Cargando…

Effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab with and without concomitant methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the prospective, noninterventional AWARE study

BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies are often prescribed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have inadequate responses to or are intolerant of methotrexate (MTX) and patients with poor prognostic indicators. This post hoc analysis evaluated effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab + ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Broadwell, Aaron, Schechtman, Joy, Conaway, Douglas, Kivitz, Alan, Shiff, Natalie J., Black, Shawn, Xu, Stephen, Langholff, Wayne, Schwartzman, Sergio, Curtis, Jeffrey R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10045110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36973741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-023-00329-8
_version_ 1784913519145123840
author Broadwell, Aaron
Schechtman, Joy
Conaway, Douglas
Kivitz, Alan
Shiff, Natalie J.
Black, Shawn
Xu, Stephen
Langholff, Wayne
Schwartzman, Sergio
Curtis, Jeffrey R.
author_facet Broadwell, Aaron
Schechtman, Joy
Conaway, Douglas
Kivitz, Alan
Shiff, Natalie J.
Black, Shawn
Xu, Stephen
Langholff, Wayne
Schwartzman, Sergio
Curtis, Jeffrey R.
author_sort Broadwell, Aaron
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies are often prescribed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have inadequate responses to or are intolerant of methotrexate (MTX) and patients with poor prognostic indicators. This post hoc analysis evaluated effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab + MTX vs golimumab without MTX in RA patients. METHODS: AWARE, a real-world, prospective and pragmatic, Phase 4 study, compared effectiveness and safety of golimumab and infliximab in biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients. All treatment decisions were at the discretion of the treating rheumatologist. Effectiveness was evaluated by mean change in CDAI scores at Months 6 and 12. Safety was monitored through approximately 1 year. RESULTS: Among 685 golimumab-treated patients, 420 (61%) received concomitant MTX during the study and 265 (39%) did not receive MTX after enrollment; 63% and 72%, respectively, discontinued the study. Relative to golimumab without MTX, golimumab + MTX patients had shorter mean disease duration (8.7 vs 10.0 years) and a lower proportion received prior biologics (60% vs 72%); mean ± standard deviation (SD) baseline CDAI scores were similar (30.8 ± 15.1 and 32.6 ± 15.4). Mean ± SD changes from baseline in CDAI scores at Months 6 and 12, respectively, were similar with golimumab + MTX (− 10.2 ± 14.2 and − 10.8 ± 13.8) and golimumab without MTX (− 9.6 ± 12.9 and − 9.9 ± 13.1). The incidence of adverse events/100 patient-years (PY) (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 155.6 (145.6, 166.1) for golimumab + MTX and 191.2 (176.2, 207.1) for golimumab without MTX; infections were the most common type. The incidence of infusion reactions/100PY (95% CI) was 2.1 (1.1, 3.6) for golimumab + MTX versus 5.1 (2.9, 8.3) for golimumab without MTX; none were considered serious. For golimumab + MTX versus golimumab without MTX, rates/100PY (95% CI) of serious infections, opportunistic infections, and malignancies were 2.6 (1.5, 4.3) versus 7.0 (4.4, 10.6), 0.9 (0.3, 2.0) versus 2.6 (1.1, 5.0), and 3.0 (1.7, 4.7) versus 1.0 (0.2, 2.8), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mean change in CDAI score in the  golimumab without MTX group was generally similar to that of the golimumab + MTX group through 1 year, regardless of prior biologic therapy. Adverse events were consistent with the known IV golimumab safety profile. These results provide real world evidential data that may assist healthcare providers and patients with RA in making informed treatment decisions. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02728934 05/04/2016. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-023-00329-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10045110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100451102023-03-29 Effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab with and without concomitant methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the prospective, noninterventional AWARE study Broadwell, Aaron Schechtman, Joy Conaway, Douglas Kivitz, Alan Shiff, Natalie J. Black, Shawn Xu, Stephen Langholff, Wayne Schwartzman, Sergio Curtis, Jeffrey R. BMC Rheumatol Research BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies are often prescribed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have inadequate responses to or are intolerant of methotrexate (MTX) and patients with poor prognostic indicators. This post hoc analysis evaluated effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab + MTX vs golimumab without MTX in RA patients. METHODS: AWARE, a real-world, prospective and pragmatic, Phase 4 study, compared effectiveness and safety of golimumab and infliximab in biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients. All treatment decisions were at the discretion of the treating rheumatologist. Effectiveness was evaluated by mean change in CDAI scores at Months 6 and 12. Safety was monitored through approximately 1 year. RESULTS: Among 685 golimumab-treated patients, 420 (61%) received concomitant MTX during the study and 265 (39%) did not receive MTX after enrollment; 63% and 72%, respectively, discontinued the study. Relative to golimumab without MTX, golimumab + MTX patients had shorter mean disease duration (8.7 vs 10.0 years) and a lower proportion received prior biologics (60% vs 72%); mean ± standard deviation (SD) baseline CDAI scores were similar (30.8 ± 15.1 and 32.6 ± 15.4). Mean ± SD changes from baseline in CDAI scores at Months 6 and 12, respectively, were similar with golimumab + MTX (− 10.2 ± 14.2 and − 10.8 ± 13.8) and golimumab without MTX (− 9.6 ± 12.9 and − 9.9 ± 13.1). The incidence of adverse events/100 patient-years (PY) (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 155.6 (145.6, 166.1) for golimumab + MTX and 191.2 (176.2, 207.1) for golimumab without MTX; infections were the most common type. The incidence of infusion reactions/100PY (95% CI) was 2.1 (1.1, 3.6) for golimumab + MTX versus 5.1 (2.9, 8.3) for golimumab without MTX; none were considered serious. For golimumab + MTX versus golimumab without MTX, rates/100PY (95% CI) of serious infections, opportunistic infections, and malignancies were 2.6 (1.5, 4.3) versus 7.0 (4.4, 10.6), 0.9 (0.3, 2.0) versus 2.6 (1.1, 5.0), and 3.0 (1.7, 4.7) versus 1.0 (0.2, 2.8), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mean change in CDAI score in the  golimumab without MTX group was generally similar to that of the golimumab + MTX group through 1 year, regardless of prior biologic therapy. Adverse events were consistent with the known IV golimumab safety profile. These results provide real world evidential data that may assist healthcare providers and patients with RA in making informed treatment decisions. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02728934 05/04/2016. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-023-00329-8. BioMed Central 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10045110/ /pubmed/36973741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-023-00329-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Broadwell, Aaron
Schechtman, Joy
Conaway, Douglas
Kivitz, Alan
Shiff, Natalie J.
Black, Shawn
Xu, Stephen
Langholff, Wayne
Schwartzman, Sergio
Curtis, Jeffrey R.
Effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab with and without concomitant methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the prospective, noninterventional AWARE study
title Effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab with and without concomitant methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the prospective, noninterventional AWARE study
title_full Effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab with and without concomitant methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the prospective, noninterventional AWARE study
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab with and without concomitant methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the prospective, noninterventional AWARE study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab with and without concomitant methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the prospective, noninterventional AWARE study
title_short Effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab with and without concomitant methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the prospective, noninterventional AWARE study
title_sort effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab with and without concomitant methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the prospective, noninterventional aware study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10045110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36973741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-023-00329-8
work_keys_str_mv AT broadwellaaron effectivenessandsafetyofintravenousgolimumabwithandwithoutconcomitantmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisintheprospectivenoninterventionalawarestudy
AT schechtmanjoy effectivenessandsafetyofintravenousgolimumabwithandwithoutconcomitantmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisintheprospectivenoninterventionalawarestudy
AT conawaydouglas effectivenessandsafetyofintravenousgolimumabwithandwithoutconcomitantmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisintheprospectivenoninterventionalawarestudy
AT kivitzalan effectivenessandsafetyofintravenousgolimumabwithandwithoutconcomitantmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisintheprospectivenoninterventionalawarestudy
AT shiffnataliej effectivenessandsafetyofintravenousgolimumabwithandwithoutconcomitantmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisintheprospectivenoninterventionalawarestudy
AT blackshawn effectivenessandsafetyofintravenousgolimumabwithandwithoutconcomitantmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisintheprospectivenoninterventionalawarestudy
AT xustephen effectivenessandsafetyofintravenousgolimumabwithandwithoutconcomitantmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisintheprospectivenoninterventionalawarestudy
AT langholffwayne effectivenessandsafetyofintravenousgolimumabwithandwithoutconcomitantmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisintheprospectivenoninterventionalawarestudy
AT schwartzmansergio effectivenessandsafetyofintravenousgolimumabwithandwithoutconcomitantmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisintheprospectivenoninterventionalawarestudy
AT curtisjeffreyr effectivenessandsafetyofintravenousgolimumabwithandwithoutconcomitantmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisintheprospectivenoninterventionalawarestudy