Cargando…

Inhibition of Erythromycin and Erythromycin-Induced Resistance among Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates

The increasing incidence of erythromycin and erythromycin-induced resistance to clindamycin among Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a serious problem. Patients infected with inducible resistance phenotypes may fail to respond to clindamycin. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of erythrom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahfouz, Aya A., Said, Heba S., Elfeky, Sherin M., Shaaban, Mona I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10044026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36978370
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030503
_version_ 1784913272579817472
author Mahfouz, Aya A.
Said, Heba S.
Elfeky, Sherin M.
Shaaban, Mona I.
author_facet Mahfouz, Aya A.
Said, Heba S.
Elfeky, Sherin M.
Shaaban, Mona I.
author_sort Mahfouz, Aya A.
collection PubMed
description The increasing incidence of erythromycin and erythromycin-induced resistance to clindamycin among Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a serious problem. Patients infected with inducible resistance phenotypes may fail to respond to clindamycin. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of erythromycin and erythromycin-induced resistance and assess for potential inhibitors. A total of 99 isolates were purified from various clinical sources. Phenotypic detection of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLS(B))-resistance phenotypes was performed by D-test. MLS(B)-resistance genes were identified using PCR. Different compounds were tested for their effects on erythromycin and inducible clindamycin resistance by broth microdilution and checkerboard microdilution methods. The obtained data were evaluated using docking analysis. Ninety-one isolates were S. aureus. The prevalence of constitutive MLS(B), inducible MLS(B), and macrolide-streptogramin (MS) phenotypes was 39.6%, 14.3%, and 2.2%, respectively. Genes including ermC, ermA, ermB, msrA, msrB, lnuA, and mphC were found in 82.6%, 5.8%, 7.7%, 3.8%, 3.8%, 13.5%, and 3.8% of isolates, respectively. Erythromycin resistance was significantly reduced by doxorubicin, neomycin, and omeprazole. Quinine, ketoprofen, and fosfomycin combated and reversed erythromycin/clindamycin-induced resistance. This study highlighted the significance of managing antibiotic resistance and overcoming clindamycin treatment failure. Doxorubicin, neomycin, omeprazole, quinine, ketoprofen, and fosfomycin could be potential inhibitors of erythromycin and inducible clindamycin resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10044026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100440262023-03-29 Inhibition of Erythromycin and Erythromycin-Induced Resistance among Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates Mahfouz, Aya A. Said, Heba S. Elfeky, Sherin M. Shaaban, Mona I. Antibiotics (Basel) Article The increasing incidence of erythromycin and erythromycin-induced resistance to clindamycin among Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a serious problem. Patients infected with inducible resistance phenotypes may fail to respond to clindamycin. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of erythromycin and erythromycin-induced resistance and assess for potential inhibitors. A total of 99 isolates were purified from various clinical sources. Phenotypic detection of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLS(B))-resistance phenotypes was performed by D-test. MLS(B)-resistance genes were identified using PCR. Different compounds were tested for their effects on erythromycin and inducible clindamycin resistance by broth microdilution and checkerboard microdilution methods. The obtained data were evaluated using docking analysis. Ninety-one isolates were S. aureus. The prevalence of constitutive MLS(B), inducible MLS(B), and macrolide-streptogramin (MS) phenotypes was 39.6%, 14.3%, and 2.2%, respectively. Genes including ermC, ermA, ermB, msrA, msrB, lnuA, and mphC were found in 82.6%, 5.8%, 7.7%, 3.8%, 3.8%, 13.5%, and 3.8% of isolates, respectively. Erythromycin resistance was significantly reduced by doxorubicin, neomycin, and omeprazole. Quinine, ketoprofen, and fosfomycin combated and reversed erythromycin/clindamycin-induced resistance. This study highlighted the significance of managing antibiotic resistance and overcoming clindamycin treatment failure. Doxorubicin, neomycin, omeprazole, quinine, ketoprofen, and fosfomycin could be potential inhibitors of erythromycin and inducible clindamycin resistance. MDPI 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10044026/ /pubmed/36978370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030503 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mahfouz, Aya A.
Said, Heba S.
Elfeky, Sherin M.
Shaaban, Mona I.
Inhibition of Erythromycin and Erythromycin-Induced Resistance among Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates
title Inhibition of Erythromycin and Erythromycin-Induced Resistance among Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates
title_full Inhibition of Erythromycin and Erythromycin-Induced Resistance among Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates
title_fullStr Inhibition of Erythromycin and Erythromycin-Induced Resistance among Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates
title_full_unstemmed Inhibition of Erythromycin and Erythromycin-Induced Resistance among Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates
title_short Inhibition of Erythromycin and Erythromycin-Induced Resistance among Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates
title_sort inhibition of erythromycin and erythromycin-induced resistance among staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10044026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36978370
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030503
work_keys_str_mv AT mahfouzayaa inhibitionoferythromycinanderythromycininducedresistanceamongstaphylococcusaureusclinicalisolates
AT saidhebas inhibitionoferythromycinanderythromycininducedresistanceamongstaphylococcusaureusclinicalisolates
AT elfekysherinm inhibitionoferythromycinanderythromycininducedresistanceamongstaphylococcusaureusclinicalisolates
AT shaabanmonai inhibitionoferythromycinanderythromycininducedresistanceamongstaphylococcusaureusclinicalisolates