Cargando…

Identifying Patients in Whom the Follow-Up Scheme after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Could Be Optimized in the First Year after Surgery: Reducing Healthcare Burden

Background: The currently advised follow-up scheme of PSA testing after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is strict and might pose a burden to our healthcare system. We aimed to optimize the 1-year follow-up scheme for patients who undergo RARP. Methods: All patients with histologically-pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veerman, Hans, van der Graaf, Sophia H., Meijer, Dennie, Hagens, Marinus J., Tillier, Corinne N., van Leeuwen, Pim J., van der Poel, Henk G., Vis, André N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10044848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36979706
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030727
_version_ 1784913447945764864
author Veerman, Hans
van der Graaf, Sophia H.
Meijer, Dennie
Hagens, Marinus J.
Tillier, Corinne N.
van Leeuwen, Pim J.
van der Poel, Henk G.
Vis, André N.
author_facet Veerman, Hans
van der Graaf, Sophia H.
Meijer, Dennie
Hagens, Marinus J.
Tillier, Corinne N.
van Leeuwen, Pim J.
van der Poel, Henk G.
Vis, André N.
author_sort Veerman, Hans
collection PubMed
description Background: The currently advised follow-up scheme of PSA testing after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is strict and might pose a burden to our healthcare system. We aimed to optimize the 1-year follow-up scheme for patients who undergo RARP. Methods: All patients with histologically-proven prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent RARP between 2018 and August 2022 in the Prostate Cancer Network in the Netherlands were retrospectively evaluated. We excluded patients who underwent salvage RARP and patients who had <1 year of PSA follow-up. Postoperative PSA values were collected. Biochemical persistence (BCP) was defined as PSA level >0.10 ng/mL at 0–4 months after RARP, whereas biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as PSA level >0.2 ng/mL at any time point after RARP. We aimed to identify a group of patients who had a very low risk of BCR at different time points after surgery. Results: Of all 1155 patients, BCP was observed in 151 (13%), of whom 79 (6.8%) had PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL. BCR further developed in 51 (4.7%) and 37 (3.4%) patients at 5–8 and 9–12 months after RARP, respectively. In 12 patients, BCR was found at 5–8 months after RARP in the absence of BCP. These patients represented 1.2% (12/1004) of the entire group. In other words, 98.8% (992/1004) of patients who had an unmeasurable PSA level at 0–4 months after RARP also had an unmeasurable PSA level 5–8 months after surgery. Limitations are the retrospective design and incomplete follow-up. Conclusions: Patients with an unmeasurable PSA level at 3–4 months after RARP may not need to be retested until 12 months of follow-up, as almost 100% of patients will not have the biochemically recurrent disease at 5–8 months of follow-up. This will reduce PSA testing substantially at the cost of hardly any missed patients with recurrent disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10044848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100448482023-03-29 Identifying Patients in Whom the Follow-Up Scheme after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Could Be Optimized in the First Year after Surgery: Reducing Healthcare Burden Veerman, Hans van der Graaf, Sophia H. Meijer, Dennie Hagens, Marinus J. Tillier, Corinne N. van Leeuwen, Pim J. van der Poel, Henk G. Vis, André N. Biomedicines Article Background: The currently advised follow-up scheme of PSA testing after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is strict and might pose a burden to our healthcare system. We aimed to optimize the 1-year follow-up scheme for patients who undergo RARP. Methods: All patients with histologically-proven prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent RARP between 2018 and August 2022 in the Prostate Cancer Network in the Netherlands were retrospectively evaluated. We excluded patients who underwent salvage RARP and patients who had <1 year of PSA follow-up. Postoperative PSA values were collected. Biochemical persistence (BCP) was defined as PSA level >0.10 ng/mL at 0–4 months after RARP, whereas biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as PSA level >0.2 ng/mL at any time point after RARP. We aimed to identify a group of patients who had a very low risk of BCR at different time points after surgery. Results: Of all 1155 patients, BCP was observed in 151 (13%), of whom 79 (6.8%) had PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL. BCR further developed in 51 (4.7%) and 37 (3.4%) patients at 5–8 and 9–12 months after RARP, respectively. In 12 patients, BCR was found at 5–8 months after RARP in the absence of BCP. These patients represented 1.2% (12/1004) of the entire group. In other words, 98.8% (992/1004) of patients who had an unmeasurable PSA level at 0–4 months after RARP also had an unmeasurable PSA level 5–8 months after surgery. Limitations are the retrospective design and incomplete follow-up. Conclusions: Patients with an unmeasurable PSA level at 3–4 months after RARP may not need to be retested until 12 months of follow-up, as almost 100% of patients will not have the biochemically recurrent disease at 5–8 months of follow-up. This will reduce PSA testing substantially at the cost of hardly any missed patients with recurrent disease. MDPI 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10044848/ /pubmed/36979706 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030727 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Veerman, Hans
van der Graaf, Sophia H.
Meijer, Dennie
Hagens, Marinus J.
Tillier, Corinne N.
van Leeuwen, Pim J.
van der Poel, Henk G.
Vis, André N.
Identifying Patients in Whom the Follow-Up Scheme after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Could Be Optimized in the First Year after Surgery: Reducing Healthcare Burden
title Identifying Patients in Whom the Follow-Up Scheme after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Could Be Optimized in the First Year after Surgery: Reducing Healthcare Burden
title_full Identifying Patients in Whom the Follow-Up Scheme after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Could Be Optimized in the First Year after Surgery: Reducing Healthcare Burden
title_fullStr Identifying Patients in Whom the Follow-Up Scheme after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Could Be Optimized in the First Year after Surgery: Reducing Healthcare Burden
title_full_unstemmed Identifying Patients in Whom the Follow-Up Scheme after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Could Be Optimized in the First Year after Surgery: Reducing Healthcare Burden
title_short Identifying Patients in Whom the Follow-Up Scheme after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Could Be Optimized in the First Year after Surgery: Reducing Healthcare Burden
title_sort identifying patients in whom the follow-up scheme after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy could be optimized in the first year after surgery: reducing healthcare burden
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10044848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36979706
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030727
work_keys_str_mv AT veermanhans identifyingpatientsinwhomthefollowupschemeafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomycouldbeoptimizedinthefirstyearaftersurgeryreducinghealthcareburden
AT vandergraafsophiah identifyingpatientsinwhomthefollowupschemeafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomycouldbeoptimizedinthefirstyearaftersurgeryreducinghealthcareburden
AT meijerdennie identifyingpatientsinwhomthefollowupschemeafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomycouldbeoptimizedinthefirstyearaftersurgeryreducinghealthcareburden
AT hagensmarinusj identifyingpatientsinwhomthefollowupschemeafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomycouldbeoptimizedinthefirstyearaftersurgeryreducinghealthcareburden
AT tilliercorinnen identifyingpatientsinwhomthefollowupschemeafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomycouldbeoptimizedinthefirstyearaftersurgeryreducinghealthcareburden
AT vanleeuwenpimj identifyingpatientsinwhomthefollowupschemeafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomycouldbeoptimizedinthefirstyearaftersurgeryreducinghealthcareburden
AT vanderpoelhenkg identifyingpatientsinwhomthefollowupschemeafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomycouldbeoptimizedinthefirstyearaftersurgeryreducinghealthcareburden
AT visandren identifyingpatientsinwhomthefollowupschemeafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomycouldbeoptimizedinthefirstyearaftersurgeryreducinghealthcareburden