Cargando…

The impact of preloaded intraocular lens implantation system (TECNIS iTec®) in routine cataract surgery in China: a time-motion analysis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on surgical efficiency and labor time cost of preloaded intraocular lens (IOL) implantation system compared with manual IOL implantation system in age-related cataract surgery in China. METHODS: This study was an observational, multicenter, prospective time-motion a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Xudong, Zhou, Jian, Zhang, Guangbin, Jia, Songbai, Yuan, Jun, Hu, Ke, Liu, Xinhua, Zeng, Mingbing, Wang, Zhenyu, Tan, Baoying, Lu, Xingwei, Lin, Ailing, Hu, Xiaohan, Xuan, Jianwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10045151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36978039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02858-9
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on surgical efficiency and labor time cost of preloaded intraocular lens (IOL) implantation system compared with manual IOL implantation system in age-related cataract surgery in China. METHODS: This study was an observational, multicenter, prospective time-motion analysis. IOL preparation time, operation time, cleaning time, number and cost of cataract surgeries in eight participating hospitals were collected. The linear mixed model was used to explore factors associated with the difference in operation time between the preloaded IOL implantation system and the manual IOL implantation system. A time-motion model was constructed to convert the operation time cost saved by using preloaded IOL into economic benefits from hospital and social perspective, respectively. RESULTS: There were 2,591 cases included in the study (preloaded IOL: 1,591 cases; manual IOL: 1,000 cases). The preloaded IOL implantation system was significant time-saving in both preparation time and operation time compared to the manual IOL implantation system (25.48s vs. 47.04s, P < 0.001 and 353.84s vs. 367.46s, P = 0.004, respectively). An average total of 35.18s can be saved by using preloaded IOL per procedure. The results of linear mixed model showed that the type of IOL was the main factor leading to the difference in preparation time between preloaded IOL and manual IOL implantation system. By switching from manual IOL to preloaded IOL, the model projected additional 392 surgeries can be performed each year and an increase in revenue of $565,282 per hospital, a 9% increase from hospital perspective. And the annual productivity loss saved by using preloaded IOL was $3,006 in eight hospitals from perspective of society. CONCLUSION: Compared with manual IOL implantation system, the preloaded IOL implantation system reduces lens preparation time and operation time, which increases potential surgical volume and revenue, and reduces the loss of work productivity. This study provides real-world evidence to support the advantages of the preloaded IOL implantation system in improving efficiency of ophthalmic surgery in China.