Cargando…

Emerging Diabetes Technologies: Continuous Glucose Monitors/Artificial Pancreases

Over the past decade there have been many advances in diabetes technologies, such as continuous glucose monitors (CGM s), insulin-delivery devices, and hybrid closed loop systems . Now most CGMs (Medtronic-Guardian, Dexcom-G6, and Abbott-Libre-2) have MARD values of < 10%, in contrast to two deca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almurashi, Abdulhalim M., Rodriguez, Erika, Garg, Satish K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer India 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37362851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41745-022-00348-3
_version_ 1784913245906141184
author Almurashi, Abdulhalim M.
Rodriguez, Erika
Garg, Satish K.
author_facet Almurashi, Abdulhalim M.
Rodriguez, Erika
Garg, Satish K.
author_sort Almurashi, Abdulhalim M.
collection PubMed
description Over the past decade there have been many advances in diabetes technologies, such as continuous glucose monitors (CGM s), insulin-delivery devices, and hybrid closed loop systems . Now most CGMs (Medtronic-Guardian, Dexcom-G6, and Abbott-Libre-2) have MARD values of < 10%, in contrast to two decades ago when the MARD used to be > 20%. In addition, the majority of the new CGMs do not require calibrations, and the latest CGMs last for 10–14 days. An implantable 6-months CGM by Eversense-3 is now approved in the USA and Europe. Recently, the FDA approved Libre 3 which provides real-time glucose values every minute. Even though it is approved as an iCGM it is not interoperable with automatic-insulin-delivery (AID) systems. The newer CGMs that are likely to be launched in the next few months in the USA include the 10–11 days Dexcom G7 (60% smaller than the existing G6), and the 7-days Medtronic Guardian 4. Most of the newer CGM have several features like automatic initialization, easy insertion, predictive alarms, and alerts. It has also been noticed that an arm insertion site might have better accuracy than abdomen or other sites, like the buttock for kids. Lag time between YSI and different sensors have been reported differently, sometimes it is down to 2–3 min; however, in many instances, it is still 15–20 min, especially when the rate of change of glucose is > 2 mg/min. We believe that in the next decade there will be a significant increase in the number of people who use CGM for their day-to-day diabetes care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10043869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer India
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100438692023-03-28 Emerging Diabetes Technologies: Continuous Glucose Monitors/Artificial Pancreases Almurashi, Abdulhalim M. Rodriguez, Erika Garg, Satish K. J Indian Inst Sci Review Article Over the past decade there have been many advances in diabetes technologies, such as continuous glucose monitors (CGM s), insulin-delivery devices, and hybrid closed loop systems . Now most CGMs (Medtronic-Guardian, Dexcom-G6, and Abbott-Libre-2) have MARD values of < 10%, in contrast to two decades ago when the MARD used to be > 20%. In addition, the majority of the new CGMs do not require calibrations, and the latest CGMs last for 10–14 days. An implantable 6-months CGM by Eversense-3 is now approved in the USA and Europe. Recently, the FDA approved Libre 3 which provides real-time glucose values every minute. Even though it is approved as an iCGM it is not interoperable with automatic-insulin-delivery (AID) systems. The newer CGMs that are likely to be launched in the next few months in the USA include the 10–11 days Dexcom G7 (60% smaller than the existing G6), and the 7-days Medtronic Guardian 4. Most of the newer CGM have several features like automatic initialization, easy insertion, predictive alarms, and alerts. It has also been noticed that an arm insertion site might have better accuracy than abdomen or other sites, like the buttock for kids. Lag time between YSI and different sensors have been reported differently, sometimes it is down to 2–3 min; however, in many instances, it is still 15–20 min, especially when the rate of change of glucose is > 2 mg/min. We believe that in the next decade there will be a significant increase in the number of people who use CGM for their day-to-day diabetes care. Springer India 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10043869/ /pubmed/37362851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41745-022-00348-3 Text en © Indian Institute of Science 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Review Article
Almurashi, Abdulhalim M.
Rodriguez, Erika
Garg, Satish K.
Emerging Diabetes Technologies: Continuous Glucose Monitors/Artificial Pancreases
title Emerging Diabetes Technologies: Continuous Glucose Monitors/Artificial Pancreases
title_full Emerging Diabetes Technologies: Continuous Glucose Monitors/Artificial Pancreases
title_fullStr Emerging Diabetes Technologies: Continuous Glucose Monitors/Artificial Pancreases
title_full_unstemmed Emerging Diabetes Technologies: Continuous Glucose Monitors/Artificial Pancreases
title_short Emerging Diabetes Technologies: Continuous Glucose Monitors/Artificial Pancreases
title_sort emerging diabetes technologies: continuous glucose monitors/artificial pancreases
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37362851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41745-022-00348-3
work_keys_str_mv AT almurashiabdulhalimm emergingdiabetestechnologiescontinuousglucosemonitorsartificialpancreases
AT rodriguezerika emergingdiabetestechnologiescontinuousglucosemonitorsartificialpancreases
AT gargsatishk emergingdiabetestechnologiescontinuousglucosemonitorsartificialpancreases