Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods

BACKGROUND: Preoperatively evaluating the feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement is the key to avoiding iatrogenic vertebral artery injury. However, it has not been verified whether the conventional CT measurements of C2 pediculoisthmic component (PIC) are reliable and accurate, and the results may lack validity. The purpose of this study is to analyze the evaluative performance of conventional CT measurements and to create an accurate predictor of morphometrics of C2 PIC. METHODS: A total of 304 C2 PICs were measured in 152 consecutive patients who underwent CT examination of the cervical spine between April 2020 and December 2020. We obtained the morphometric parameters of C2 PIC by measuring minimum PIC diameter (MPD) in CT multiplanar reconstruction versus conventional measurements of transverse PIC width (TPW), oblique PIC width (OPW) and definition of high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA). The outer diameter measured less than 4 mm in MPD was regarded as the standard of precluding safe C2 pedicle screw insertion. The evaluative performance of the conventional CT measurements was assessed, and the correlation between conventional CT measurements and measurements in CT multiplanar reconstruction was calculated. RESULTS: The parameters in OPW and MPD were measured significantly larger than those in TPW, and the preclusion of C2 pedicle screw placement evaluated from TPW and HRVA was significantly higher than that evaluated from OPW and MPD. The sensitivity of TPW was 93.09%, and the specificity was 79.31%. The sensitivity and specificity of OPW were 97.82% and 82.76%. The sensitivity of HRVA was 88.36%, and the specificity was 96.55%. Strong agreement with the highest correlation coefficient (0.879) and determination coefficient (0.7720) suggested that the outer diameter of OPW could be useful for the precise prediction of MPD. CONCLUSIONS: CT MPR allows accurate measurement of the narrowest section of the C2 PIC. The outer diameter of OPW could be simply measured and be useful for precise prediction of MPD, which makes C2 pedicle screw placement more safely than the conventional measurement of TPW and HRVA.