with lenvatinib as a first-line systemic therapy at the initiation of treatment to assess the association between lenvatinib-induced proteinuria and renal function and the risk factors for the development of ≥3+ proteinuria on a dipstick test. Proteinuria was assessed by the dipstick test throughout the treatment in all cases. RESULTS: Of the 76 patients, 39 developed ≤2+ proteinuria (low proteinuria group) and 37 developed ≥3+ proteinuria (high proteinuria group). There was no significant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between high and low proteinuria groups at each time point, but there was a trend toward a significant decrease in eGFR of -9.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in all patients after 2 years of treatment. The percentage of change in eGFR (ΔeGFR) significantly decreased in the high proteinuria group compared to that in the low proteinuria group (ΔeGFR: -6.8% vs. -17.2%, p=0.04). However, there was no significant difference in development of severe renal dysfunction with eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) between the two groups. Moreover, no patients permanently discontinued treatment because of renal dysfunction in both groups. Furthermore, renal function after completion of lenvatinib was reversible. CONCLUSIONS: There was no association between the degree of lenvatinib-induced proteinuria and renal function. Therefore, treatment should be continued with attention to renal function, regardless of the degree of proteinuria.