Cargando…

Real-life safety profile of mRNA vaccines for COVID-19: An analysis of VAERS database

INTRODUCTION: Since the first COVID-19 messenger RNA vaccines became available globally for emergency or conditional use, post-marketing surveillance activities have been implemented for the monitoring of any adverse events that might arise in daily clinical practice and were not detected earlier du...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santi Laurini, Greta, Montanaro, Nicola, Broccoli, Massimiliano, Bonaldo, Giulia, Motola, Domenico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37024412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.054
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Since the first COVID-19 messenger RNA vaccines became available globally for emergency or conditional use, post-marketing surveillance activities have been implemented for the monitoring of any adverse events that might arise in daily clinical practice and were not detected earlier during clinical trials. METHODS: Safety data concerning the BNT162b2 and the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines were collected from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for the period from December 2020 to October 15, 2021. In addition to a descriptive analysis of individuals who experienced an adverse event after vaccination, a case-non-case analysis was performed by using the Reporting Odds Ratio with 95 % confidence interval as statistical parameter for detecting differences in reporting rates between the two mRNA vaccines. RESULTS: At the cut-off date, a total of 758,040 reports were submitted to VAERS, of which 439,401 were related to the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine and 318,639 to the Moderna vaccine (mRNA-1273). Most common adverse events following immunization for both mRNA vaccines were headache, fatigue, pyrexia, dizziness, nausea, pain, chills, and pain in extremity. A disproportionality was found for BNT162b2 as compared with mRNA-1273 for some events of special interest, such as myocarditis [ROR 2.00; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.93–2.06], Bell’s palsy (1.34; 1.29–1.39), and anaphylactic shock (3.23; 2.96–3.53). CONCLUSION: Even if some rare adverse events were identified, our survey of post-marketing surveillance has provided further evidence of the favourable safety profile of mRNA vaccines.