Cargando…
The optimal pre-post allocation for randomized clinical trials
BACKGROUND: In pre-post designs, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is a standard technique to detect the treatment effect with a continuous variable measured at baseline and follow-up. For measurements subject to a high degree of variability, it may be advisable to repeat the pre-treatment and/or foll...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10045175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36978004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01893-w |
_version_ | 1784913536887029760 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Shiyang Wang, Tianying |
author_facet | Ma, Shiyang Wang, Tianying |
author_sort | Ma, Shiyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In pre-post designs, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is a standard technique to detect the treatment effect with a continuous variable measured at baseline and follow-up. For measurements subject to a high degree of variability, it may be advisable to repeat the pre-treatment and/or follow-up assessments. In general, repeating the follow-up measurements is more advantageous than repeating the pre-treatment measurements, while the latter can still be valuable and improve efficiency in clinical trials. METHODS: In this article, we report investigations of using multiple pre-treatment and post-treatment measurements in randomized clinical trials. We consider the sample size formula for ANCOVA under general correlation structures with the pre-treatment mean included as the covariate and the mean follow-up value included as the response. We propose an optimal experimental design of multiple pre-post allocations under a specified constraint, that is, given the total number of pre-post treatment visits. The optimal number of the pre-treatment measurements is derived. For non-linear models, closed-form formulas for sample size/power calculations are generally unavailable, but we conduct Monte Carlo simulation studies instead. RESULTS: Theoretical formulas and simulation studies show the benefits of repeating the pre-treatment measurements in pre-post randomized studies. The optimal pre-post allocation derived from the ANCOVA extends well to binary measurements in simulation studies, using logistic regression and generalized estimating equations (GEE). CONCLUSIONS: Repeating baselines and follow-up assessments is a valuable and efficient technique in pre-post design. The proposed optimal pre-post allocation designs can minimize the sample size, i.e., achieve maximum power. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-023-01893-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10045175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100451752023-03-29 The optimal pre-post allocation for randomized clinical trials Ma, Shiyang Wang, Tianying BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: In pre-post designs, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is a standard technique to detect the treatment effect with a continuous variable measured at baseline and follow-up. For measurements subject to a high degree of variability, it may be advisable to repeat the pre-treatment and/or follow-up assessments. In general, repeating the follow-up measurements is more advantageous than repeating the pre-treatment measurements, while the latter can still be valuable and improve efficiency in clinical trials. METHODS: In this article, we report investigations of using multiple pre-treatment and post-treatment measurements in randomized clinical trials. We consider the sample size formula for ANCOVA under general correlation structures with the pre-treatment mean included as the covariate and the mean follow-up value included as the response. We propose an optimal experimental design of multiple pre-post allocations under a specified constraint, that is, given the total number of pre-post treatment visits. The optimal number of the pre-treatment measurements is derived. For non-linear models, closed-form formulas for sample size/power calculations are generally unavailable, but we conduct Monte Carlo simulation studies instead. RESULTS: Theoretical formulas and simulation studies show the benefits of repeating the pre-treatment measurements in pre-post randomized studies. The optimal pre-post allocation derived from the ANCOVA extends well to binary measurements in simulation studies, using logistic regression and generalized estimating equations (GEE). CONCLUSIONS: Repeating baselines and follow-up assessments is a valuable and efficient technique in pre-post design. The proposed optimal pre-post allocation designs can minimize the sample size, i.e., achieve maximum power. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-023-01893-w. BioMed Central 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10045175/ /pubmed/36978004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01893-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ma, Shiyang Wang, Tianying The optimal pre-post allocation for randomized clinical trials |
title | The optimal pre-post allocation for randomized clinical trials |
title_full | The optimal pre-post allocation for randomized clinical trials |
title_fullStr | The optimal pre-post allocation for randomized clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The optimal pre-post allocation for randomized clinical trials |
title_short | The optimal pre-post allocation for randomized clinical trials |
title_sort | optimal pre-post allocation for randomized clinical trials |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10045175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36978004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01893-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mashiyang theoptimalprepostallocationforrandomizedclinicaltrials AT wangtianying theoptimalprepostallocationforrandomizedclinicaltrials AT mashiyang optimalprepostallocationforrandomizedclinicaltrials AT wangtianying optimalprepostallocationforrandomizedclinicaltrials |