Cargando…

The Prosocial-Culture-Work Nexus: An Integrative Literature Review and Future Research Agenda

Organization culture is a potential antecedent and moderator of prosocial behaviors at work. So, what is currently known about the prosocial-culture-work nexus? Studies of this nexus may be predicted to exist in the form of research on organization cultures of three types. One would be studies of sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gibb, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10044722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36975228
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs13030203
_version_ 1784913416594391040
author Gibb, Stephen
author_facet Gibb, Stephen
author_sort Gibb, Stephen
collection PubMed
description Organization culture is a potential antecedent and moderator of prosocial behaviors at work. So, what is currently known about the prosocial-culture-work nexus? Studies of this nexus may be predicted to exist in the form of research on organization cultures of three types. One would be studies of specific organization cultures representing espoused Employer Value Propositions (EVPs). One would be etic studies using constructs of organization culture. The other would be emic studies, with the ‘thick description’ associated with ethnography/anthropology. An integrative literature review on the prosocial-organization culture-work nexus located 22 studies. Most studies are of the etic type, while others are mainly concerned with theory development. There is no evidence of a clear concept of organization culture being used in any study. The future research agenda for the prosocial-culture-work nexus follow from this. Constructs of organization culture need to be adopted and used. There is huge scope for EVP studies to explicitly and critically explore the breadth of the prosocial themes these often contain. Etic studies are the ones where the lack of organization culture constructs is most striking, given their methodologies. More emic studies with ethnographic/anthropological depth to explore, both work organizations in single countries, and in comparative studies across countries, are needed. Better clarified prosocial constructs will not in themselves advance knowledge if the organizational culture contexts in which prosociality exists remain under-appreciated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10044722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100447222023-03-29 The Prosocial-Culture-Work Nexus: An Integrative Literature Review and Future Research Agenda Gibb, Stephen Behav Sci (Basel) Review Organization culture is a potential antecedent and moderator of prosocial behaviors at work. So, what is currently known about the prosocial-culture-work nexus? Studies of this nexus may be predicted to exist in the form of research on organization cultures of three types. One would be studies of specific organization cultures representing espoused Employer Value Propositions (EVPs). One would be etic studies using constructs of organization culture. The other would be emic studies, with the ‘thick description’ associated with ethnography/anthropology. An integrative literature review on the prosocial-organization culture-work nexus located 22 studies. Most studies are of the etic type, while others are mainly concerned with theory development. There is no evidence of a clear concept of organization culture being used in any study. The future research agenda for the prosocial-culture-work nexus follow from this. Constructs of organization culture need to be adopted and used. There is huge scope for EVP studies to explicitly and critically explore the breadth of the prosocial themes these often contain. Etic studies are the ones where the lack of organization culture constructs is most striking, given their methodologies. More emic studies with ethnographic/anthropological depth to explore, both work organizations in single countries, and in comparative studies across countries, are needed. Better clarified prosocial constructs will not in themselves advance knowledge if the organizational culture contexts in which prosociality exists remain under-appreciated. MDPI 2023-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10044722/ /pubmed/36975228 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs13030203 Text en © 2023 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Gibb, Stephen
The Prosocial-Culture-Work Nexus: An Integrative Literature Review and Future Research Agenda
title The Prosocial-Culture-Work Nexus: An Integrative Literature Review and Future Research Agenda
title_full The Prosocial-Culture-Work Nexus: An Integrative Literature Review and Future Research Agenda
title_fullStr The Prosocial-Culture-Work Nexus: An Integrative Literature Review and Future Research Agenda
title_full_unstemmed The Prosocial-Culture-Work Nexus: An Integrative Literature Review and Future Research Agenda
title_short The Prosocial-Culture-Work Nexus: An Integrative Literature Review and Future Research Agenda
title_sort prosocial-culture-work nexus: an integrative literature review and future research agenda
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10044722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36975228
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs13030203
work_keys_str_mv AT gibbstephen theprosocialcultureworknexusanintegrativeliteraturereviewandfutureresearchagenda
AT gibbstephen prosocialcultureworknexusanintegrativeliteraturereviewandfutureresearchagenda